通过整合MCDM和集成机器学习模型,探索流域的形态构造性质、水文和物理特征,并优先考虑子流域地表径流潜力

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sribas Kanji, Subhasish Das
{"title":"通过整合MCDM和集成机器学习模型,探索流域的形态构造性质、水文和物理特征,并优先考虑子流域地表径流潜力","authors":"Sribas Kanji,&nbsp;Subhasish Das","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Much effective rainfall often leads to natural and human-induced hazards when unused. Therefore, monitoring and managing water resources by assessing comprehensive surface runoff (SR) potential is crucial instead of relying on broad sub-watershed (SW) generalizations. This study aims to identify the characteristics of landscape evolution and hydro-physical factors that influence SR. It prioritizes the SR potentials of SWs by examining multi-dimensional aspects of hybrid MCDM models integrated with ensemble machine learning techniques. Findings show SW shapes vary from elongated (0.57) to oval (0.87). Stream length ratios ranging from SW4 (0.61) to SW5 (9.99) indicate diverse slope magnitudes and geomorphic development stages. Moderate drainage densities (0.65–0.89 km/km<sup>2</sup>) indicate underlying litho-structural influences on drainage networks. Low to moderate drainage textures (1.33–2.33) suggest potential SR zones, mainly due to the Proterozoic gneissic complex dominance. Landscape evolution analysis shows SWs are at an early mature stage (average 0.49). The prioritization results from the hydro-morphotectonic (MPT) and hydro-physical (HYP) TOPSIS and VIKOR integrated extra trees regression (ETR) models achieve the best accuracy, followed by XGBoost, Bagging, and Voting models. Among the 24 models analyzed, TOPCOM-ETR (RMSE = 0.106), VIKHYP-ETR (RMSE = 0.093), and TOPMPT-ETR (RMSE = 0.129) are found most effective for prioritizing SWs. The study identifies that sloping SWs 1–2, 9–11, besides concave SWs 5 and 8, are optimal for maximizing SR. The TOPCOM-ETR model highlights the foothill SWs with the highest runoff potential based on relief, slope, and hydrological features. The findings of this study can help guide government agencies in making informed decisions to tackle water-related challenges and uncertainties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"386 ","pages":"Article 125772"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the morpho-tectonic nature, hydrological and physical characteristics of a watershed and prioritizing sub-watersheds surface runoff potentialities by integrating MCDM and ensemble machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"Sribas Kanji,&nbsp;Subhasish Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Much effective rainfall often leads to natural and human-induced hazards when unused. Therefore, monitoring and managing water resources by assessing comprehensive surface runoff (SR) potential is crucial instead of relying on broad sub-watershed (SW) generalizations. This study aims to identify the characteristics of landscape evolution and hydro-physical factors that influence SR. It prioritizes the SR potentials of SWs by examining multi-dimensional aspects of hybrid MCDM models integrated with ensemble machine learning techniques. Findings show SW shapes vary from elongated (0.57) to oval (0.87). Stream length ratios ranging from SW4 (0.61) to SW5 (9.99) indicate diverse slope magnitudes and geomorphic development stages. Moderate drainage densities (0.65–0.89 km/km<sup>2</sup>) indicate underlying litho-structural influences on drainage networks. Low to moderate drainage textures (1.33–2.33) suggest potential SR zones, mainly due to the Proterozoic gneissic complex dominance. Landscape evolution analysis shows SWs are at an early mature stage (average 0.49). The prioritization results from the hydro-morphotectonic (MPT) and