天然气联合发电厂的能源、火用和热经济分析

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Bashar Mohammed Al-Dulaimi, Mutlucan Bayat, Mutlu Tekir
{"title":"天然气联合发电厂的能源、火用和热经济分析","authors":"Bashar Mohammed Al-Dulaimi,&nbsp;Mutlucan Bayat,&nbsp;Mutlu Tekir","doi":"10.1007/s10973-024-13897-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores an innovative power plant design integrating three organic Rankine cycle (ORC) subsystems with a Brayton cycle (BC) to enhance energy conversion efficiency by utilising various waste heat sources. The study applies advanced energy, exergy, and thermoeconomic analyses to comprehensively assess the performance of a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant, using the energy equation solver (EES) software. The model has been validated against previous research with different parameters, such as compressor efficiency, ambient temperature, and pressure ratio, confirming its accuracy and reliability. The numerical results demonstrate that increasing compressor efficiency from 70 to 88% boosts the NGCC system’s net power output by nearly 60% compared to the Brayton cycle alone. Additionally, both energy and exergy efficiencies of the NGCC improve by 6.6% from the initial state, while the annual cost rate shows a parabolic increase over this range. Furthermore, higher turbine efficiency leads to a 14% increase in overall energy efficiency and a 13% increase in exergy efficiency. An increase in pressure ratio from 6 to 15 raises energy and exergy efficiency by 4% and 3%, respectively. However, the influence of the pressure ratio is less significant compared to the other parameters. Moreover, cycle performance is inversely related to ambient and exhaust gas temperatures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":"150 3","pages":"1869 - 1885"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy, exergy, and thermoeconomic analysis of a natural gas combined power plant\",\"authors\":\"Bashar Mohammed Al-Dulaimi,&nbsp;Mutlucan Bayat,&nbsp;Mutlu Tekir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10973-024-13897-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper explores an innovative power plant design integrating three organic Rankine cycle (ORC) subsystems with a Brayton cycle (BC) to enhance energy conversion efficiency by utilising various waste heat sources. The study applies advanced energy, exergy, and thermoeconomic analyses to comprehensively assess the performance of a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant, using the energy equation solver (EES) software. The model has been validated against previous research with different parameters, such as compressor efficiency, ambient temperature, and pressure ratio, confirming its accuracy and reliability. The numerical results demonstrate that increasing compressor efficiency from 70 to 88% boosts the NGCC system’s net power output by nearly 60% compared to the Brayton cycle alone. Additionally, both energy and exergy efficiencies of the NGCC improve by 6.6% from the initial state, while the annual cost rate shows a parabolic increase over this range. Furthermore, higher turbine efficiency leads to a 14% increase in overall energy efficiency and a 13% increase in exergy efficiency. An increase in pressure ratio from 6 to 15 raises energy and exergy efficiency by 4% and 3%, respectively. However, the influence of the pressure ratio is less significant compared to the other parameters. Moreover, cycle performance is inversely related to ambient and exhaust gas temperatures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"volume\":\"150 3\",\"pages\":\"1869 - 1885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13897-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13897-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了一种将三个有机朗肯循环(ORC)子系统与布雷顿循环(BC)集成在一起的创新电厂设计,通过利用各种废热源来提高能量转换效率。该研究应用先进的能源、火用和热经济分析,利用能量方程求解器(EES)软件对天然气联合循环(NGCC)电厂的性能进行综合评估。利用压缩机效率、环境温度、压力比等参数对模型进行了验证,验证了模型的准确性和可靠性。数值结果表明,与Brayton循环相比,将压缩机效率从70%提高到88%可使NGCC系统的净功率输出提高近60%。此外,NGCC的能源效率和火用效率都比初始状态提高了6.6%,而年成本率在此范围内呈抛物线增长。此外,更高的涡轮效率导致整体能源效率增加14%,火用效率增加13%。压力比从6增加到15,能量和火用效率分别提高4%和3%。但与其他参数相比,压力比的影响较小。此外,循环性能与环境温度和废气温度成反比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy, exergy, and thermoeconomic analysis of a natural gas combined power plant

This paper explores an innovative power plant design integrating three organic Rankine cycle (ORC) subsystems with a Brayton cycle (BC) to enhance energy conversion efficiency by utilising various waste heat sources. The study applies advanced energy, exergy, and thermoeconomic analyses to comprehensively assess the performance of a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant, using the energy equation solver (EES) software. The model has been validated against previous research with different parameters, such as compressor efficiency, ambient temperature, and pressure ratio, confirming its accuracy and reliability. The numerical results demonstrate that increasing compressor efficiency from 70 to 88% boosts the NGCC system’s net power output by nearly 60% compared to the Brayton cycle alone. Additionally, both energy and exergy efficiencies of the NGCC improve by 6.6% from the initial state, while the annual cost rate shows a parabolic increase over this range. Furthermore, higher turbine efficiency leads to a 14% increase in overall energy efficiency and a 13% increase in exergy efficiency. An increase in pressure ratio from 6 to 15 raises energy and exergy efficiency by 4% and 3%, respectively. However, the influence of the pressure ratio is less significant compared to the other parameters. Moreover, cycle performance is inversely related to ambient and exhaust gas temperatures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews. The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信