使用丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI)预测心力衰竭死亡率。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Usama Sikandar, Kasper Bonnesen, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, Morten Schmidt
{"title":"使用丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI)预测心力衰竭死亡率。","authors":"Usama Sikandar, Kasper Bonnesen, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, Morten Schmidt","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2025.2452131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with congestive heart failure (HF) are often burdened with comorbidities that increase mortality. Comorbidity indices provide a standardised method to measure comorbidity burden and predict prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI) can discriminate mortality in patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based cohort study of all adult Danish patients with first-time HF during 1995-2020 (<i>N</i> = 311,628). We used logistic regression to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality within 30 days, 1 year, and 10 years of diagnosis. The AUCs were computed for a model including age and sex (baseline) and models also including the DANCAMI, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), or the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all-cause mortality, the AUCs were higher for the DANCAMI than for the baseline model (30-day: 0.688 vs. 0.662; 1-year: 0.715 vs. 0.680; 10-year: 0.840 vs. 0.810). For cardiovascular mortality, the AUCs were comparable between the DANCAMI and the baseline model (30-day: 0.683 vs. 0.676; 1-year: 0.690 vs. 0.684; 10-year: 0.659 vs. 0.658). For both 30-day, 1-year, and 10-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, the AUCs for the CCI and the ECI were comparable to those for the DANCAMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding the DANCAMI to a model including patient age and sex improved discrimination of short and long-term all-cause mortality but not of cardiovascular mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting heart failure mortality using the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI).\",\"authors\":\"Usama Sikandar, Kasper Bonnesen, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, Morten Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00015385.2025.2452131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with congestive heart failure (HF) are often burdened with comorbidities that increase mortality. Comorbidity indices provide a standardised method to measure comorbidity burden and predict prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI) can discriminate mortality in patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based cohort study of all adult Danish patients with first-time HF during 1995-2020 (<i>N</i> = 311,628). We used logistic regression to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality within 30 days, 1 year, and 10 years of diagnosis. The AUCs were computed for a model including age and sex (baseline) and models also including the DANCAMI, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), or the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all-cause mortality, the AUCs were higher for the DANCAMI than for the baseline model (30-day: 0.688 vs. 0.662; 1-year: 0.715 vs. 0.680; 10-year: 0.840 vs. 0.810). For cardiovascular mortality, the AUCs were comparable between the DANCAMI and the baseline model (30-day: 0.683 vs. 0.676; 1-year: 0.690 vs. 0.684; 10-year: 0.659 vs. 0.658). For both 30-day, 1-year, and 10-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, the AUCs for the CCI and the ECI were comparable to those for the DANCAMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding the DANCAMI to a model including patient age and sex improved discrimination of short and long-term all-cause mortality but not of cardiovascular mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta cardiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta cardiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2025.2452131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cardiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2025.2452131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:充血性心力衰竭(HF)患者通常伴有增加死亡率的合并症。共病指数为衡量共病负担和预测预后提供了一种标准化的方法。我们的目的是研究丹麦急性心肌梗死合并症指数(DANCAMI)是否可以区分心衰患者的死亡率。方法:我们开展了一项基于人群的队列研究,研究对象为1995-2020年期间所有丹麦成年首次心衰患者(N = 311,628)。我们使用逻辑回归来计算诊断后30天、1年和10年内心血管和全因死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。计算auc的模型包括年龄和性别(基线),模型还包括DANCAMI、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)或Elixhauser合并症指数(ECI)。结果:对于全因死亡率,DANCAMI的auc高于基线模型(30天:0.688 vs 0.662;1年:0.715 vs. 0.680;10年:0.840对0.810)。对于心血管死亡率,DANCAMI和基线模型之间的auc具有可比性(30天:0.683 vs 0.676;1年:0.690 vs. 0.684;10年:0.659 vs. 0.658)。对于30天、1年和10年的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率,CCI和ECI的auc与DANCAMI相当。结论:将DANCAMI添加到包含患者年龄和性别的模型中,可以改善短期和长期全因死亡率的区分,但不能改善心血管死亡率的区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting heart failure mortality using the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI).

Background: Patients with congestive heart failure (HF) are often burdened with comorbidities that increase mortality. Comorbidity indices provide a standardised method to measure comorbidity burden and predict prognosis. We aimed to investigate whether the Danish Comorbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI) can discriminate mortality in patients with HF.

Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study of all adult Danish patients with first-time HF during 1995-2020 (N = 311,628). We used logistic regression to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality within 30 days, 1 year, and 10 years of diagnosis. The AUCs were computed for a model including age and sex (baseline) and models also including the DANCAMI, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), or the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).

Results: For all-cause mortality, the AUCs were higher for the DANCAMI than for the baseline model (30-day: 0.688 vs. 0.662; 1-year: 0.715 vs. 0.680; 10-year: 0.840 vs. 0.810). For cardiovascular mortality, the AUCs were comparable between the DANCAMI and the baseline model (30-day: 0.683 vs. 0.676; 1-year: 0.690 vs. 0.684; 10-year: 0.659 vs. 0.658). For both 30-day, 1-year, and 10-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, the AUCs for the CCI and the ECI were comparable to those for the DANCAMI.

Conclusions: Adding the DANCAMI to a model including patient age and sex improved discrimination of short and long-term all-cause mortality but not of cardiovascular mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta cardiologica
Acta cardiologica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
115
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica is an international journal. It publishes bi-monthly original, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease including observational studies, clinical trials, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance and tutorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信