Murat Çap, Medeni Karaduman, Tingquan Zhou, Emrah Erdoğan, İbrahim H Tanboğa, Vincenzo Tufaro, Xingwei He, Retesh Bajaj, Nathan Angelo Lecaros Yap, Ameer H Khan, Bon-Kwon Koo, Roby Rakhit, Grigoris V Karamasis, Zaid Ali Abdulelah, Alun Hughes, Patrick W Serruys, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Ryo Torii, Jean-Paul Aben, Christos V Bourantas
{"title":"从冠状动脉造影图像中快速计算血流速度的自动用户友好软件。","authors":"Murat Çap, Medeni Karaduman, Tingquan Zhou, Emrah Erdoğan, İbrahim H Tanboğa, Vincenzo Tufaro, Xingwei He, Retesh Bajaj, Nathan Angelo Lecaros Yap, Ameer H Khan, Bon-Kwon Koo, Roby Rakhit, Grigoris V Karamasis, Zaid Ali Abdulelah, Alun Hughes, Patrick W Serruys, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Ryo Torii, Jean-Paul Aben, Christos V Bourantas","doi":"10.1177/00033197251338474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count enables assessment of coronary flow but cannot measure coronary flow velocity (CFV), which is needed to examine microvascular function. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a semi-automated software for fast CFV computation using contrast bolus tracking techniques in angiography and compare its performance against experts. The study included patients undergoing coronary angiography. Two experts measured the CFV using the number of frames, segment length, and frame rate. Measurements were repeated for shorter segments and different projections, and their estimations were compared with the software. In total, 123 patients (152 vessels) were included. The software had excellent reproducibility in measuring CFV (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .995), which was superior to experts (ICC = .946) and provided similar estimations irrespective of the segment length (ICC = .992); conversely, the experts overestimated CFV in short segments. The reproducibility of the experts and the software was moderate when comparing CFV measurements in different projections (first expert vs software ICC = .807, second expert vs software ICC = .790, first expert vs second expert ICC = .885). The software provides reproducible CFV estimations that are close to experts' estimations. Further validation against wire-based functional techniques is needed to examine its potential in assessing microvascular function.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"33197251338474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automated User-friendly Software for Fast Computation of Blood Flow Velocity From Coronary Angiographic Images.\",\"authors\":\"Murat Çap, Medeni Karaduman, Tingquan Zhou, Emrah Erdoğan, İbrahim H Tanboğa, Vincenzo Tufaro, Xingwei He, Retesh Bajaj, Nathan Angelo Lecaros Yap, Ameer H Khan, Bon-Kwon Koo, Roby Rakhit, Grigoris V Karamasis, Zaid Ali Abdulelah, Alun Hughes, Patrick W Serruys, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Ryo Torii, Jean-Paul Aben, Christos V Bourantas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00033197251338474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count enables assessment of coronary flow but cannot measure coronary flow velocity (CFV), which is needed to examine microvascular function. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a semi-automated software for fast CFV computation using contrast bolus tracking techniques in angiography and compare its performance against experts. The study included patients undergoing coronary angiography. Two experts measured the CFV using the number of frames, segment length, and frame rate. Measurements were repeated for shorter segments and different projections, and their estimations were compared with the software. In total, 123 patients (152 vessels) were included. The software had excellent reproducibility in measuring CFV (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .995), which was superior to experts (ICC = .946) and provided similar estimations irrespective of the segment length (ICC = .992); conversely, the experts overestimated CFV in short segments. The reproducibility of the experts and the software was moderate when comparing CFV measurements in different projections (first expert vs software ICC = .807, second expert vs software ICC = .790, first expert vs second expert ICC = .885). The software provides reproducible CFV estimations that are close to experts' estimations. Further validation against wire-based functional techniques is needed to examine its potential in assessing microvascular function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33197251338474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197251338474\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197251338474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Automated User-friendly Software for Fast Computation of Blood Flow Velocity From Coronary Angiographic Images.
Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count enables assessment of coronary flow but cannot measure coronary flow velocity (CFV), which is needed to examine microvascular function. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a semi-automated software for fast CFV computation using contrast bolus tracking techniques in angiography and compare its performance against experts. The study included patients undergoing coronary angiography. Two experts measured the CFV using the number of frames, segment length, and frame rate. Measurements were repeated for shorter segments and different projections, and their estimations were compared with the software. In total, 123 patients (152 vessels) were included. The software had excellent reproducibility in measuring CFV (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .995), which was superior to experts (ICC = .946) and provided similar estimations irrespective of the segment length (ICC = .992); conversely, the experts overestimated CFV in short segments. The reproducibility of the experts and the software was moderate when comparing CFV measurements in different projections (first expert vs software ICC = .807, second expert vs software ICC = .790, first expert vs second expert ICC = .885). The software provides reproducible CFV estimations that are close to experts' estimations. Further validation against wire-based functional techniques is needed to examine its potential in assessing microvascular function.
期刊介绍:
A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days