{"title":"生物牙本质,NeoMTA 2和NeoPUTTY在初级牙髓切开术中渗透到牙本质小管:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜分析。","authors":"Merve Ozdemir, Aysenur Oncu","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06065-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulpotomy is an accepted treatment option to preserve primary teeth with exposed pulp due to caries or trauma and to ensure proper function until physiologic exfoliation. This study aimed to assess the dentin penetration of NeoMTA 2, NeoPUTTY, and Biodentine using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was performed using 42 freshly extracted lower primary molars. All samples were divided into 3 separate groups and the Biodentine, NeoMTA 2, and NeoPUTTY were placed on the cavity floor, respectively. High-speed diamond discs were used to create 2-mm-thick sections from the furcation region, including a 1- mm crown and 1-mm root. Primary molar tooth sections were placed on a glass slide and examined using a CLSM (LSM 980, Zeiss, Germany). All images were analyzed using ImageJ/Fiji (National Institute of Health, USA) software for the measurement of penetration depth. The penetration depth of the materials was evaluated using one- way ANOVA, and the Tukey test was used for comparisons between groups at p < 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in penetration depth between the Biodentine and NeoMTA 2 materials. NeoPUTTY showed higher penetration depth than Biodentine and NeoMTA 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reported that NeoPUTTY showed higher dentinal tubule penetration in primary teeth than NeoMTA 2 and Biodentine as pulpotomy materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penetration of Biodentine, NeoMTA 2, and NeoPUTTY into dentinal tubules in primary tooth pulpotomy: a confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Merve Ozdemir, Aysenur Oncu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-06065-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulpotomy is an accepted treatment option to preserve primary teeth with exposed pulp due to caries or trauma and to ensure proper function until physiologic exfoliation. This study aimed to assess the dentin penetration of NeoMTA 2, NeoPUTTY, and Biodentine using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was performed using 42 freshly extracted lower primary molars. All samples were divided into 3 separate groups and the Biodentine, NeoMTA 2, and NeoPUTTY were placed on the cavity floor, respectively. High-speed diamond discs were used to create 2-mm-thick sections from the furcation region, including a 1- mm crown and 1-mm root. Primary molar tooth sections were placed on a glass slide and examined using a CLSM (LSM 980, Zeiss, Germany). All images were analyzed using ImageJ/Fiji (National Institute of Health, USA) software for the measurement of penetration depth. The penetration depth of the materials was evaluated using one- way ANOVA, and the Tukey test was used for comparisons between groups at p < 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in penetration depth between the Biodentine and NeoMTA 2 materials. NeoPUTTY showed higher penetration depth than Biodentine and NeoMTA 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reported that NeoPUTTY showed higher dentinal tubule penetration in primary teeth than NeoMTA 2 and Biodentine as pulpotomy materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06065-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06065-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Penetration of Biodentine, NeoMTA 2, and NeoPUTTY into dentinal tubules in primary tooth pulpotomy: a confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis.
Background: Pulpotomy is an accepted treatment option to preserve primary teeth with exposed pulp due to caries or trauma and to ensure proper function until physiologic exfoliation. This study aimed to assess the dentin penetration of NeoMTA 2, NeoPUTTY, and Biodentine using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).
Methods: The present study was performed using 42 freshly extracted lower primary molars. All samples were divided into 3 separate groups and the Biodentine, NeoMTA 2, and NeoPUTTY were placed on the cavity floor, respectively. High-speed diamond discs were used to create 2-mm-thick sections from the furcation region, including a 1- mm crown and 1-mm root. Primary molar tooth sections were placed on a glass slide and examined using a CLSM (LSM 980, Zeiss, Germany). All images were analyzed using ImageJ/Fiji (National Institute of Health, USA) software for the measurement of penetration depth. The penetration depth of the materials was evaluated using one- way ANOVA, and the Tukey test was used for comparisons between groups at p < 0.05 significance level.
Results: There was no significant difference in penetration depth between the Biodentine and NeoMTA 2 materials. NeoPUTTY showed higher penetration depth than Biodentine and NeoMTA 2.
Conclusions: This study reported that NeoPUTTY showed higher dentinal tubule penetration in primary teeth than NeoMTA 2 and Biodentine as pulpotomy materials.
期刊介绍:
BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.