{"title":"过渡与否?评估南非能源转型中相互矛盾的叙述","authors":"Almut Mohr","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates how and why stakeholders in the just energy transition in South Africa, where coal is the main source of electricity and a major export product, support or oppose a transition. Based on novel primary data collected through interviews with the environmental and labour movements in South Africa, with a special focus in Mpumalanga Province, the paper assesses the different narratives that have emerged about the just energy transition. Using an inductive coding process, the empirical analysis reveals narratives around six key themes that justify or reject just energy transition efforts: (1) climate change; (2) environmental pollution; (3) affected communities and workers; (4) energy crisis; (5) international exports; (6) just transition planning and implementation. A cluster analysis reveals differences between the two movements and within the labour movement and shows that geographical proximity to coal infrastructure matters. The findings from South Africa can inform our understanding on the role of social movements in just energy transitions in the Global South more generally, and the extent to which narratives matter for the support or opposition of an energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104099"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition or not? Assessing competing narratives in South Africa's just energy transition\",\"authors\":\"Almut Mohr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates how and why stakeholders in the just energy transition in South Africa, where coal is the main source of electricity and a major export product, support or oppose a transition. Based on novel primary data collected through interviews with the environmental and labour movements in South Africa, with a special focus in Mpumalanga Province, the paper assesses the different narratives that have emerged about the just energy transition. Using an inductive coding process, the empirical analysis reveals narratives around six key themes that justify or reject just energy transition efforts: (1) climate change; (2) environmental pollution; (3) affected communities and workers; (4) energy crisis; (5) international exports; (6) just transition planning and implementation. A cluster analysis reveals differences between the two movements and within the labour movement and shows that geographical proximity to coal infrastructure matters. The findings from South Africa can inform our understanding on the role of social movements in just energy transitions in the Global South more generally, and the extent to which narratives matter for the support or opposition of an energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500180X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500180X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transition or not? Assessing competing narratives in South Africa's just energy transition
This paper investigates how and why stakeholders in the just energy transition in South Africa, where coal is the main source of electricity and a major export product, support or oppose a transition. Based on novel primary data collected through interviews with the environmental and labour movements in South Africa, with a special focus in Mpumalanga Province, the paper assesses the different narratives that have emerged about the just energy transition. Using an inductive coding process, the empirical analysis reveals narratives around six key themes that justify or reject just energy transition efforts: (1) climate change; (2) environmental pollution; (3) affected communities and workers; (4) energy crisis; (5) international exports; (6) just transition planning and implementation. A cluster analysis reveals differences between the two movements and within the labour movement and shows that geographical proximity to coal infrastructure matters. The findings from South Africa can inform our understanding on the role of social movements in just energy transitions in the Global South more generally, and the extent to which narratives matter for the support or opposition of an energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.