Victor Constantin Ștefănescu, Andreea-Marilena Ionescu, Sabrina Florentina Florea, Mihai Alexandru Vasile, Vlad Bătăilă, Daniel Cochior
{"title":"提高手术后恢复的影响。我们的研究结果。","authors":"Victor Constantin Ștefănescu, Andreea-Marilena Ionescu, Sabrina Florentina Florea, Mihai Alexandru Vasile, Vlad Bătăilă, Daniel Cochior","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program is a multimodal, evidence-based perioperative care pathway to improve postoperative recovery. This study evaluates the impact of ERAS implementation on clinical outcomes, with a focus on length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective-prospective cohort study involving 231 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: pre-ERAS (n=84, 2016â?\"2019) and ERAS (n=147, 2020 - 2023). The primary outcome was LOS, while secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and blood transfusion requirements. Statistical comparisons were made using the Student's t-test and the chi-square test, with significance defined as p 0.05. <b>Results:</b> ERAS implementation was associated with a significant reduction in LOS - from 10.3 days to 5.5 days (p 0.01). Although the overall complication rate did not differ significantly (p=0.15), fewer patients in the ERAS group experienced complications (10.5% vs 18.1%). No significant differences were found in rates of anastomotic leaks, surgical site infections, or postoperative transfusion. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol significantly reduced hospital stays without increasing postoperative morbidity in colorectal surgery patients. These findings support the clinical value and feasibility of the protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 2","pages":"159-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program Implementation. Our Results.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Constantin Ștefănescu, Andreea-Marilena Ionescu, Sabrina Florentina Florea, Mihai Alexandru Vasile, Vlad Bătăilă, Daniel Cochior\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.3118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program is a multimodal, evidence-based perioperative care pathway to improve postoperative recovery. This study evaluates the impact of ERAS implementation on clinical outcomes, with a focus on length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective-prospective cohort study involving 231 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: pre-ERAS (n=84, 2016â?\\\"2019) and ERAS (n=147, 2020 - 2023). The primary outcome was LOS, while secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and blood transfusion requirements. Statistical comparisons were made using the Student's t-test and the chi-square test, with significance defined as p 0.05. <b>Results:</b> ERAS implementation was associated with a significant reduction in LOS - from 10.3 days to 5.5 days (p 0.01). Although the overall complication rate did not differ significantly (p=0.15), fewer patients in the ERAS group experienced complications (10.5% vs 18.1%). No significant differences were found in rates of anastomotic leaks, surgical site infections, or postoperative transfusion. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol significantly reduced hospital stays without increasing postoperative morbidity in colorectal surgery patients. These findings support the clinical value and feasibility of the protocol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"120 2\",\"pages\":\"159-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery)项目是一种多模式、循证的围手术期护理途径,旨在改善术后恢复。本研究评估ERAS实施对临床结果的影响,重点关注结直肠手术患者的住院时间(LOS)和术后并发症。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性-前瞻性队列研究,涉及2016年至2023年间接受择期结肠直肠手术的231例患者。患者分为两组:era前期(n=84, 2016â?"2019)和ERAS (n=147, 2020 - 2023)。主要结局是LOS,次要结局包括术后并发症和输血需求。采用学生t检验和卡方检验进行统计学比较,显著性定义为p 0.05。结果:ERAS的实施与LOS的显著减少相关——从10.3天减少到5.5天(p 0.01)。虽然总并发症发生率没有显著差异(p=0.15),但ERAS组出现并发症的患者较少(10.5% vs 18.1%)。吻合口漏、手术部位感染或术后输血的发生率无显著差异。结论:ERAS方案显著减少了结直肠手术患者的住院时间,且未增加术后发病率。这些发现支持了该方案的临床价值和可行性。
Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program Implementation. Our Results.
Background: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program is a multimodal, evidence-based perioperative care pathway to improve postoperative recovery. This study evaluates the impact of ERAS implementation on clinical outcomes, with a focus on length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective-prospective cohort study involving 231 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: pre-ERAS (n=84, 2016â?"2019) and ERAS (n=147, 2020 - 2023). The primary outcome was LOS, while secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and blood transfusion requirements. Statistical comparisons were made using the Student's t-test and the chi-square test, with significance defined as p 0.05. Results: ERAS implementation was associated with a significant reduction in LOS - from 10.3 days to 5.5 days (p 0.01). Although the overall complication rate did not differ significantly (p=0.15), fewer patients in the ERAS group experienced complications (10.5% vs 18.1%). No significant differences were found in rates of anastomotic leaks, surgical site infections, or postoperative transfusion. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol significantly reduced hospital stays without increasing postoperative morbidity in colorectal surgery patients. These findings support the clinical value and feasibility of the protocol.
期刊介绍:
Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither
appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles,
new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and,
depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications.
Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of
Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and
participation notes in other scientific meetings.
Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain
substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please
submit these letters to the editor through our online system.