使用临床状态时间对心力衰竭临床试验中复合时间到事件终点的层次分析。

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation: Heart Failure Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011783
Eric S Leifer, James F Troendle, Mitchell A Psotka, Vandana Sachdev
{"title":"使用临床状态时间对心力衰竭临床试验中复合时间到事件终点的层次分析。","authors":"Eric S Leifer, James F Troendle, Mitchell A Psotka, Vandana Sachdev","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much work has been done on developing hierarchical composite end point analysis methods, which meaningfully measure the effect of a treatment for patients with heart failure. Two motivations for this work have been as follows: (1) trying to ensure that more severe outcomes are weighted more heavily in the analysis; (2) combining different types of end points such as death, number of recurrent hospitalizations, and continuous functional or biologic end points. Such methods include the win ratio, the win odds, and the proportion in favor of treatment. In this article, our focus is when all components are clinical end points such as death or hospitalizations and do not include continuous end points. We review these methods using HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training). We also describe recent methods for combining different clinical end points, which take into account the time a subject is in a particular clinical state. These include the pairwise win time, the restricted mean time in favor of treatment, the expected win time, and the expected win time against reference. We discuss the US Food and Drug Administration guidances and make general recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e011783"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hierarchical Analysis of Composite Time-to-Event End Points in Heart Failure Clinical Trials Using Time in Clinical State.\",\"authors\":\"Eric S Leifer, James F Troendle, Mitchell A Psotka, Vandana Sachdev\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Much work has been done on developing hierarchical composite end point analysis methods, which meaningfully measure the effect of a treatment for patients with heart failure. Two motivations for this work have been as follows: (1) trying to ensure that more severe outcomes are weighted more heavily in the analysis; (2) combining different types of end points such as death, number of recurrent hospitalizations, and continuous functional or biologic end points. Such methods include the win ratio, the win odds, and the proportion in favor of treatment. In this article, our focus is when all components are clinical end points such as death or hospitalizations and do not include continuous end points. We review these methods using HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training). We also describe recent methods for combining different clinical end points, which take into account the time a subject is in a particular clinical state. These include the pairwise win time, the restricted mean time in favor of treatment, the expected win time, and the expected win time against reference. We discuss the US Food and Drug Administration guidances and make general recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e011783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011783\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在开发分层复合终点分析方法方面已经做了很多工作,这些方法有意义地测量心力衰竭患者的治疗效果。这项工作的两个动机如下:(1)试图确保更严重的结果在分析中权重更大;(2)结合不同类型的终点,如死亡、复发住院次数和连续的功能或生物终点。这些方法包括胜率、获胜几率和赞成治疗的比例。在本文中,我们的重点是当所有组成部分都是临床终点时,如死亡或住院,而不包括连续终点。我们使用HF-ACTION(心力衰竭:一项调查运动训练结果的对照试验)来回顾这些方法。我们还描述了结合不同临床终点的最新方法,这些方法考虑到受试者处于特定临床状态的时间。这些包括两两获胜时间、有利于治疗的有限平均时间、预期获胜时间和反对参考的预期获胜时间。我们讨论美国食品和药物管理局的指导方针,并提出一般性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hierarchical Analysis of Composite Time-to-Event End Points in Heart Failure Clinical Trials Using Time in Clinical State.

Much work has been done on developing hierarchical composite end point analysis methods, which meaningfully measure the effect of a treatment for patients with heart failure. Two motivations for this work have been as follows: (1) trying to ensure that more severe outcomes are weighted more heavily in the analysis; (2) combining different types of end points such as death, number of recurrent hospitalizations, and continuous functional or biologic end points. Such methods include the win ratio, the win odds, and the proportion in favor of treatment. In this article, our focus is when all components are clinical end points such as death or hospitalizations and do not include continuous end points. We review these methods using HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training). We also describe recent methods for combining different clinical end points, which take into account the time a subject is in a particular clinical state. These include the pairwise win time, the restricted mean time in favor of treatment, the expected win time, and the expected win time against reference. We discuss the US Food and Drug Administration guidances and make general recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信