消失的水体和被淹没的城市——金奈极端洪水的反事实情景突出了基于自然的解决方案的潜力

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
N. Nithila Devi , Abinesh Ganapathy , André Felipe Rocha Silva , Sergiy Vorogushyn , Heiko Apel , Heidi Kreibich , Laurens Jozef Nicolaas Oostwegel , Soumendra Nath Kuiry , Nivedita Sairam
{"title":"消失的水体和被淹没的城市——金奈极端洪水的反事实情景突出了基于自然的解决方案的潜力","authors":"N. Nithila Devi ,&nbsp;Abinesh Ganapathy ,&nbsp;André Felipe Rocha Silva ,&nbsp;Sergiy Vorogushyn ,&nbsp;Heiko Apel ,&nbsp;Heidi Kreibich ,&nbsp;Laurens Jozef Nicolaas Oostwegel ,&nbsp;Soumendra Nath Kuiry ,&nbsp;Nivedita Sairam","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In rapidly growing cities, unregulated urban expansion may encroach water bodies and floodplains, leading to frequent flooding. Chennai's traditional water bodies, known as ‘<em>tanks</em>’, act as nature-based solutions (NbS) for flood mitigation. Since the early 1900s, urbanization has led to the loss of 13.6 million m<sup>3</sup> of tank storage within the city. The remaining tanks, holding 174.7 million m<sup>3</sup> of water outside the city, are now at risk. We construct two counterfactual scenarios – what if (1) the lost tanks from the early 1900s had been protected during the urbanization (<em>with tanks</em>), and (2) the existing tanks upstream of the city were also lost (<em>u/s no tanks</em> - <em>u/s</em> denotes upstream). These scenarios are analyzed against the current situation (<em>baseline</em>), using the extreme 2015 flooding. The analysis reveals that in <em>u/s no tanks</em>, the potential flood damages rose by 44 % compared to the <em>baseline</em>. Conversely, flood damages decreased by 17 % in the <em>with tanks</em>. The population at risk increases by 40.5 % in <em>u/s no tanks</em>, while it decreases by 25.3 % in <em>with tanks</em> compared to the <em>baseline</em>. Thus, this study highlights the multi-dimensional impact of water bodies in flood control by examining the case of a rapidly expanding city.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 102454"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lost water bodies and a flooded city – Counterfactual scenarios of the extreme Chennai flood highlight the potential of nature-based solutions\",\"authors\":\"N. Nithila Devi ,&nbsp;Abinesh Ganapathy ,&nbsp;André Felipe Rocha Silva ,&nbsp;Sergiy Vorogushyn ,&nbsp;Heiko Apel ,&nbsp;Heidi Kreibich ,&nbsp;Laurens Jozef Nicolaas Oostwegel ,&nbsp;Soumendra Nath Kuiry ,&nbsp;Nivedita Sairam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In rapidly growing cities, unregulated urban expansion may encroach water bodies and floodplains, leading to frequent flooding. Chennai's traditional water bodies, known as ‘<em>tanks</em>’, act as nature-based solutions (NbS) for flood mitigation. Since the early 1900s, urbanization has led to the loss of 13.6 million m<sup>3</sup> of tank storage within the city. The remaining tanks, holding 174.7 million m<sup>3</sup> of water outside the city, are now at risk. We construct two counterfactual scenarios – what if (1) the lost tanks from the early 1900s had been protected during the urbanization (<em>with tanks</em>), and (2) the existing tanks upstream of the city were also lost (<em>u/s no tanks</em> - <em>u/s</em> denotes upstream). These scenarios are analyzed against the current situation (<em>baseline</em>), using the extreme 2015 flooding. The analysis reveals that in <em>u/s no tanks</em>, the potential flood damages rose by 44 % compared to the <em>baseline</em>. Conversely, flood damages decreased by 17 % in the <em>with tanks</em>. The population at risk increases by 40.5 % in <em>u/s no tanks</em>, while it decreases by 25.3 % in <em>with tanks</em> compared to the <em>baseline</em>. Thus, this study highlights the multi-dimensional impact of water bodies in flood control by examining the case of a rapidly expanding city.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Climate\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Climate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095525001701\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095525001701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在快速发展的城市中,不受管制的城市扩张可能会侵占水体和洪泛平原,导致洪水频发。金奈的传统水体,被称为“水箱”,作为基于自然的解决方案(NbS)来缓解洪水。自20世纪初以来,城市化已经导致该市损失了1360万立方米的储罐。在城市外储存着1.747亿立方米水的剩余水箱现在处于危险之中。我们构建了两个反事实情景——如果(1)20世纪初丢失的储罐在城市化过程中得到了保护(有储罐),以及(2)城市上游现有的储罐也丢失了(u/s没有储罐——u/s表示上游)。根据2015年极端洪水的现状(基线)对这些情景进行了分析。分析表明,在没有储罐的情况下,潜在的洪水损失比基线增加了44%。相反,在有水箱的情况下,洪水损失减少了17%。与基线相比,无水箱组的危险人群增加了40.5%,而有水箱组的危险人群减少了25.3%。因此,本研究以一个快速扩张的城市为例,突出了水体在防洪中的多维影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lost water bodies and a flooded city – Counterfactual scenarios of the extreme Chennai flood highlight the potential of nature-based solutions
In rapidly growing cities, unregulated urban expansion may encroach water bodies and floodplains, leading to frequent flooding. Chennai's traditional water bodies, known as ‘tanks’, act as nature-based solutions (NbS) for flood mitigation. Since the early 1900s, urbanization has led to the loss of 13.6 million m3 of tank storage within the city. The remaining tanks, holding 174.7 million m3 of water outside the city, are now at risk. We construct two counterfactual scenarios – what if (1) the lost tanks from the early 1900s had been protected during the urbanization (with tanks), and (2) the existing tanks upstream of the city were also lost (u/s no tanks - u/s denotes upstream). These scenarios are analyzed against the current situation (baseline), using the extreme 2015 flooding. The analysis reveals that in u/s no tanks, the potential flood damages rose by 44 % compared to the baseline. Conversely, flood damages decreased by 17 % in the with tanks. The population at risk increases by 40.5 % in u/s no tanks, while it decreases by 25.3 % in with tanks compared to the baseline. Thus, this study highlights the multi-dimensional impact of water bodies in flood control by examining the case of a rapidly expanding city.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Climate
Urban Climate Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following: Urban meteorology and climate[...] Urban environmental pollution[...] Adaptation to global change[...] Urban economic and social issues[...] Research Approaches[...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信