利用人工智能在没有参考对象的情况下测量结肠直肠息肉的大小。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2556-1836
Chin-Yuan Yii, Ding-Ek Toh, Tzu-An Chen, Wei-Lun Hsu, Huang-Jen Lai, Yin-Chen Wang, Chang-Ru Liu, Yow-Chii Kuo, Shih-Hao Young, Fu-Ming Chang, Chen Lin
{"title":"利用人工智能在没有参考对象的情况下测量结肠直肠息肉的大小。","authors":"Chin-Yuan Yii, Ding-Ek Toh, Tzu-An Chen, Wei-Lun Hsu, Huang-Jen Lai, Yin-Chen Wang, Chang-Ru Liu, Yow-Chii Kuo, Shih-Hao Young, Fu-Ming Chang, Chen Lin","doi":"10.1055/a-2556-1836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Polyp size is crucial for determining colonoscopy surveillance intervals. We present an artificial intelligence (AI) model for colorectal polyp size measurement without a reference object.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The regression model for polyp size estimation was developed using outputs from two SegFormer models, segmentation and depth estimation. Initially built on colonoscopic images of polyp phantoms, the model underwent transfer learning with 1,304 real-world images. Testing was conducted on 178 images from 52 polyps, independent of the training set, using a snare as the ground truth for size comparison with the AI-based model. Polyps were classified into three size groups: ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm. Error rates were calculated to evaluate discrepancies in actual size values between the AI model and the snare method. Precision indicated the positive predictive value per size group and recall and Bland-Altman were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.03 mm between methods, with limits of agreement from -1.654 mm to 1.596 mm. AI model error rates for actual size discrepancies were 10.74%, 12.36%, and 9.89% for the ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm groups, respectively, averaging 11.47%. Precision values were 0.870, 0.911, and 0.857, with overall recall of 0.846.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that colorectal polyp size measurement by AI model is practical and clinically useful, exhibiting low error rates and high precision. AI shows promise as an accurate tool for measurement without the need for a reference object during screening colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25561836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of artificial intelligence to measure colorectal polyp size without a reference object.\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Yuan Yii, Ding-Ek Toh, Tzu-An Chen, Wei-Lun Hsu, Huang-Jen Lai, Yin-Chen Wang, Chang-Ru Liu, Yow-Chii Kuo, Shih-Hao Young, Fu-Ming Chang, Chen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2556-1836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Polyp size is crucial for determining colonoscopy surveillance intervals. We present an artificial intelligence (AI) model for colorectal polyp size measurement without a reference object.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The regression model for polyp size estimation was developed using outputs from two SegFormer models, segmentation and depth estimation. Initially built on colonoscopic images of polyp phantoms, the model underwent transfer learning with 1,304 real-world images. Testing was conducted on 178 images from 52 polyps, independent of the training set, using a snare as the ground truth for size comparison with the AI-based model. Polyps were classified into three size groups: ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm. Error rates were calculated to evaluate discrepancies in actual size values between the AI model and the snare method. Precision indicated the positive predictive value per size group and recall and Bland-Altman were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.03 mm between methods, with limits of agreement from -1.654 mm to 1.596 mm. AI model error rates for actual size discrepancies were 10.74%, 12.36%, and 9.89% for the ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm groups, respectively, averaging 11.47%. Precision values were 0.870, 0.911, and 0.857, with overall recall of 0.846.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that colorectal polyp size measurement by AI model is practical and clinically useful, exhibiting low error rates and high precision. AI shows promise as an accurate tool for measurement without the need for a reference object during screening colonoscopy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a25561836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2556-1836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2556-1836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:息肉大小是确定结肠镜监测间隔的关键因素。我们提出了一种人工智能(AI)模型,用于无参考对象的结肠直肠息肉大小测量。方法:利用分割和深度估计两个SegFormer模型的输出,建立息肉大小估计的回归模型。该模型最初建立在息肉幻象的结肠镜图像上,并对1,304张真实世界的图像进行了迁移学习。对来自52个息肉的178张图像进行了测试,独立于训练集,使用陷阱作为与基于人工智能的模型进行尺寸比较的基础真理。息肉大小分为≤5mm、5-10 mm和≥10 mm 3组。计算错误率以评估AI模型与snare方法之间实际尺寸值的差异。精密度表示每个尺寸组的阳性预测值,召回率和Bland-Altman也进行了。结果:Bland-Altman分析显示两种方法的平均偏差为-0.03 mm,一致性限为-1.654 mm至1.596 mm。对于≤5 mm、5-10 mm和≥10 mm组,AI模型对实际尺寸差异的误差率分别为10.74%、12.36%和9.89%,平均为11.47%。精密度值分别为0.870、0.911和0.857,总召回率为0.846。结论:人工智能模型测量结直肠息肉大小具有较低的错误率和较高的精度,具有实用性和临床应用价值。人工智能有望成为一种精确的测量工具,在筛查结肠镜检查过程中不需要参考对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of artificial intelligence to measure colorectal polyp size without a reference object.

Background and study aims: Polyp size is crucial for determining colonoscopy surveillance intervals. We present an artificial intelligence (AI) model for colorectal polyp size measurement without a reference object.

Methods: The regression model for polyp size estimation was developed using outputs from two SegFormer models, segmentation and depth estimation. Initially built on colonoscopic images of polyp phantoms, the model underwent transfer learning with 1,304 real-world images. Testing was conducted on 178 images from 52 polyps, independent of the training set, using a snare as the ground truth for size comparison with the AI-based model. Polyps were classified into three size groups: ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm. Error rates were calculated to evaluate discrepancies in actual size values between the AI model and the snare method. Precision indicated the positive predictive value per size group and recall and Bland-Altman were also conducted.

Results: The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.03 mm between methods, with limits of agreement from -1.654 mm to 1.596 mm. AI model error rates for actual size discrepancies were 10.74%, 12.36%, and 9.89% for the ≤ 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and ≥ 10 mm groups, respectively, averaging 11.47%. Precision values were 0.870, 0.911, and 0.857, with overall recall of 0.846.

Conclusions: Our study shows that colorectal polyp size measurement by AI model is practical and clinically useful, exhibiting low error rates and high precision. AI shows promise as an accurate tool for measurement without the need for a reference object during screening colonoscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信