不同模式体外增强反搏对急性血流动力学影响的评价。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1555358
Yujia Zhong, Liling Hao, Xue Jia, Songrim Paek, Shuai Tian, Guifu Wu
{"title":"不同模式体外增强反搏对急性血流动力学影响的评价。","authors":"Yujia Zhong, Liling Hao, Xue Jia, Songrim Paek, Shuai Tian, Guifu Wu","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1555358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive device for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. However, there are minimal data regarding the effects of different EECP modes on acute hemodynamic changes, particularly blood flow redistribution. This study aimed to investigate the systemic hemodynamic effects during different EECP modes based on clinical trials and numerical analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients with cardiovascular disease and 15 healthy subjects completed four and six EECP modes, respectively. These EECP modes changed the parameters, including counterpulsation pressure, start time, and counterpulsation frequency. Hemodynamic parameters in the aorta (AO), right femoral artery (RF), and right brachial artery (RB), including mean flow rate (FR), mean blood velocity (MV), peak systolic velocity (PSV), minimum diastolic velocity (MDV), and diastolic/systolic blood pressure ratio (D/S), were measured during EECP treatments. Meanwhile, the simulation of hemodynamic responses to different EECP modes based on a 0D-1D cardiovascular system model were conducted and compared with the clinical results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As counterpulsation pressure increased, the FR and PSV of AO, the FR, MV, PSV, and MDV of RF, the FR, MV, and MDV of RB, and D/S increased in patients (<i>all P < 0.05</i>). The MV of RF, the FR, MV, PSV, and MDV of RB, and D/S of patients decreased significantly with increasing start time (<i>all P < 0.05</i>). For the increase of counterpulsation frequency, the FR, MV, and PSV of AO, the MV, PSV, and MDV of RF, and the FR and MV of RB significantly decreased in patients (<i>all P < 0.05</i>). For the health group, most patients' results were similar. Multiple groups of pressure experiments indicated that 25-30 kPa significantly improved blood flow. The numerical results under different EECP modes were generally closely aligned with clinical measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different EECP modes induced different hemodynamic responses. Higher counterpulsation pressure, T wave start time, and 1:1 counterpulsation frequency are recommended to improve blood flow. Hemodynamic simulations prepare the way for the creation of virtual databases to obtain population-based strategies and then allow for precision-based strategies through individual modeling. The different hemodynamic responses to EECP modes provide theoretical guidance for the development of a patient-specific treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1555358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of enhanced external counterpulsation with different modes on acute hemodynamic effects.\",\"authors\":\"Yujia Zhong, Liling Hao, Xue Jia, Songrim Paek, Shuai Tian, Guifu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2025.1555358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive device for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. However, there are minimal data regarding the effects of different EECP modes on acute hemodynamic changes, particularly blood flow redistribution. This study aimed to investigate the systemic hemodynamic effects during different EECP modes based on clinical trials and numerical analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients with cardiovascular disease and 15 healthy subjects completed four and six EECP modes, respectively. These EECP modes changed the parameters, including counterpulsation pressure, start time, and counterpulsation frequency. Hemodynamic parameters in the aorta (AO), right femoral artery (RF), and right brachial artery (RB), including mean flow rate (FR), mean blood velocity (MV), peak systolic velocity (PSV), minimum diastolic velocity (MDV), and diastolic/systolic blood pressure ratio (D/S), were measured during EECP treatments. Meanwhile, the simulation of hemodynamic responses to different EECP modes based on a 0D-1D cardiovascular system model were conducted and compared with the clinical results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As counterpulsation pressure increased, the FR and PSV of AO, the FR, MV, PSV, and MDV of RF, the FR, MV, and MDV of RB, and D/S increased in patients (<i>all P < 0.05</i>). The MV of RF, the FR, MV, PSV, and MDV of RB, and D/S of patients decreased significantly with increasing start time (<i>all P < 0.05</i>). For the increase of counterpulsation frequency, the FR, MV, and PSV of AO, the MV, PSV, and MDV of RF, and the FR and MV of RB significantly decreased in patients (<i>all P < 0.05</i>). For the health group, most patients' results were similar. Multiple groups of pressure experiments indicated that 25-30 kPa significantly improved blood flow. The numerical results under different EECP modes were generally closely aligned with clinical measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different EECP modes induced different hemodynamic responses. Higher counterpulsation pressure, T wave start time, and 1:1 counterpulsation frequency are recommended to improve blood flow. Hemodynamic simulations prepare the way for the creation of virtual databases to obtain population-based strategies and then allow for precision-based strategies through individual modeling. The different hemodynamic responses to EECP modes provide theoretical guidance for the development of a patient-specific treatment strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1555358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1555358\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1555358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:体外增强反搏(EECP)是一种治疗心血管疾病的无创设备。然而,关于不同EECP模式对急性血流动力学变化,特别是血流再分布的影响的数据很少。本研究旨在通过临床试验和数值分析,探讨不同EECP模式对全身血流动力学的影响。方法:15例心血管疾病患者和15例健康者分别完成4种和6种EECP模式。这些EECP模式改变了参数,包括反脉动压力、启动时间和反脉动频率。测量EECP治疗期间主动脉(AO)、右股动脉(RF)、右肱动脉(RB)的血流动力学参数,包括平均血流速率(FR)、平均血流速度(MV)、峰值收缩速度(PSV)、最小舒张速度(MDV)、舒张/收缩压比(D/S)。同时,基于0D-1D心血管系统模型,模拟不同EECP模式下的血流动力学反应,并与临床结果进行对比。结果:随着患者反搏压升高,AO的FR、PSV升高,RF的FR、MV、PSV、MDV升高,RB的FR、MV、MDV升高,D/S升高(均P < 0.05)。患者RF的MV、RB的FR、MV、PSV、MDV及D/S均随起始时间的延长而显著降低(均P < 0.05)。随着反搏频率的增加,患者AO的FR、MV、PSV, RF的MV、PSV、MDV, RB的FR、MV均显著降低(均P < 0.05)。对于健康组,大多数患者的结果是相似的。多组压力实验表明,25-30 kPa可显著改善血流量。不同EECP模式下的数值结果与临床测量结果基本一致。结论:不同的脑电图模式可诱导不同的血流动力学反应。建议提高反搏压力、T波启动时间和1:1的反搏频率以改善血流。血流动力学模拟为创建虚拟数据库准备了道路,以获得基于种群的策略,然后通过个体建模允许基于精度的策略。不同的血流动力学反应对EECP模式提供了理论指导的发展,病人的具体治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of enhanced external counterpulsation with different modes on acute hemodynamic effects.

