加拿大多伦多餐馆网上菜单上的食物过敏标签和披露做法

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Rawan Nahle, Abhinand Thaivalappil, Ian Young
{"title":"加拿大多伦多餐馆网上菜单上的食物过敏标签和披露做法","authors":"Rawan Nahle,&nbsp;Abhinand Thaivalappil,&nbsp;Ian Young","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restaurants have a responsibility to mitigate food-allergic reactions by nonverbally disclosing allergens on their menus and websites. In Canada, there are no laws requiring allergen labeling on non–pre-packaged food, leaving it up to restaurant managers to decide how to accommodate allergic customers. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess allergen disclosure and labeling on online menus in Toronto, Canada. A random sample of 1,000 nonchain restaurants was sourced from DineSafe, Toronto’s food inspection system. The online menus of each restaurant were accessed and assessed using a checklist in 2023–2024 to determine the presence of allergen menus, statements, or symbols. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were developed to assess the relationship between restaurant characteristics (cuisine type, Google review rating, cost indicator, and number of locations) and two outcomes: (1) presence of at least one allergen symbol on the menu, and (2) presence of an allergen statement on the menu. Only 16% (<em>n</em> = 159) of restaurants included allergen statements, and only 10% (<em>n</em> = 100) used allergen symbols. Regression models predicted that vegan and vegetarian restaurants were the most likely cuisine type to have at least one allergen symbol on their menu (19%, 95% CI: 13–24%), and Southeast Asian restaurants were the most likely to have an allergen statement (28%, 95% CI: 20–36%). Additionally, higher restaurant costs and multiple locations were linked to more allergen disclosures. This study highlights the need for improved allergen labeling in nonchain restaurants. Policies requiring allergen disclosures can improve menu transparency and encourage proactive customer-waiter interactions, preventing allergic reactions in restaurants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 7","pages":"Article 100533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Allergy Labeling and Disclosure Practices on Restaurants’ Online Menus in Toronto, Canada\",\"authors\":\"Rawan Nahle,&nbsp;Abhinand Thaivalappil,&nbsp;Ian Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Restaurants have a responsibility to mitigate food-allergic reactions by nonverbally disclosing allergens on their menus and websites. In Canada, there are no laws requiring allergen labeling on non–pre-packaged food, leaving it up to restaurant managers to decide how to accommodate allergic customers. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess allergen disclosure and labeling on online menus in Toronto, Canada. A random sample of 1,000 nonchain restaurants was sourced from DineSafe, Toronto’s food inspection system. The online menus of each restaurant were accessed and assessed using a checklist in 2023–2024 to determine the presence of allergen menus, statements, or symbols. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were developed to assess the relationship between restaurant characteristics (cuisine type, Google review rating, cost indicator, and number of locations) and two outcomes: (1) presence of at least one allergen symbol on the menu, and (2) presence of an allergen statement on the menu. Only 16% (<em>n</em> = 159) of restaurants included allergen statements, and only 10% (<em>n</em> = 100) used allergen symbols. Regression models predicted that vegan and vegetarian restaurants were the most likely cuisine type to have at least one allergen symbol on their menu (19%, 95% CI: 13–24%), and Southeast Asian restaurants were the most likely to have an allergen statement (28%, 95% CI: 20–36%). Additionally, higher restaurant costs and multiple locations were linked to more allergen disclosures. This study highlights the need for improved allergen labeling in nonchain restaurants. Policies requiring allergen disclosures can improve menu transparency and encourage proactive customer-waiter interactions, preventing allergic reactions in restaurants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 100533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000857\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

餐馆有责任通过在菜单和网站上以非语言方式标明过敏原来减轻食物过敏反应。在加拿大,没有法律要求在非预包装食品上标注过敏原,让餐馆经理决定如何接待过敏的顾客。在加拿大多伦多进行了一项横断面研究,以评估在线菜单上的过敏原披露和标签。多伦多食品检测系统DineSafe随机抽查了1000家非连锁餐厅。在2023-2024年期间,每个餐厅的在线菜单都被访问并使用清单进行评估,以确定过敏原菜单、声明或符号的存在。开发了混合效应逻辑回归模型来评估餐厅特征(菜肴类型,谷歌评论评级,成本指标和地点数量)与两个结果之间的关系:(1)菜单上至少存在一个过敏原符号,(2)菜单上存在过敏原声明。只有16% (n = 159)的餐馆包含过敏原说明,只有10% (n = 100)的餐馆使用过敏原符号。回归模型预测,纯素和素食餐厅是最有可能在菜单上至少有一个过敏原符号的菜肴类型(19%,95% CI: 13-24%),东南亚餐厅最有可能有过敏原声明(28%,95% CI: 20-36%)。此外,更高的餐厅成本和多个地点与更多的过敏原披露有关。这项研究强调了改善非连锁餐馆过敏原标签的必要性。要求公开过敏原的政策可以提高菜单的透明度,鼓励顾客与服务员主动互动,防止餐馆发生过敏反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food Allergy Labeling and Disclosure Practices on Restaurants’ Online Menus in Toronto, Canada
Restaurants have a responsibility to mitigate food-allergic reactions by nonverbally disclosing allergens on their menus and websites. In Canada, there are no laws requiring allergen labeling on non–pre-packaged food, leaving it up to restaurant managers to decide how to accommodate allergic customers. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess allergen disclosure and labeling on online menus in Toronto, Canada. A random sample of 1,000 nonchain restaurants was sourced from DineSafe, Toronto’s food inspection system. The online menus of each restaurant were accessed and assessed using a checklist in 2023–2024 to determine the presence of allergen menus, statements, or symbols. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were developed to assess the relationship between restaurant characteristics (cuisine type, Google review rating, cost indicator, and number of locations) and two outcomes: (1) presence of at least one allergen symbol on the menu, and (2) presence of an allergen statement on the menu. Only 16% (n = 159) of restaurants included allergen statements, and only 10% (n = 100) used allergen symbols. Regression models predicted that vegan and vegetarian restaurants were the most likely cuisine type to have at least one allergen symbol on their menu (19%, 95% CI: 13–24%), and Southeast Asian restaurants were the most likely to have an allergen statement (28%, 95% CI: 20–36%). Additionally, higher restaurant costs and multiple locations were linked to more allergen disclosures. This study highlights the need for improved allergen labeling in nonchain restaurants. Policies requiring allergen disclosures can improve menu transparency and encourage proactive customer-waiter interactions, preventing allergic reactions in restaurants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信