幼苗在空隙和封闭的树冠中的生长时间揭示了新英格兰森林中几十年的林下植被的持久性

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-05-16 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70273
Isabella Stone, Jeffrey Mintz, Claudia J. Garnica-Díaz, Chia-Hao Chang-Yang, David A. Orwig, Audrey A. Barker Plotkin, April Zee, Raelene M. Crandall, Daniel J. Johnson, Lukas J. Magee
{"title":"幼苗在空隙和封闭的树冠中的生长时间揭示了新英格兰森林中几十年的林下植被的持久性","authors":"Isabella Stone,&nbsp;Jeffrey Mintz,&nbsp;Claudia J. Garnica-Díaz,&nbsp;Chia-Hao Chang-Yang,&nbsp;David A. Orwig,&nbsp;Audrey A. Barker Plotkin,&nbsp;April Zee,&nbsp;Raelene M. Crandall,&nbsp;Daniel J. Johnson,&nbsp;Lukas J. Magee","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The duration of tree seedling persistence in the understory varies greatly between forests and across environmental conditions within a forest ecosystem. To examine species-level variation in understory persistence and passage to the sapling life stage, we followed 5236 seedlings in single-tree canopy gaps and closed canopy conditions over three years and simulated seedling passage times and the number of seedlings required to produce one 1.5-m tall sapling of five common tree species in a hemlock–hardwood forest of Massachusetts, USA. Averaged across species, it took 26 years in gaps and 31 years under closed canopies to go from a first-year seedling to a 1.5-m sapling. Across species, the average number of seedlings needed for one sapling was 294 in gaps and 2674 in closed canopy environments. We observed high interspecific variation in passage times and number required for one sapling. <i>Betula</i> congeners and <i>Pinus strobus</i> took less time and significantly fewer individuals than <i>Acer rubrum</i> and <i>Tsuga canadensis</i>, which are generally regarded as more tolerant of understory conditions. The largest intraspecific difference in gaps versus closed canopy environments was for <i>Quercus rubra</i>, where we estimated the number of seedlings required to produce one sapling in closed canopies to be 172 times higher than in gaps. Stem breakage also increased the number of seedlings needed per sapling, especially in closed canopy environments. We evaluated our estimates in the lab by aging cross-sections obtained from seedlings in gap and closed canopy conditions. Compared to our empirical age-to-height relationships, most simulations tended to underpredict seedling age for a given height, suggesting that passage times may be even longer than our simulations indicated. Our study shows that trees can persist for decades in the seedling life stage, highlighting a need for better-parameterized recruitment processes in demographic forecasting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seedling passage times in gaps and closed canopies reveal decades of understory persistence in a New England forest\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Stone,&nbsp;Jeffrey Mintz,&nbsp;Claudia J. Garnica-Díaz,&nbsp;Chia-Hao Chang-Yang,&nbsp;David A. Orwig,&nbsp;Audrey A. Barker Plotkin,&nbsp;April Zee,&nbsp;Raelene M. Crandall,&nbsp;Daniel J. Johnson,&nbsp;Lukas J. Magee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The duration of tree seedling persistence in the understory varies greatly between forests and across environmental conditions within a forest ecosystem. To examine species-level variation in understory persistence and passage to the sapling life stage, we followed 5236 seedlings in single-tree canopy gaps and closed canopy conditions over three years and simulated seedling passage times and the number of seedlings required to produce one 1.5-m tall sapling of five common tree species in a hemlock–hardwood forest of Massachusetts, USA. Averaged across species, it took 26 years in gaps and 31 years under closed canopies to go from a first-year seedling to a 1.5-m sapling. Across species, the average number of seedlings needed for one sapling was 294 in gaps and 2674 in closed canopy environments. We observed high interspecific variation in passage times and number required for one sapling. <i>Betula</i> congeners and <i>Pinus strobus</i> took less time and significantly fewer individuals than <i>Acer rubrum</i> and <i>Tsuga canadensis</i>, which are generally regarded as more tolerant of understory conditions. The largest intraspecific difference in gaps versus closed canopy environments was for <i>Quercus rubra</i>, where we estimated the number of seedlings required to produce one sapling in closed canopies to be 172 times higher than in gaps. Stem breakage also increased the number of seedlings needed per sapling, especially in closed canopy environments. We evaluated our estimates in the lab by aging cross-sections obtained from seedlings in gap and closed canopy conditions. Compared to our empirical age-to-height relationships, most simulations tended to underpredict seedling age for a given height, suggesting that passage times may be even longer than our simulations indicated. Our study shows that trees can persist for decades in the seedling life stage, highlighting a need for better-parameterized recruitment processes in demographic forecasting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70273\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70273\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

