皮肤:在皮肤病学中导航困难对话的四步方法

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Emily R. Gordon, Megan H. Trager, Cindy Nelson, Rosie Balk, Jeff Miller, Brigit A. Lapolla, Oluwaseyi Adeuyan, Celine M. Schreidah, Faramarz H. Samie, Cori Salvit, Douglas J. Koo, Larisa J. Geskin
{"title":"皮肤:在皮肤病学中导航困难对话的四步方法","authors":"Emily R. Gordon,&nbsp;Megan H. Trager,&nbsp;Cindy Nelson,&nbsp;Rosie Balk,&nbsp;Jeff Miller,&nbsp;Brigit A. Lapolla,&nbsp;Oluwaseyi Adeuyan,&nbsp;Celine M. Schreidah,&nbsp;Faramarz H. Samie,&nbsp;Cori Salvit,&nbsp;Douglas J. Koo,&nbsp;Larisa J. Geskin","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04257-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diagnostic disclosure in the world of new technologies presents unique challenges. Studies investigating the role of dermatologists in breaking bad news and standard practices do not exist. To evaluate dermatologists’ perceptions, frequency, and attitudes towards breaking bad news and to create a practical guide for diagnostic disclosure. A national survey of 223 dermatologists (via the American Academy of Dermatology) assessed their comfort and training in breaking bad news. The responses were analyzed for patterns and gaps in preparedness. All dermatologists felt breaking bad news was an important daily task. However, many (40%) did not feel completely comfortable with diagnostic disclosure and often learned during practice (61%) or lacked any training in the task (17%). Dermatologists highlighted the need for additional resources; thus we created a guide for breaking bad news in dermatology which we called the SKIN (Set the stage, Knowledge, Inform, Next steps) approach. The SKIN approach offers a structured framework to improve dermatologists’ confidence and effectiveness in diagnostic disclosure. Incorporating formal training into medical education and residency programs could further enhance preparedness for this task.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SKIN: a four step method for navigating difficult conversations in dermatology\",\"authors\":\"Emily R. Gordon,&nbsp;Megan H. Trager,&nbsp;Cindy Nelson,&nbsp;Rosie Balk,&nbsp;Jeff Miller,&nbsp;Brigit A. Lapolla,&nbsp;Oluwaseyi Adeuyan,&nbsp;Celine M. Schreidah,&nbsp;Faramarz H. Samie,&nbsp;Cori Salvit,&nbsp;Douglas J. Koo,&nbsp;Larisa J. Geskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04257-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Diagnostic disclosure in the world of new technologies presents unique challenges. Studies investigating the role of dermatologists in breaking bad news and standard practices do not exist. To evaluate dermatologists’ perceptions, frequency, and attitudes towards breaking bad news and to create a practical guide for diagnostic disclosure. A national survey of 223 dermatologists (via the American Academy of Dermatology) assessed their comfort and training in breaking bad news. The responses were analyzed for patterns and gaps in preparedness. All dermatologists felt breaking bad news was an important daily task. However, many (40%) did not feel completely comfortable with diagnostic disclosure and often learned during practice (61%) or lacked any training in the task (17%). Dermatologists highlighted the need for additional resources; thus we created a guide for breaking bad news in dermatology which we called the SKIN (Set the stage, Knowledge, Inform, Next steps) approach. The SKIN approach offers a structured framework to improve dermatologists’ confidence and effectiveness in diagnostic disclosure. Incorporating formal training into medical education and residency programs could further enhance preparedness for this task.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04257-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04257-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新技术的世界里,诊断信息披露提出了独特的挑战。调查皮肤科医生在突发坏消息和标准做法中的作用的研究并不存在。评估皮肤科医生对突发坏消息的看法、频率和态度,并为诊断披露创建实用指南。一项对223名皮肤科医生(通过美国皮肤科学会)的全国性调查评估了他们在公布坏消息方面的舒适度和训练情况。分析了响应的模式和准备方面的差距。所有皮肤科医生都觉得公布坏消息是一项重要的日常任务。然而,许多人(40%)对诊断披露并不完全放心,并且经常在实践中学习(61%)或缺乏任何培训(17%)。皮肤科医生强调需要额外的资源;因此,我们创建了一个关于皮肤病学坏消息的指南,我们称之为SKIN(设置阶段,知识,通知,下一步)方法。SKIN方法提供了一个结构化的框架,以提高皮肤科医生的信心和诊断披露的有效性。将正式培训纳入医学教育和住院医师计划可以进一步加强对这一任务的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SKIN: a four step method for navigating difficult conversations in dermatology

Diagnostic disclosure in the world of new technologies presents unique challenges. Studies investigating the role of dermatologists in breaking bad news and standard practices do not exist. To evaluate dermatologists’ perceptions, frequency, and attitudes towards breaking bad news and to create a practical guide for diagnostic disclosure. A national survey of 223 dermatologists (via the American Academy of Dermatology) assessed their comfort and training in breaking bad news. The responses were analyzed for patterns and gaps in preparedness. All dermatologists felt breaking bad news was an important daily task. However, many (40%) did not feel completely comfortable with diagnostic disclosure and often learned during practice (61%) or lacked any training in the task (17%). Dermatologists highlighted the need for additional resources; thus we created a guide for breaking bad news in dermatology which we called the SKIN (Set the stage, Knowledge, Inform, Next steps) approach. The SKIN approach offers a structured framework to improve dermatologists’ confidence and effectiveness in diagnostic disclosure. Incorporating formal training into medical education and residency programs could further enhance preparedness for this task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信