Hua Wang , Shannon Kiener , Shizhen Steven Wang , Kaiping Deng , Emily Smith , Kai-Shun Chen , Ruiqing Pamboukian , Anna Laasri , Catalina Pelaez , Jodie Ulaszek , Matthew Kmet , Antonio De Jesus , Guodong Zhang , Thomas Hammack , Ravinder Reddy
{"title":"冷冻鱼中沙门氏菌实时PCR检测方法的多实验室验证研究","authors":"Hua Wang , Shannon Kiener , Shizhen Steven Wang , Kaiping Deng , Emily Smith , Kai-Shun Chen , Ruiqing Pamboukian , Anna Laasri , Catalina Pelaez , Jodie Ulaszek , Matthew Kmet , Antonio De Jesus , Guodong Zhang , Thomas Hammack , Ravinder Reddy","doi":"10.1016/j.fm.2025.104813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A multi-laboratory validation (MLV) study was performed to validate a quantitative PCR (qPCR) method developed by the FDA for detecting <em>Salmonella</em> in frozen fish. Frozen fish represents foods that use blending sample preparation procedure in the BAM <em>Salmonella</em> method. This study was carried out after a successful MLV study with baby spinach which represents foods that use soaking sample preparation procedure. Fourteen laboratories participated in this study and they each analyzed twenty-four blind-coded frozen fish test portions using both the qPCR and BAM culture (reference) methods. Across collaborators, this study yielded a ∼39 % and a ∼40 % positive rate for the qPCR and culture methods, respectively, which were within the fractional range (25 %–75 %) that is required by the FDA's Microbiological Method Validation Guidelines. The difference (ND-PD) and sum (ND + PD) of the numbers of negative deviation (ND) and positive deviation (PD), which measure disagreement of results between the qPCR and culture methods, both did not exceed the Acceptability Limit required by ISO 16140–2:2016. The relative level of detection (RLOD), which compares the levels of detection between the two methods, was approximately 1. Together, these results demonstrate that the qPCR and BAM culture methods performed equally well for the detection of <em>Salmonella</em>. Furthermore, the study showed that the qPCR method yielded reproducible results among laboratories and was both sufficiently sensitive and specific for the detection of <em>Salmonella</em> in foods. Automatic DNA extraction improves qPCR sensitivity with a higher quality of DNA extract and provides a high throughput application for FDA laboratories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12399,"journal":{"name":"Food microbiology","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-laboratory validation study of a real-time PCR method for detection of Salmonella in frozen fish\",\"authors\":\"Hua Wang , Shannon Kiener , Shizhen Steven Wang , Kaiping Deng , Emily Smith , Kai-Shun Chen , Ruiqing Pamboukian , Anna Laasri , Catalina Pelaez , Jodie Ulaszek , Matthew Kmet , Antonio De Jesus , Guodong Zhang , Thomas Hammack , Ravinder Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fm.2025.104813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A multi-laboratory validation (MLV) study was performed to validate a quantitative PCR (qPCR) method developed by the FDA for detecting <em>Salmonella</em> in frozen fish. Frozen fish represents foods that use blending sample preparation procedure in the BAM <em>Salmonella</em> method. This study was carried out after a successful MLV study with baby spinach which represents foods that use soaking sample preparation procedure. Fourteen laboratories participated in this study and they each analyzed twenty-four blind-coded frozen fish test portions using both the qPCR and BAM culture (reference) methods. Across collaborators, this study yielded a ∼39 % and a ∼40 % positive rate for the qPCR and culture methods, respectively, which were within the fractional range (25 %–75 %) that is required by the FDA's Microbiological Method Validation Guidelines. The difference (ND-PD) and sum (ND + PD) of the numbers of negative deviation (ND) and positive deviation (PD), which measure disagreement of results between the qPCR and culture methods, both did not exceed the Acceptability Limit required by ISO 16140–2:2016. The relative level of detection (RLOD), which compares the levels of detection between the two methods, was approximately 1. Together, these results demonstrate that the qPCR and BAM culture methods performed equally well for the detection of <em>Salmonella</em>. Furthermore, the study showed that the qPCR method yielded reproducible results among laboratories and was both sufficiently sensitive and specific for the detection of <em>Salmonella</em> in foods. Automatic DNA extraction improves qPCR sensitivity with a higher quality of DNA extract and provides a high throughput application for FDA laboratories.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food microbiology\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002025000930\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002025000930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-laboratory validation study of a real-time PCR method for detection of Salmonella in frozen fish
A multi-laboratory validation (MLV) study was performed to validate a quantitative PCR (qPCR) method developed by the FDA for detecting Salmonella in frozen fish. Frozen fish represents foods that use blending sample preparation procedure in the BAM Salmonella method. This study was carried out after a successful MLV study with baby spinach which represents foods that use soaking sample preparation procedure. Fourteen laboratories participated in this study and they each analyzed twenty-four blind-coded frozen fish test portions using both the qPCR and BAM culture (reference) methods. Across collaborators, this study yielded a ∼39 % and a ∼40 % positive rate for the qPCR and culture methods, respectively, which were within the fractional range (25 %–75 %) that is required by the FDA's Microbiological Method Validation Guidelines. The difference (ND-PD) and sum (ND + PD) of the numbers of negative deviation (ND) and positive deviation (PD), which measure disagreement of results between the qPCR and culture methods, both did not exceed the Acceptability Limit required by ISO 16140–2:2016. The relative level of detection (RLOD), which compares the levels of detection between the two methods, was approximately 1. Together, these results demonstrate that the qPCR and BAM culture methods performed equally well for the detection of Salmonella. Furthermore, the study showed that the qPCR method yielded reproducible results among laboratories and was both sufficiently sensitive and specific for the detection of Salmonella in foods. Automatic DNA extraction improves qPCR sensitivity with a higher quality of DNA extract and provides a high throughput application for FDA laboratories.
期刊介绍:
Food Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, review papers, letters, news items and book reviews dealing with all aspects of the microbiology of foods. The editors aim to publish manuscripts of the highest quality which are both relevant and applicable to the broad field covered by the journal. Studies must be novel, have a clear connection to food microbiology, and be of general interest to the international community of food microbiologists. The editors make every effort to ensure rapid and fair reviews, resulting in timely publication of accepted manuscripts.