Majedh Abdo Ali Al-Somairi, Yuwen Yan, Maged S Alhammadi, Naseem Ali Al-Worafi, Enas Senan Alyafrusee, Bushra Sufyan Almaqrami, Hasan M Sharhan, Barakat Al-Tayar, Bowen Zheng, Yi Liu
{"title":"拔牙和非拔牙治疗I类骨错的三维咽气道和舌骨改变:固定正畸矫治器和透明矫正器的比较研究","authors":"Majedh Abdo Ali Al-Somairi, Yuwen Yan, Maged S Alhammadi, Naseem Ali Al-Worafi, Enas Senan Alyafrusee, Bushra Sufyan Almaqrami, Hasan M Sharhan, Barakat Al-Tayar, Bowen Zheng, Yi Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06367-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to provide a comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of fixed appliances (FAs) and clear aligners (CAs) on pharyngeal airway (PA) dimensions and hyoid bone (HB) positioning in skeletal Class I malocclusion patients treated with extraction and non-extraction protocols, comparing the effects within each protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 120 adult patients divided into extraction and non-extraction groups, each further subdivided equally into those treated with FAs and CAs. PA segmentation and measurements were conducted with Dolphin 11.8 (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA). The PA was analyzed in the nasopharyngeal (NP), oropharyngeal (OP), and hypopharyngeal (HP), total pharyngeal (TP) airway, while HB parameters were measured using InVivo 6.0.3 (Anatomage, San Jose, CA). Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the evaluated parameters showed a significant difference in the baseline, indicating almost comparable groups. Inter-group comparisons showed that within the non-extraction group, FAs caused greater decreases in OP sagittal width and HP lateral width and more significant increases in vertical hyoid position (H-FH) compared to CAs (P < 0.05). In the extraction group, FAs resulted in greater decreases in OP lateral width and volume, HP volume, and more significant H-FH increases than CAs (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fixed appliances caused greater reductions in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal dimensions and more significant changes in hyoid bone position compared to clear aligners, particularly in extraction cases. Clinicians should consider these effects when selecting treatment modalities, especially for patients with airway concerns.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Fixed appliances significantly impact pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone positioning, while clear aligners have milder effects, emphasizing the need for careful treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 6","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional pharyngeal airway and hyoid bone changes in skeletal class I malocclusion treated with extraction and non-extraction protocols: a comparative study of fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners.\",\"authors\":\"Majedh Abdo Ali Al-Somairi, Yuwen Yan, Maged S Alhammadi, Naseem Ali Al-Worafi, Enas Senan Alyafrusee, Bushra Sufyan Almaqrami, Hasan M Sharhan, Barakat Al-Tayar, Bowen Zheng, Yi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06367-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to provide a comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of fixed appliances (FAs) and clear aligners (CAs) on pharyngeal airway (PA) dimensions and hyoid bone (HB) positioning in skeletal Class I malocclusion patients treated with extraction and non-extraction protocols, comparing the effects within each protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 120 adult patients divided into extraction and non-extraction groups, each further subdivided equally into those treated with FAs and CAs. PA segmentation and measurements were conducted with Dolphin 11.8 (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA). The PA was analyzed in the nasopharyngeal (NP), oropharyngeal (OP), and hypopharyngeal (HP), total pharyngeal (TP) airway, while HB parameters were measured using InVivo 6.0.3 (Anatomage, San Jose, CA). Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the evaluated parameters showed a significant difference in the baseline, indicating almost comparable groups. Inter-group comparisons showed that within the non-extraction group, FAs caused greater decreases in OP sagittal width and HP lateral width and more significant increases in vertical hyoid position (H-FH) compared to CAs (P < 0.05). In the extraction group, FAs resulted in greater decreases in OP lateral width and volume, HP volume, and more significant H-FH increases than CAs (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fixed appliances caused greater reductions in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal dimensions and more significant changes in hyoid bone position compared to clear aligners, particularly in extraction cases. Clinicians should consider these effects when selecting treatment modalities, especially for patients with airway concerns.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Fixed appliances significantly impact pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone positioning, while clear aligners have milder effects, emphasizing the need for careful treatment planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06367-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06367-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在提供一个全面的三维(3D)评估固定矫治器(FAs)和清除矫治器(CAs)对骨骼I类错颌患者的咽气道(PA)尺寸和舌骨(HB)定位的影响,并比较每种方案的效果。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入120例成年患者,分为拔牙组和非拔牙组,每组再平均分为FAs组和CAs组。使用Dolphin 11.8 (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA)进行PA分割和测量。分析鼻咽(NP)、口咽(OP)、下咽(HP)、总咽(TP)气道的PA,使用InVivo 6.0.3 (Anatomage, San Jose, CA)测量HB参数。进行描述性和分析性统计,显著性水平设置为P。结果:所有评估参数均未显示基线有显著差异,表明几乎可比较组。组间比较显示,在非拔牙组中,与CAs相比,FAs引起的上颌矢状面宽度和下颌侧宽度的减小更大,舌骨垂直位置(H-FH)的增加更显著(P结论:固定矫治器引起的口咽和下咽尺寸的减小更大,舌骨位置的变化更显著,特别是在拔牙病例中。临床医生在选择治疗方式时应考虑这些影响,特别是对有气道问题的患者。临床相关性:固定矫治器显著影响咽气道尺寸和舌骨定位,而透明矫治器影响较轻,强调需要仔细的治疗计划。
Three-dimensional pharyngeal airway and hyoid bone changes in skeletal class I malocclusion treated with extraction and non-extraction protocols: a comparative study of fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners.
Objectives: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of fixed appliances (FAs) and clear aligners (CAs) on pharyngeal airway (PA) dimensions and hyoid bone (HB) positioning in skeletal Class I malocclusion patients treated with extraction and non-extraction protocols, comparing the effects within each protocol.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study involved 120 adult patients divided into extraction and non-extraction groups, each further subdivided equally into those treated with FAs and CAs. PA segmentation and measurements were conducted with Dolphin 11.8 (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA). The PA was analyzed in the nasopharyngeal (NP), oropharyngeal (OP), and hypopharyngeal (HP), total pharyngeal (TP) airway, while HB parameters were measured using InVivo 6.0.3 (Anatomage, San Jose, CA). Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.
Results: None of the evaluated parameters showed a significant difference in the baseline, indicating almost comparable groups. Inter-group comparisons showed that within the non-extraction group, FAs caused greater decreases in OP sagittal width and HP lateral width and more significant increases in vertical hyoid position (H-FH) compared to CAs (P < 0.05). In the extraction group, FAs resulted in greater decreases in OP lateral width and volume, HP volume, and more significant H-FH increases than CAs (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Fixed appliances caused greater reductions in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal dimensions and more significant changes in hyoid bone position compared to clear aligners, particularly in extraction cases. Clinicians should consider these effects when selecting treatment modalities, especially for patients with airway concerns.
Clinical relevance: Fixed appliances significantly impact pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone positioning, while clear aligners have milder effects, emphasizing the need for careful treatment planning.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.