树苗在林下的持续时间在不同的森林和森林生态系统内的不同环境条件下差异很大。为了研究林下植物存续和幼苗过渡的物种水平变化,我们在美国马萨诸塞州的铁杉硬木森林中对5236棵幼苗进行了为期3年的跟踪研究,并模拟了5种常见树种的幼苗过渡时间和产生1.5 m高幼树所需的幼苗数量。从第一年的幼苗到1.5米高的树苗,在不同物种间平均需要26年,在封闭的树冠下需要31年。不同树种间,林隙条件下每棵树苗平均需要294棵树苗,封闭林冠环境下每棵树苗平均需要2674棵树苗。我们观察到在传代时间和每棵树苗所需的株数上有很大的种间差异。桦树同系物和油松比红槭和加拿大杉木需要更少的时间和更少的个体,而红槭和加拿大杉木通常被认为对林下条件更耐受。林隙与封闭林冠环境的种内差异最大的是栎树,我们估计在封闭林冠环境中产生一棵树苗所需的树苗数量是林隙环境的172倍。茎断也增加了每棵树苗所需的幼苗数量,特别是在封闭的冠层环境中。我们在实验室中通过在间隙和封闭冠层条件下获得的幼苗老化截面来评估我们的估计。与我们的经验年龄-高度关系相比,大多数模拟倾向于低估给定高度下的幼苗年龄,这表明通过时间可能比我们的模拟显示的更长。我们的研究表明,树木在幼苗阶段可以持续数十年,这突出了在人口预测中需要更好的参数化招募过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Seedling passage times in gaps and closed canopies reveal decades of understory persistence in a New England forest

Seedling passage times in gaps and closed canopies reveal decades of understory persistence in a New England forest

The duration of tree seedling persistence in the understory varies greatly between forests and across environmental conditions within a forest ecosystem. To examine species-level variation in understory persistence and passage to the sapling life stage, we followed 5236 seedlings in single-tree canopy gaps and closed canopy conditions over three years and simulated seedling passage times and the number of seedlings required to produce one 1.5-m tall sapling of five common tree species in a hemlock–hardwood forest of Massachusetts, USA. Averaged across species, it took 26 years in gaps and 31 years under closed canopies to go from a first-year seedling to a 1.5-m sapling. Across species, the average number of seedlings needed for one sapling was 294 in gaps and 2674 in closed canopy environments. We observed high interspecific variation in passage times and number required for one sapling. Betula congeners and Pinus strobus took less time and significantly fewer individuals than Acer rubrum and Tsuga canadensis, which are generally regarded as more tolerant of understory conditions. The largest intraspecific difference in gaps versus closed canopy environments was for Quercus rubra, where we estimated the number of seedlings required to produce one sapling in closed canopies to be 172 times higher than in gaps. Stem breakage also increased the number of seedlings needed per sapling, especially in closed canopy environments. We evaluated our estimates in the lab by aging cross-sections obtained from seedlings in gap and closed canopy conditions. Compared to our empirical age-to-height relationships, most simulations tended to underpredict seedling age for a given height, suggesting that passage times may be even longer than our simulations indicated. Our study shows that trees can persist for decades in the seedling life stage, highlighting a need for better-parameterized recruitment processes in demographic forecasting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信