对文化助产师的过度依赖:将高风险流动妇女的沟通与关怀委托给文化助产师的悖论。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Birgitta Essén, Ayanthi Wickramasinghe, Lise Eriksson
{"title":"对文化助产师的过度依赖:将高风险流动妇女的沟通与关怀委托给文化助产师的悖论。","authors":"Birgitta Essén, Ayanthi Wickramasinghe, Lise Eriksson","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07700-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is widely recognized that migrant women from low-income countries are considered to be a group with increased obstetric challenges. To address these challenges, cultural doulas were introduced to provide continuous emotional and practical support during childbirth in Sweden. Leveraging their shared cultural background, language skills, and understanding, the idea behind these doulas was supposed to facilitate effective communication between the woman, her partner, and healthcare staff, with the assumption that this would lead to better maternity care for migrants. The aim of this study was to explore healthcare providers reflections on the role of cultural doulas and to explore their perceptions of cultural doulas' impact on childbirth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted in 2022, involving semi-structured interviews with 18 healthcare providers; obstetricians and midwives from two Swedish counties. The data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and discourse analysis, guided by Bacchi's 'What Is the Problem Represented to Be?'</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Bacchi's 'What Is the Problem Represented to Be?' approach, the analysis highlights how healthcare providers interpreted cultural doulas as an asset in relation to problems in migrants' maternity care. Three key discourses that emerged were: underlying social and cultural factors, assumptions of improved outcomes and integration, and cultural doulas as informal interpreters. Instead of emphasizing medical risks, healthcare providers focused on social risks and overlooked the importance of professional training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cultural doulas are recognized as valuable in addressing gaps in migrant maternity care, yet their role presents a paradox. Entrusting the care of high-risk migrant women to minimally trained non-medical professionals paradoxically risks miscommunication and compromised care quality. Insufficient training, unclear roles, and the overextension of cultural doulas further exacerbate this issue, underscoring the need for systemic reforms. To resolve this paradox and improve maternal outcomes, the maternity care system must redefine the role of cultural doulas, prioritize professional interpretation services, and implement integrated care models tailored to the evidence based medical needs of migrant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overreliance on cultural doulas: the paradox of entrusting the communication and care of high-risk migrant women to cultural doulas.\",\"authors\":\"Birgitta Essén, Ayanthi Wickramasinghe, Lise Eriksson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07700-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is widely recognized that migrant women from low-income countries are considered to be a group with increased obstetric challenges. To address these challenges, cultural doulas were introduced to provide continuous emotional and practical support during childbirth in Sweden. Leveraging their shared cultural background, language skills, and understanding, the idea behind these doulas was supposed to facilitate effective communication between the woman, her partner, and healthcare staff, with the assumption that this would lead to better maternity care for migrants. The aim of this study was to explore healthcare providers reflections on the role of cultural doulas and to explore their perceptions of cultural doulas' impact on childbirth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted in 2022, involving semi-structured interviews with 18 healthcare providers; obstetricians and midwives from two Swedish counties. The data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and discourse analysis, guided by Bacchi's 'What Is the Problem Represented to Be?'</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Bacchi's 'What Is the Problem Represented to Be?' approach, the analysis highlights how healthcare providers interpreted cultural doulas as an asset in relation to problems in migrants' maternity care. Three key discourses that emerged were: underlying social and cultural factors, assumptions of improved outcomes and integration, and cultural doulas as informal interpreters. Instead of emphasizing medical risks, healthcare providers focused on social risks and overlooked the importance of professional training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cultural doulas are recognized as valuable in addressing gaps in migrant maternity care, yet their role presents a paradox. Entrusting the care of high-risk migrant women to minimally trained non-medical professionals paradoxically risks miscommunication and compromised care quality. Insufficient training, unclear roles, and the overextension of cultural doulas further exacerbate this issue, underscoring the need for systemic reforms. To resolve this paradox and improve maternal outcomes, the maternity care system must redefine the role of cultural doulas, prioritize professional interpretation services, and implement integrated care models tailored to the evidence based medical needs of migrant women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07700-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07700-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们普遍认识到,来自低收入国家的移民妇女被认为是一个面临更多产科挑战的群体。为了应对这些挑战,瑞典引入了文化助产师,在分娩期间提供持续的情感和实际支持。利用她们共同的文化背景、语言技能和理解,这些助产师背后的想法应该是促进妇女、她的伴侣和医疗保健人员之间的有效沟通,并假设这将为移民提供更好的产妇护理。本研究的目的是探讨医疗保健提供者对文化助产师角色的反思,并探讨他们对文化助产师对分娩影响的看法。方法:在2022年进行了一项定性研究,包括对18名医疗保健提供者的半结构化访谈;来自瑞典两个县的产科医生和助产士数据分析采用反身性主题分析和话语分析,以巴赫的“问题代表是什么?”方法:结果:使用巴克奇的“问题代表的是什么?”的方法,分析突出了医疗保健提供者如何解释文化助产师作为一种资产,关系到移民的产妇护理问题。出现的三个关键话语是:潜在的社会和文化因素,改善结果和整合的假设,以及作为非正式口译员的文化助产师。医疗服务提供者没有强调医疗风险,而是把重点放在社会风险上,忽视了专业培训的重要性。结论:文化助产师在解决移民产妇护理差距方面被认为是有价值的,但他们的角色呈现出一个悖论。将高风险移徙妇女的护理委托给受过最低限度培训的非医疗专业人员,可能会出现沟通不端和护理质量受损的风险。培训不足、角色不明确以及文化助产师的过度扩张进一步加剧了这一问题,强调了系统性改革的必要性。为了解决这一矛盾并改善产妇结局,产科护理系统必须重新定义文化助产师的角色,优先考虑专业口译服务,并实施针对移民妇女循证医疗需求的综合护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overreliance on cultural doulas: the paradox of entrusting the communication and care of high-risk migrant women to cultural doulas.

Background: It is widely recognized that migrant women from low-income countries are considered to be a group with increased obstetric challenges. To address these challenges, cultural doulas were introduced to provide continuous emotional and practical support during childbirth in Sweden. Leveraging their shared cultural background, language skills, and understanding, the idea behind these doulas was supposed to facilitate effective communication between the woman, her partner, and healthcare staff, with the assumption that this would lead to better maternity care for migrants. The aim of this study was to explore healthcare providers reflections on the role of cultural doulas and to explore their perceptions of cultural doulas' impact on childbirth.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in 2022, involving semi-structured interviews with 18 healthcare providers; obstetricians and midwives from two Swedish counties. The data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and discourse analysis, guided by Bacchi's 'What Is the Problem Represented to Be?'

Approach:

Results: Using Bacchi's 'What Is the Problem Represented to Be?' approach, the analysis highlights how healthcare providers interpreted cultural doulas as an asset in relation to problems in migrants' maternity care. Three key discourses that emerged were: underlying social and cultural factors, assumptions of improved outcomes and integration, and cultural doulas as informal interpreters. Instead of emphasizing medical risks, healthcare providers focused on social risks and overlooked the importance of professional training.

Conclusions: Cultural doulas are recognized as valuable in addressing gaps in migrant maternity care, yet their role presents a paradox. Entrusting the care of high-risk migrant women to minimally trained non-medical professionals paradoxically risks miscommunication and compromised care quality. Insufficient training, unclear roles, and the overextension of cultural doulas further exacerbate this issue, underscoring the need for systemic reforms. To resolve this paradox and improve maternal outcomes, the maternity care system must redefine the role of cultural doulas, prioritize professional interpretation services, and implement integrated care models tailored to the evidence based medical needs of migrant women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信