hydro-physical (HYP) TOPSIS and VIKOR integrated extra trees regression (ETR) models achieve the best accuracy, followed by XGBoost, Bagging, and Voting models. Among the 24 models analyzed, TOPCOM-ETR (RMSE = 0.106), VIKHYP-ETR (RMSE = 0.093), and TOPMPT-ETR (RMSE = 0.129) are found most effective for prioritizing SWs. The study identifies that sloping SWs 1–2, 9–11, besides concave SWs 5 and 8, are optimal for maximizing SR. The TOPCOM-ETR model highlights the foothill SWs with the highest runoff potential based on relief, slope, and hydrological features. The findings of this study can help guide government agencies in making informed decisions to tackle water-related challenges and uncertainties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"386 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725017487\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725017487","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多有效降雨在未使用时往往会导致自然和人为危害。因此,通过评估综合地表径流(SR)潜力来监测和管理水资源是至关重要的,而不是依赖于广泛的分流域(SW)概括。本研究旨在识别影响SR的景观演化特征和水物理因素,并通过结合集成机器学习技术的混合MCDM模型的多维方面来优先考虑SWs的SR潜力。结果显示,SW的形状从细长(0.57)到椭圆形(0.87)不等。河流长度比SW4(0.61)至SW5(9.99)表明不同的坡度大小和地貌发育阶段。中等的排水密度(0.65-0.89 km/km2)表明潜在的岩石构造对排水网络的影响。低至中等水系结构(1.33 ~ 2.33)显示出潜在的SR带,主要由元古代片麻岩杂岩主导。景观演化分析表明,SWs处于早期成熟阶段(平均0.49)。水体形态构造(MPT)和水体物理(HYP) TOPSIS和VIKOR综合额外树回归(ETR)模型的优选结果精度最高,其次是XGBoost、Bagging和Voting模型。在分析的24个模型中,TOPCOM-ETR (RMSE = 0.106)、vikhypp - etr (RMSE = 0.093)和TOPMPT-ETR (RMSE = 0.129)对SWs的优先级排序最有效。研究发现,坡地SWs 1-2、9-11,以及凹地SWs 5和8是最大径流潜力的最佳选择。TOPCOM-ETR模型基于地形、坡度和水文特征,突出了山麓SWs径流潜力最大的区域。这项研究的结果可以帮助指导政府机构做出明智的决策,以应对与水有关的挑战和不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the morpho-tectonic nature, hydrological and physical characteristics of a watershed and prioritizing sub-watersheds surface runoff potentialities by integrating MCDM and ensemble machine learning models
Much effective rainfall often leads to natural and human-induced hazards when unused. Therefore, monitoring and managing water resources by assessing comprehensive surface runoff (SR) potential is crucial instead of relying on broad sub-watershed (SW) generalizations. This study aims to identify the characteristics of landscape evolution and hydro-physical factors that influence SR. It prioritizes the SR potentials of SWs by examining multi-dimensional aspects of hybrid MCDM models integrated with ensemble machine learning techniques. Findings show SW shapes vary from elongated (0.57) to oval (0.87). Stream length ratios ranging from SW4 (0.61) to SW5 (9.99) indicate diverse slope magnitudes and geomorphic development stages. Moderate drainage densities (0.65–0.89 km/km2) indicate underlying litho-structural influences on drainage networks. Low to moderate drainage textures (1.33–2.33) suggest potential SR zones, mainly due to the Proterozoic gneissic complex dominance. Landscape evolution analysis shows SWs are at an early mature stage (average 0.49). The prioritization results from the hydro-morphotectonic (MPT) and hydro-physical (HYP) TOPSIS and VIKOR integrated extra trees regression (ETR) models achieve the best accuracy, followed by XGBoost, Bagging, and Voting models. Among the 24 models analyzed, TOPCOM-ETR (RMSE = 0.106), VIKHYP-ETR (RMSE = 0.093), and TOPMPT-ETR (RMSE = 0.129) are found most effective for prioritizing SWs. The study identifies that sloping SWs 1–2, 9–11, besides concave SWs 5 and 8, are optimal for maximizing SR. The TOPCOM-ETR model highlights the foothill SWs with the highest runoff potential based on relief, slope, and hydrological features. The findings of this study can help guide government agencies in making informed decisions to tackle water-related challenges and uncertainties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信