全身MRI与[18F]FDG PET/CT诊断和监测浆细胞瘤的比较研究。

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nieves Gómez León, Isabel Vicuña-Andrés, Beatriz Aguado-Bueno, Francisco Garrido-Enjamio, Itxaso Galán-González, Valentina Castillo-Morales, Adrián Alegre Amor, Roberto C Delgado Bolton
{"title":"全身MRI与[18F]FDG PET/CT诊断和监测浆细胞瘤的比较研究。","authors":"Nieves Gómez León, Isabel Vicuña-Andrés, Beatriz Aguado-Bueno, Francisco Garrido-Enjamio, Itxaso Galán-González, Valentina Castillo-Morales, Adrián Alegre Amor, Roberto C Delgado Bolton","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Current guidelines recommend [18F]FDG PET/CT as the preferred imaging modality for suspected extramedullary bone plasmacytomas, while whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is indicated for solitary bone plasmacytomas. Despite these recommendations, the available evidence comparing the diagnostic efficacy of both techniques remains limited. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the initial evaluation of plasmacytomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter, observational, and retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with plasmacytoma who underwent WB-MRI and/or [18F]FDG PET/CT as part of their diagnostic workup. Lesions identified were categorized by anatomic location, and concordance between WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT findings was assessed. The McNemar test and Pearson χ2 test were used to compare detection rates between WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 73 patients (33 men) recruited between 2012 and 2023, age range 30-94 years (mean 63.4 ± 12.2 y). Of these, 56 patients underwent both diagnostic tests. Diagnoses revealed solitary plasmacytoma in 16 patients, concurrent multiple myeloma (MM) and plasmacytoma in 18 patients, and plasmacytoma in 22 patients with a prior MM history. Out of the 56 plasmacytomas, 40 were osseous and 16 were extramedullary. WB-MRI detected 98.2% of plasmacytomas compared with 83.9% for [18F]FDG PET/CT, with a statistically significant difference of OR 9 (95% CI: 1.2-394.5), P=0.021. Concordance was very high for osseous plasmacytomas but moderate for extramedullary plasmacytomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest WB-MRI is an alternative to [18F]FDG PET/CT for detecting plasmacytomas. A comprehensive clinical and radiologic assessment is essential for the optimal evaluation of patients with plasmacytoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole-body MRI Versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing and Monitoring Plasmacytomas: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nieves Gómez León, Isabel Vicuña-Andrés, Beatriz Aguado-Bueno, Francisco Garrido-Enjamio, Itxaso Galán-González, Valentina Castillo-Morales, Adrián Alegre Amor, Roberto C Delgado Bolton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Current guidelines recommend [18F]FDG PET/CT as the preferred imaging modality for suspected extramedullary bone plasmacytomas, while whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is indicated for solitary bone plasmacytomas. Despite these recommendations, the available evidence comparing the diagnostic efficacy of both techniques remains limited. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the initial evaluation of plasmacytomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter, observational, and retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with plasmacytoma who underwent WB-MRI and/or [18F]FDG PET/CT as part of their diagnostic workup. Lesions identified were categorized by anatomic location, and concordance between WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT findings was assessed. The McNemar test and Pearson χ2 test were used to compare detection rates between WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 73 patients (33 men) recruited between 2012 and 2023, age range 30-94 years (mean 63.4 ± 12.2 y). Of these, 56 patients underwent both diagnostic tests. Diagnoses revealed solitary plasmacytoma in 16 patients, concurrent multiple myeloma (MM) and plasmacytoma in 18 patients, and plasmacytoma in 22 patients with a prior MM history. Out of the 56 plasmacytomas, 40 were osseous and 16 were extramedullary. WB-MRI detected 98.2% of plasmacytomas compared with 83.9% for [18F]FDG PET/CT, with a statistically significant difference of OR 9 (95% CI: 1.2-394.5), P=0.021. Concordance was very high for osseous plasmacytomas but moderate for extramedullary plasmacytomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest WB-MRI is an alternative to [18F]FDG PET/CT for detecting plasmacytomas. A comprehensive clinical and radiologic assessment is essential for the optimal evaluation of patients with plasmacytoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005954\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:目前的指南[18F]推荐FDG PET/CT作为疑似髓外骨浆细胞瘤的首选成像方式,而全身磁共振成像(WB-MRI)则适用于孤立性骨浆细胞瘤。尽管有这些建议,比较这两种技术诊断效能的现有证据仍然有限。本研究的目的是比较WB-MRI和[18F]FDG PET/CT在浆细胞瘤初步评估中的诊断效果。方法:我们对诊断为浆细胞瘤的患者进行了多中心、观察性和回顾性分析,这些患者接受了WB-MRI和/或[18F]FDG PET/CT作为诊断检查的一部分。根据解剖位置对发现的病变进行分类,并评估WB-MRI与[18F]FDG PET/CT检查结果的一致性。采用McNemar检验和Pearson χ2检验比较WB-MRI与[18F]FDG PET/CT的检出率。结果:该研究纳入了2012 - 2023年间招募的73例患者(男性33例),年龄30-94岁(平均63.4±12.2岁)。其中,56名患者接受了两种诊断测试。16例患者诊断为孤立性浆细胞瘤,18例患者并发多发性骨髓瘤和浆细胞瘤,22例患者既往有多发性骨髓瘤病史。56例浆细胞瘤中,40例为骨性瘤,16例为髓外瘤。WB-MRI浆细胞瘤检出率为98.2%,FDG PET/CT检出率为83.9%,差异有统计学意义(95% CI: 1.2 ~ 394.5), P=0.021。骨性浆细胞瘤的一致性非常高,但髓外浆细胞瘤的一致性中等。结论:这些发现表明,WB-MRI可以替代[18F]FDG PET/CT检测浆细胞瘤。全面的临床和放射学评估对于浆细胞瘤患者的最佳评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole-body MRI Versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing and Monitoring Plasmacytomas: A Comparative Study.

Background/objectives: Current guidelines recommend [18F]FDG PET/CT as the preferred imaging modality for suspected extramedullary bone plasmacytomas, while whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is indicated for solitary bone plasmacytomas. Despite these recommendations, the available evidence comparing the diagnostic efficacy of both techniques remains limited. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the initial evaluation of plasmacytomas.

Methods: We performed a multicenter, observational, and retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with plasmacytoma who underwent WB-MRI and/or [18F]FDG PET/CT as part of their diagnostic workup. Lesions identified were categorized by anatomic location, and concordance between WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT findings was assessed. The McNemar test and Pearson χ2 test were used to compare detection rates between WB-MRI and [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Results: The study included 73 patients (33 men) recruited between 2012 and 2023, age range 30-94 years (mean 63.4 ± 12.2 y). Of these, 56 patients underwent both diagnostic tests. Diagnoses revealed solitary plasmacytoma in 16 patients, concurrent multiple myeloma (MM) and plasmacytoma in 18 patients, and plasmacytoma in 22 patients with a prior MM history. Out of the 56 plasmacytomas, 40 were osseous and 16 were extramedullary. WB-MRI detected 98.2% of plasmacytomas compared with 83.9% for [18F]FDG PET/CT, with a statistically significant difference of OR 9 (95% CI: 1.2-394.5), P=0.021. Concordance was very high for osseous plasmacytomas but moderate for extramedullary plasmacytomas.

Conclusions: These findings suggest WB-MRI is an alternative to [18F]FDG PET/CT for detecting plasmacytomas. A comprehensive clinical and radiologic assessment is essential for the optimal evaluation of patients with plasmacytoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信