Michael S Kaminer, Rui L Avelar, Leslie Baumann, Valerie Callender, Steven H Dayan, Jeremy B Green, Steven K Grekin, Sebastien Guyon
{"title":"冷交联透明质酸填充剂的长期安全性和有效性:多中心、随机、对照、双盲研究。","authors":"Michael S Kaminer, Rui L Avelar, Leslie Baumann, Valerie Callender, Steven H Dayan, Jeremy B Green, Steven K Grekin, Sebastien Guyon","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evolysse Form (EVLF) and Evolysse Smooth (EVLS) (Symatese, Chaponost, France) are new hyaluronic acid fillers created using an innovative cold-crosslinking process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors of this study aim to collect safety and effectiveness data on new cold-crosslinked fillers to support the US approval for the correction of moderate-to-severe dynamic facial wrinkles and folds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, controlled, split-face study, 140 patients with moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) received a cold-crosslinked filler in 1 NLF (EVLF = 70, EVLS = 70) and a traditionally crosslinked filler, Restylane-L (RESL), in the contralateral fold and were followed through 12 months with an optional retreatment at that time point and subsequent 3 months of safety follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint of mean Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale change from baseline to Month 6 as rated by the photographic review panel demonstrated noninferiority and statistical superiority for the cold-crosslinked fillers. Blinded evaluator Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale assessments showed a mean change from baseline that was statistically significantly better than RESL for EVLF at all visits through 12 months and for EVLS at 6 and 9 months. Most patients were responders on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale throughout the study, according to ratings by blinded evaluators, treating investigators, and patients. The FACE-Q appraisal of NLFs' overall mean score showed significant improvement from baseline (P < .0001) at all time points through Month 12 for all treatment groups. All treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new cold-crosslinked fillers were shown to be safe and effective for correction of NLFs, with results lasting for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 1 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"842-849"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Cold-Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael S Kaminer, Rui L Avelar, Leslie Baumann, Valerie Callender, Steven H Dayan, Jeremy B Green, Steven K Grekin, Sebastien Guyon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evolysse Form (EVLF) and Evolysse Smooth (EVLS) (Symatese, Chaponost, France) are new hyaluronic acid fillers created using an innovative cold-crosslinking process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors of this study aim to collect safety and effectiveness data on new cold-crosslinked fillers to support the US approval for the correction of moderate-to-severe dynamic facial wrinkles and folds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, controlled, split-face study, 140 patients with moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) received a cold-crosslinked filler in 1 NLF (EVLF = 70, EVLS = 70) and a traditionally crosslinked filler, Restylane-L (RESL), in the contralateral fold and were followed through 12 months with an optional retreatment at that time point and subsequent 3 months of safety follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint of mean Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale change from baseline to Month 6 as rated by the photographic review panel demonstrated noninferiority and statistical superiority for the cold-crosslinked fillers. Blinded evaluator Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale assessments showed a mean change from baseline that was statistically significantly better than RESL for EVLF at all visits through 12 months and for EVLS at 6 and 9 months. Most patients were responders on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale throughout the study, according to ratings by blinded evaluators, treating investigators, and patients. The FACE-Q appraisal of NLFs' overall mean score showed significant improvement from baseline (P < .0001) at all time points through Month 12 for all treatment groups. All treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new cold-crosslinked fillers were shown to be safe and effective for correction of NLFs, with results lasting for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 1 (therapeutic): </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"842-849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Cold-Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study.
Background: Evolysse Form (EVLF) and Evolysse Smooth (EVLS) (Symatese, Chaponost, France) are new hyaluronic acid fillers created using an innovative cold-crosslinking process.
Objectives: The authors of this study aim to collect safety and effectiveness data on new cold-crosslinked fillers to support the US approval for the correction of moderate-to-severe dynamic facial wrinkles and folds.
Methods: In this randomized, controlled, split-face study, 140 patients with moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) received a cold-crosslinked filler in 1 NLF (EVLF = 70, EVLS = 70) and a traditionally crosslinked filler, Restylane-L (RESL), in the contralateral fold and were followed through 12 months with an optional retreatment at that time point and subsequent 3 months of safety follow-up.
Results: The primary endpoint of mean Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale change from baseline to Month 6 as rated by the photographic review panel demonstrated noninferiority and statistical superiority for the cold-crosslinked fillers. Blinded evaluator Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale assessments showed a mean change from baseline that was statistically significantly better than RESL for EVLF at all visits through 12 months and for EVLS at 6 and 9 months. Most patients were responders on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale throughout the study, according to ratings by blinded evaluators, treating investigators, and patients. The FACE-Q appraisal of NLFs' overall mean score showed significant improvement from baseline (P < .0001) at all time points through Month 12 for all treatment groups. All treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusions: The new cold-crosslinked fillers were shown to be safe and effective for correction of NLFs, with results lasting for 1 year.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.