双胎妊娠的预后营养指数与子痫前期有关。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Qing Han, Shuisen Zheng, Xiaoling Chen, Yuting Gao, Huale Zhang, Na Lin
{"title":"双胎妊娠的预后营养指数与子痫前期有关。","authors":"Qing Han, Shuisen Zheng, Xiaoling Chen, Yuting Gao, Huale Zhang, Na Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07669-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the relationship between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) during the third trimester and the risk of preeclampsia (PE) in twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 2998 twin pregnancies were enrolled in Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021, including preeclampsia group (n = 421) and control group (n = 2577). The significance of the characteristic variables in predicting PE in twin pregnancies were calculated using the random forest algorithm (Boruta package) and the correlation between PNI and PE in twin pregnancies was examined in three distinct models using multivariable logistic regression corrected for confounders. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability for PNI to predict PE in twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PNI (37.92 ± 3.86 vs. 40.57 ± 3.63, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the PE group than in the control group. After adjusting for all covariates, the PNI was negatively associated with PE in twin pregnancies (OR = 0.780; 95% CI: 0.753, 0.808). Meanwhile, the higher PNI remained an independent protective factor for PE in twin pregnancies compared to lower PNI (OR, 95% CI: 0.410, 0.438-0.530; 0.144, 0.103-0.201) in sensitivity analysis. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.691 for PNI and the cut-off value of PNI was 40.162.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNI was negatively correlated with the risk of PE in twin pregnancies, which may help in risk assessment for twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic nutritional index is associated with preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.\",\"authors\":\"Qing Han, Shuisen Zheng, Xiaoling Chen, Yuting Gao, Huale Zhang, Na Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07669-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the relationship between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) during the third trimester and the risk of preeclampsia (PE) in twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 2998 twin pregnancies were enrolled in Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021, including preeclampsia group (n = 421) and control group (n = 2577). The significance of the characteristic variables in predicting PE in twin pregnancies were calculated using the random forest algorithm (Boruta package) and the correlation between PNI and PE in twin pregnancies was examined in three distinct models using multivariable logistic regression corrected for confounders. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability for PNI to predict PE in twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PNI (37.92 ± 3.86 vs. 40.57 ± 3.63, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the PE group than in the control group. After adjusting for all covariates, the PNI was negatively associated with PE in twin pregnancies (OR = 0.780; 95% CI: 0.753, 0.808). Meanwhile, the higher PNI remained an independent protective factor for PE in twin pregnancies compared to lower PNI (OR, 95% CI: 0.410, 0.438-0.530; 0.144, 0.103-0.201) in sensitivity analysis. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.691 for PNI and the cut-off value of PNI was 40.162.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNI was negatively correlated with the risk of PE in twin pregnancies, which may help in risk assessment for twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07669-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07669-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨双胎妊娠晚期预后营养指数(PNI)与先兆子痫(PE)风险的关系。方法:2015年1月至2021年12月福建省妇幼保健院共纳入2998例双胎妊娠,其中先兆子痫组(n = 421)和对照组(n = 2577)。使用随机森林算法(Boruta软件包)计算特征变量预测双胎妊娠PE的显著性,并使用校正混杂因素的多变量logistic回归在三种不同模型中检验双胎妊娠PNI与PE之间的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价PNI预测双胎妊娠PE的能力。结果:PNI(37.92±3.86)比(40.57±3.63)P。结论:PNI与双胎妊娠PE风险呈负相关,有助于双胎妊娠风险评估。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The prognostic nutritional index is associated with preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the relationship between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) during the third trimester and the risk of preeclampsia (PE) in twin pregnancies.

Method: A total of 2998 twin pregnancies were enrolled in Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021, including preeclampsia group (n = 421) and control group (n = 2577). The significance of the characteristic variables in predicting PE in twin pregnancies were calculated using the random forest algorithm (Boruta package) and the correlation between PNI and PE in twin pregnancies was examined in three distinct models using multivariable logistic regression corrected for confounders. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability for PNI to predict PE in twin pregnancies.

Results: PNI (37.92 ± 3.86 vs. 40.57 ± 3.63, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the PE group than in the control group. After adjusting for all covariates, the PNI was negatively associated with PE in twin pregnancies (OR = 0.780; 95% CI: 0.753, 0.808). Meanwhile, the higher PNI remained an independent protective factor for PE in twin pregnancies compared to lower PNI (OR, 95% CI: 0.410, 0.438-0.530; 0.144, 0.103-0.201) in sensitivity analysis. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.691 for PNI and the cut-off value of PNI was 40.162.

Conclusion: PNI was negatively correlated with the risk of PE in twin pregnancies, which may help in risk assessment for twin pregnancies.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信