Tahira Noor, Daniel C Schultz, Gustavo Seabra, Yuting Zhai, Kwangcheol Casey Jeong, Saleem Ahmed Bokhari, Fahim Ashraf Qureshi, Abdul Rauf Siddiqi, Chenglong Li
{"title":"磺胺类似物的合成、结构研究和抑制潜力:来自硅和体外分析的见解。","authors":"Tahira Noor, Daniel C Schultz, Gustavo Seabra, Yuting Zhai, Kwangcheol Casey Jeong, Saleem Ahmed Bokhari, Fahim Ashraf Qureshi, Abdul Rauf Siddiqi, Chenglong Li","doi":"10.17179/excli2024-8118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a growing public health threat worldwide, and the current drug development pipeline has thus far been inadequate in addressing this impending crisis. Further research into antibiotic agents, both existing and novel, is therefore paramount for identifying suitable candidates to combat antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Sulfonamides, the first class of synthetic antibiotics, target dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), a key bacterial enzyme. While this class of antibiotics has historically demonstrated great utility, their use has diminished due to resistance and undesired side effects. In the present study, we synthesized a selection of four sulfonamide analogues (<b>FQ5</b>, <b>FQ6</b>, <b>FQ7</b> and <b>FQ12</b>), validated their structures through NMR spectroscopy, and evaluated their inhibitory potential through computational docking and MIC assays against four bacterial strains: <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> ATCC 25923, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> ATCC 27853, <i>Escherichia coli</i> ATCC 35401 and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> ATCC 6633. Each compound exhibited antibacterial activity; <b>FQ5</b> demonstrated the most potent activity, with an MIC of 32, 16, 16, and 16 µg/mL against aforementioned strains, respectively. <b>FQ6</b>, <b>FQ7</b> and <b>FQ12</b>, on the other hand, exhibited moderate activity against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and <i>E. coli</i> (MIC = 128 µg/mL each) and low activity against <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i> (MIC = 256 µg/mL each). Molecular docking studies indicated that <b>FQ5</b> captures multiple hydrogen bonding, ionic, and π-π interactions with key binding pocket residues of DHPS, and <b>FQ5</b> also demonstrated superior predicted drug-likeness in <i>in silico</i> ADMET studies compared to other compounds. <b>FQ5</b> is therefore a favorable starting point for further optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12247,"journal":{"name":"EXCLI Journal","volume":"24 ","pages":"527-538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesis, structural studies, and inhibitory potential of selected sulfonamide analogues: insights from in silico and in vitro analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Tahira Noor, Daniel C Schultz, Gustavo Seabra, Yuting Zhai, Kwangcheol Casey Jeong, Saleem Ahmed Bokhari, Fahim Ashraf Qureshi, Abdul Rauf Siddiqi, Chenglong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.17179/excli2024-8118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a growing public health threat worldwide, and the current drug development pipeline has thus far been inadequate in addressing this impending crisis. Further research into antibiotic agents, both existing and novel, is therefore paramount for identifying suitable candidates to combat antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Sulfonamides, the first class of synthetic antibiotics, target dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), a key bacterial enzyme. While this class of antibiotics has historically demonstrated great utility, their use has diminished due to resistance and undesired side effects. In the present study, we synthesized a selection of four sulfonamide analogues (<b>FQ5</b>, <b>FQ6</b>, <b>FQ7</b> and <b>FQ12</b>), validated their structures through NMR spectroscopy, and evaluated their inhibitory potential through computational docking and MIC assays against four bacterial strains: <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> ATCC 25923, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> ATCC 27853, <i>Escherichia coli</i> ATCC 35401 and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> ATCC 6633. Each compound exhibited antibacterial activity; <b>FQ5</b> demonstrated the most potent activity, with an MIC of 32, 16, 16, and 16 µg/mL against aforementioned strains, respectively. <b>FQ6</b>, <b>FQ7</b> and <b>FQ12</b>, on the other hand, exhibited moderate activity against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and <i>E. coli</i> (MIC = 128 µg/mL each) and low activity against <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i> (MIC = 256 µg/mL each). Molecular docking studies indicated that <b>FQ5</b> captures multiple hydrogen bonding, ionic, and π-π interactions with key binding pocket residues of DHPS, and <b>FQ5</b> also demonstrated superior predicted drug-likeness in <i>in silico</i> ADMET studies compared to other compounds. <b>FQ5</b> is therefore a favorable starting point for further optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXCLI Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"527-538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXCLI Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2024-8118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXCLI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2024-8118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synthesis, structural studies, and inhibitory potential of selected sulfonamide analogues: insights from in silico and in vitro analyses.
Antimicrobial resistance is a growing public health threat worldwide, and the current drug development pipeline has thus far been inadequate in addressing this impending crisis. Further research into antibiotic agents, both existing and novel, is therefore paramount for identifying suitable candidates to combat antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Sulfonamides, the first class of synthetic antibiotics, target dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), a key bacterial enzyme. While this class of antibiotics has historically demonstrated great utility, their use has diminished due to resistance and undesired side effects. In the present study, we synthesized a selection of four sulfonamide analogues (FQ5, FQ6, FQ7 and FQ12), validated their structures through NMR spectroscopy, and evaluated their inhibitory potential through computational docking and MIC assays against four bacterial strains: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Escherichia coli ATCC 35401 and Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. Each compound exhibited antibacterial activity; FQ5 demonstrated the most potent activity, with an MIC of 32, 16, 16, and 16 µg/mL against aforementioned strains, respectively. FQ6, FQ7 and FQ12, on the other hand, exhibited moderate activity against P. aeruginosa and E. coli (MIC = 128 µg/mL each) and low activity against S. aureus and B. subtilis (MIC = 256 µg/mL each). Molecular docking studies indicated that FQ5 captures multiple hydrogen bonding, ionic, and π-π interactions with key binding pocket residues of DHPS, and FQ5 also demonstrated superior predicted drug-likeness in in silico ADMET studies compared to other compounds. FQ5 is therefore a favorable starting point for further optimization.
期刊介绍:
EXCLI Journal publishes original research reports, authoritative reviews and case reports of experimental and clinical sciences.
The journal is particularly keen to keep a broad view of science and technology, and therefore welcomes papers which bridge disciplines and may not suit the narrow specialism of other journals. Although the general emphasis is on biological sciences, studies from the following fields are explicitly encouraged (alphabetical order):
aging research, behavioral sciences, biochemistry, cell biology, chemistry including analytical chemistry, clinical and preclinical studies, drug development, environmental health, ergonomics, forensic medicine, genetics, hepatology and gastroenterology, immunology, neurosciences, occupational medicine, oncology and cancer research, pharmacology, proteomics, psychiatric research, psychology, systems biology, toxicology