Objective: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive device for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. However, there are minimal data regarding the effects of different EECP modes on acute hemodynamic changes, particularly blood flow redistribution. This study aimed to investigate the systemic hemodynamic effects during different EECP modes based on clinical trials and numerical analysis.

Methods: Fifteen patients with cardiovascular disease and 15 healthy subjects completed four and six EECP modes, respectively. These EECP modes changed the parameters, including counterpulsation pressure, start time, and counterpulsation frequency. Hemodynamic parameters in the aorta (AO), right femoral artery (RF), and right brachial artery (RB), including mean flow rate (FR), mean blood velocity (MV), peak systolic velocity (PSV), minimum diastolic velocity (MDV), and diastolic/systolic blood pressure ratio (D/S), were measured during EECP treatments. Meanwhile, the simulation of hemodynamic responses to different EECP modes based on a 0D-1D cardiovascular system model were conducted and compared with the clinical results.

Results: As counterpulsation pressure increased, the FR and PSV of AO, the FR, MV, PSV, and MDV of RF, the FR, MV, and MDV of RB, and D/S increased in patients (all P < 0.05). The MV of RF, the FR, MV, PSV, and MDV of RB, and D/S of patients decreased significantly with increasing start time (all P < 0.05). For the increase of counterpulsation frequency, the FR, MV, and PSV of AO, the MV, PSV, and MDV of RF, and the FR and MV of RB significantly decreased in patients (all P < 0.05). For the health group, most patients' results were similar. Multiple groups of pressure experiments indicated that 25-30 kPa significantly improved blood flow. The numerical results under different EECP modes were generally closely aligned with clinical measurements.

Conclusion: Different EECP modes induced different hemodynamic responses. Higher counterpulsation pressure, T wave start time, and 1:1 counterpulsation frequency are recommended to improve blood flow. Hemodynamic simulations prepare the way for the creation of virtual databases to obtain population-based strategies and then allow for precision-based strategies through individual modeling. The different hemodynamic responses to EECP modes provide theoretical guidance for the development of a patient-specific treatment strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信