从冠状动脉造影图像中快速计算血流速度的自动用户友好软件。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Murat Çap, Medeni Karaduman, Tingquan Zhou, Emrah Erdoğan, İbrahim H Tanboğa, Vincenzo Tufaro, Xingwei He, Retesh Bajaj, Nathan Angelo Lecaros Yap, Ameer H Khan, Bon-Kwon Koo, Roby Rakhit, Grigoris V Karamasis, Zaid Ali Abdulelah, Alun Hughes, Patrick W Serruys, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Ryo Torii, Jean-Paul Aben, Christos V Bourantas
{"title":"从冠状动脉造影图像中快速计算血流速度的自动用户友好软件。","authors":"Murat Çap, Medeni Karaduman, Tingquan Zhou, Emrah Erdoğan, İbrahim H Tanboğa, Vincenzo Tufaro, Xingwei He, Retesh Bajaj, Nathan Angelo Lecaros Yap, Ameer H Khan, Bon-Kwon Koo, Roby Rakhit, Grigoris V Karamasis, Zaid Ali Abdulelah, Alun Hughes, Patrick W Serruys, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Ryo Torii, Jean-Paul Aben, Christos V Bourantas","doi":"10.1177/00033197251338474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count enables assessment of coronary flow but cannot measure coronary flow velocity (CFV), which is needed to examine microvascular function. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a semi-automated software for fast CFV computation using contrast bolus tracking techniques in angiography and compare its performance against experts. The study included patients undergoing coronary angiography. Two experts measured the CFV using the number of frames, segment length, and frame rate. Measurements were repeated for shorter segments and different projections, and their estimations were compared with the software. In total, 123 patients (152 vessels) were included. The software had excellent reproducibility in measuring CFV (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .995), which was superior to experts (ICC = .946) and provided similar estimations irrespective of the segment length (ICC = .992); conversely, the experts overestimated CFV in short segments. The reproducibility of the experts and the software was moderate when comparing CFV measurements in different projections (first expert vs software ICC = .807, second expert vs software ICC = .790, first expert vs second expert ICC = .885). The software provides reproducible CFV estimations that are close to experts' estimations. Further validation against wire-based functional techniques is needed to examine its potential in assessing microvascular function.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"33197251338474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automated User-friendly Software for Fast Computation of Blood Flow Velocity From Coronary Angiographic Images.\",\"authors\":\"Murat Çap, Medeni Karaduman, Tingquan Zhou, Emrah Erdoğan, İbrahim H Tanboğa, Vincenzo Tufaro, Xingwei He, Retesh Bajaj, Nathan Angelo Lecaros Yap, Ameer H Khan, Bon-Kwon Koo, Roby Rakhit, Grigoris V Karamasis, Zaid Ali Abdulelah, Alun Hughes, Patrick W Serruys, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Ryo Torii, Jean-Paul Aben, Christos V Bourantas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00033197251338474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count enables assessment of coronary flow but cannot measure coronary flow velocity (CFV), which is needed to examine microvascular function. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a semi-automated software for fast CFV computation using contrast bolus tracking techniques in angiography and compare its performance against experts. The study included patients undergoing coronary angiography. Two experts measured the CFV using the number of frames, segment length, and frame rate. Measurements were repeated for shorter segments and different projections, and their estimations were compared with the software. In total, 123 patients (152 vessels) were included. The software had excellent reproducibility in measuring CFV (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .995), which was superior to experts (ICC = .946) and provided similar estimations irrespective of the segment length (ICC = .992); conversely, the experts overestimated CFV in short segments. The reproducibility of the experts and the software was moderate when comparing CFV measurements in different projections (first expert vs software ICC = .807, second expert vs software ICC = .790, first expert vs second expert ICC = .885). The software provides reproducible CFV estimations that are close to experts' estimations. Further validation against wire-based functional techniques is needed to examine its potential in assessing microvascular function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33197251338474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197251338474\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197251338474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心肌梗死框架计数中的溶栓可以评估冠状动脉血流,但不能测量冠状动脉血流速度(CFV),而CFV是检查微血管功能所必需的。为了克服这一限制,我们引入了一种半自动软件,用于在血管造影中使用造影剂跟踪技术快速计算CFV,并将其性能与专家进行比较。该研究包括接受冠状动脉造影的患者。两位专家使用帧数、片段长度和帧速率来测量CFV。对较短的片段和不同的投影重复测量,并将其估计与软件进行比较。共纳入123例患者(152条血管)。该软件在测量CFV方面具有良好的再现性(类内相关系数(ICC) = .995),优于专家(ICC = .946),并且无论片段长度如何(ICC = .992)都能提供相似的估计;相反,专家们高估了短段的CFV。当比较不同预测的CFV测量值时,专家和软件的可重复性是中等的(第一个专家vs软件ICC =。第二专家vs软件ICC =。790,第一专家vs第二专家ICC = .885)。该软件提供了可重复的CFV估计,接近专家的估计。需要对基于导线的功能技术进行进一步验证,以检查其在评估微血管功能方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Automated User-friendly Software for Fast Computation of Blood Flow Velocity From Coronary Angiographic Images.

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count enables assessment of coronary flow but cannot measure coronary flow velocity (CFV), which is needed to examine microvascular function. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a semi-automated software for fast CFV computation using contrast bolus tracking techniques in angiography and compare its performance against experts. The study included patients undergoing coronary angiography. Two experts measured the CFV using the number of frames, segment length, and frame rate. Measurements were repeated for shorter segments and different projections, and their estimations were compared with the software. In total, 123 patients (152 vessels) were included. The software had excellent reproducibility in measuring CFV (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .995), which was superior to experts (ICC = .946) and provided similar estimations irrespective of the segment length (ICC = .992); conversely, the experts overestimated CFV in short segments. The reproducibility of the experts and the software was moderate when comparing CFV measurements in different projections (first expert vs software ICC = .807, second expert vs software ICC = .790, first expert vs second expert ICC = .885). The software provides reproducible CFV estimations that are close to experts' estimations. Further validation against wire-based functional techniques is needed to examine its potential in assessing microvascular function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信