极低频磁场的致癌性:动物研究的系统综述。

IF 7.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jukka Luukkonen, Päivi Roivainen, Valtteri Nieminen, Jonne Naarala, Ehab Mustafa, Jukka Juutilainen
{"title":"极低频磁场的致癌性:动物研究的系统综述。","authors":"Jukka Luukkonen, Päivi Roivainen, Valtteri Nieminen, Jonne Naarala, Ehab Mustafa, Jukka Juutilainen","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2025.121819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Possible carcinogenicity of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (MFs), associated with the use and transmission of electricity, has been under scientific and public debate for decades. This review aims to provide an update on studies testing carcinogenicity of ELF MFs in experimental animals. Emphasis was placed on identifying possible connections between study characteristics and the results obtained. This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, and the methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies developed by the National Toxicology Program's Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). Publication bias was assessed using the caliper test. Fifty-four eligible studies were identified. Despite poor ratings in certain aspects of the risk of bias evaluation, the quality of the studies was generally relatively good, with only four studies receiving the weakest rating. Overall, there was very little evidence that ELF MFs alone are carcinogenic. Evidence of co-carcinogenicity, from studies that have used ELF MFs in combination with other agents, remains inconclusive. A clear indication of publication bias was observed, though it is unlikely that this bias alone explains all reported MF-modified effects. Based on the current literature, future studies on co-carcinogenicity of ELF MFs should employ approaches other than classical initiation-promotion models. Additionally, well-designed studies to better understand the reported effects of ELF MFs and the underlying mechanisms are warmly welcomed.</p>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":" ","pages":"121819"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carcinogenicity of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields: A systematic review of animal studies.\",\"authors\":\"Jukka Luukkonen, Päivi Roivainen, Valtteri Nieminen, Jonne Naarala, Ehab Mustafa, Jukka Juutilainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envres.2025.121819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Possible carcinogenicity of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (MFs), associated with the use and transmission of electricity, has been under scientific and public debate for decades. This review aims to provide an update on studies testing carcinogenicity of ELF MFs in experimental animals. Emphasis was placed on identifying possible connections between study characteristics and the results obtained. This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, and the methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies developed by the National Toxicology Program's Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). Publication bias was assessed using the caliper test. Fifty-four eligible studies were identified. Despite poor ratings in certain aspects of the risk of bias evaluation, the quality of the studies was generally relatively good, with only four studies receiving the weakest rating. Overall, there was very little evidence that ELF MFs alone are carcinogenic. Evidence of co-carcinogenicity, from studies that have used ELF MFs in combination with other agents, remains inconclusive. A clear indication of publication bias was observed, though it is unlikely that this bias alone explains all reported MF-modified effects. Based on the current literature, future studies on co-carcinogenicity of ELF MFs should employ approaches other than classical initiation-promotion models. Additionally, well-designed studies to better understand the reported effects of ELF MFs and the underlying mechanisms are warmly welcomed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"121819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与电力的使用和传输有关的极低频(ELF)磁场(MFs)可能的致癌性,几十年来一直在科学界和公众中争论不休。本综述旨在提供在实验动物中检测ELF mf致癌性的最新研究进展。重点是确定研究特征与所得结果之间可能存在的联系。本综述遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)声明,并使用国家毒理学计划健康评估和转化办公室(OHAT)开发的人类和动物研究偏倚风险评级工具对研究的方法学质量进行评估。采用卡钳检验评估发表偏倚。确定了54项符合条件的研究。尽管在偏倚风险评估的某些方面评分较低,但研究的质量总体上相对较好,只有4项研究获得最低评分。总的来说,很少有证据表明ELF MFs本身是致癌的。从ELF MFs与其他药物联合使用的研究中得出的共同致癌性证据仍不确定。观察到发表偏倚的明确迹象,尽管不太可能仅凭这一偏倚来解释所有报道的mf修饰效应。根据目前的文献,未来对极低频电磁场的共致癌性研究应采用经典的起始-促进模型以外的方法。此外,设计良好的研究,以更好地了解报道的极低频电磁场的影响和潜在机制,受到热烈欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carcinogenicity of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields: A systematic review of animal studies.

Possible carcinogenicity of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (MFs), associated with the use and transmission of electricity, has been under scientific and public debate for decades. This review aims to provide an update on studies testing carcinogenicity of ELF MFs in experimental animals. Emphasis was placed on identifying possible connections between study characteristics and the results obtained. This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, and the methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies developed by the National Toxicology Program's Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). Publication bias was assessed using the caliper test. Fifty-four eligible studies were identified. Despite poor ratings in certain aspects of the risk of bias evaluation, the quality of the studies was generally relatively good, with only four studies receiving the weakest rating. Overall, there was very little evidence that ELF MFs alone are carcinogenic. Evidence of co-carcinogenicity, from studies that have used ELF MFs in combination with other agents, remains inconclusive. A clear indication of publication bias was observed, though it is unlikely that this bias alone explains all reported MF-modified effects. Based on the current literature, future studies on co-carcinogenicity of ELF MFs should employ approaches other than classical initiation-promotion models. Additionally, well-designed studies to better understand the reported effects of ELF MFs and the underlying mechanisms are warmly welcomed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research
Environmental Research 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
8.40%
发文量
2480
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信