Y. Allouche , S. Marchetti , R. Bengalli , G. Motta , L. Pagliarulo , F. Cazier , S. Achard , M. Fadel , P. Mantecca , D. Courcot , F. Ledoux , A. Verdin , M. Gualtieri
{"title":"浸泡和空气液界面暴露的比较:支气管上皮细胞毒性效应评估的局限性和差异","authors":"Y. Allouche , S. Marchetti , R. Bengalli , G. Motta , L. Pagliarulo , F. Cazier , S. Achard , M. Fadel , P. Mantecca , D. Courcot , F. Ledoux , A. Verdin , M. Gualtieri","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2025.121856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airborne particulate matter (PM) is the primary environmental cause of death worldwide. The understanding of the toxicological mechanism has improved over the last decades, nonetheless now novel exposure systems allow the possibility to mimic the <em>in vivo</em> interaction between particles or particle constituents and lung cells. Here we report the results obtained after exposure to the organic extract of fine PM (PM<sub>2.5-0.3</sub>) of the BEAS-2B cells cultured in submerged or at the air liquid interface (ALI) conditions. Deposition efficiency of both PM and its organic extract was followed. Cell viability, inflammatory responses and gene expression were then evaluated. The comparison of submerged vs ALI exposure revealed significant differences in the expression of specific genes such as <em>CYP1A1</em> and <em>NQO1</em> 6h after exposure and <em>CYP1B1</em> and <em>NFkB1</em> 24h post exposure. Also, the results demonstrate the importance of evaluating the efficiency of deposition of the treatment to avoid misinterpretation of the results. PM particles determined an extremely low deposition efficiency, making it impossible to use this particle for ALI exposure tests. Although biological results, such as gene expression, may vary between the two exposure approaches (submerged or ALI), the ALI exposure should be preferred as it is more representative of human exposure via the respiratory route.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 121856"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of submerged and air liquid interface exposure: limitations and differences in the toxicological effects evaluated in bronchial epithelial cells\",\"authors\":\"Y. Allouche , S. Marchetti , R. Bengalli , G. Motta , L. Pagliarulo , F. Cazier , S. Achard , M. Fadel , P. Mantecca , D. Courcot , F. Ledoux , A. Verdin , M. Gualtieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envres.2025.121856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Airborne particulate matter (PM) is the primary environmental cause of death worldwide. The understanding of the toxicological mechanism has improved over the last decades, nonetheless now novel exposure systems allow the possibility to mimic the <em>in vivo</em> interaction between particles or particle constituents and lung cells. Here we report the results obtained after exposure to the organic extract of fine PM (PM<sub>2.5-0.3</sub>) of the BEAS-2B cells cultured in submerged or at the air liquid interface (ALI) conditions. Deposition efficiency of both PM and its organic extract was followed. Cell viability, inflammatory responses and gene expression were then evaluated. The comparison of submerged vs ALI exposure revealed significant differences in the expression of specific genes such as <em>CYP1A1</em> and <em>NQO1</em> 6h after exposure and <em>CYP1B1</em> and <em>NFkB1</em> 24h post exposure. Also, the results demonstrate the importance of evaluating the efficiency of deposition of the treatment to avoid misinterpretation of the results. PM particles determined an extremely low deposition efficiency, making it impossible to use this particle for ALI exposure tests. Although biological results, such as gene expression, may vary between the two exposure approaches (submerged or ALI), the ALI exposure should be preferred as it is more representative of human exposure via the respiratory route.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935125011077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935125011077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of submerged and air liquid interface exposure: limitations and differences in the toxicological effects evaluated in bronchial epithelial cells
Airborne particulate matter (PM) is the primary environmental cause of death worldwide. The understanding of the toxicological mechanism has improved over the last decades, nonetheless now novel exposure systems allow the possibility to mimic the in vivo interaction between particles or particle constituents and lung cells. Here we report the results obtained after exposure to the organic extract of fine PM (PM2.5-0.3) of the BEAS-2B cells cultured in submerged or at the air liquid interface (ALI) conditions. Deposition efficiency of both PM and its organic extract was followed. Cell viability, inflammatory responses and gene expression were then evaluated. The comparison of submerged vs ALI exposure revealed significant differences in the expression of specific genes such as CYP1A1 and NQO1 6h after exposure and CYP1B1 and NFkB1 24h post exposure. Also, the results demonstrate the importance of evaluating the efficiency of deposition of the treatment to avoid misinterpretation of the results. PM particles determined an extremely low deposition efficiency, making it impossible to use this particle for ALI exposure tests. Although biological results, such as gene expression, may vary between the two exposure approaches (submerged or ALI), the ALI exposure should be preferred as it is more representative of human exposure via the respiratory route.
期刊介绍:
The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.