脂肪酸-甲酯和加氢处理植物油生物燃料在未来船用发动机中的可行性的经济和环境评价

Q1 Environmental Science
Olakunle Oloruntobi , Kasypi Mokhtar , Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan , Adel Gohari , Vincent Onigbara , Norlinda Rozar , N.L. Balasudarsun
{"title":"脂肪酸-甲酯和加氢处理植物油生物燃料在未来船用发动机中的可行性的经济和环境评价","authors":"Olakunle Oloruntobi ,&nbsp;Kasypi Mokhtar ,&nbsp;Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan ,&nbsp;Adel Gohari ,&nbsp;Vincent Onigbara ,&nbsp;Norlinda Rozar ,&nbsp;N.L. Balasudarsun","doi":"10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the viability of fatty-acid-methyl-ester (FAME) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biofuels in reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in marine engines, aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13. Secondary data were used for impact assessment, sustainability, and optimization, as well as sensitivity analyses to address biofuel adoption challenges. It further assesses the biofuels' production, regulations, environmental, and life-cycle impacts, estimating their sustainable transition costs. A decade-long review from 2013 to 2024 found that HVO reduced carbon emissions by 90 %, outperforming Diesel and FAME. HVO's catalytic methanation costs $5 × 10<sup>6</sup>–$500 × 10<sup>6</sup> million (M) with a 1 × 10<sup>3</sup>–1 × 10<sup>5</sup> liters (L) production capacity per day and a 30-year lifespan. FAME costs $0.66/L, while second-generation HVO emits 8–48 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ, considerably lower than marine gas oil (MGO)s 85–87 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Both biofuels demonstrated prospects for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but their adoption requires regulatory support, technological advances, and strategic planning to help the maritime sector lower its carbon footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8947,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology Reports","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 102146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic and environmental assessment of fatty-acid-methyl-ester and hydrotreated vegetable oil biofuels viability for future marine engines\",\"authors\":\"Olakunle Oloruntobi ,&nbsp;Kasypi Mokhtar ,&nbsp;Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan ,&nbsp;Adel Gohari ,&nbsp;Vincent Onigbara ,&nbsp;Norlinda Rozar ,&nbsp;N.L. Balasudarsun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the viability of fatty-acid-methyl-ester (FAME) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biofuels in reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in marine engines, aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13. Secondary data were used for impact assessment, sustainability, and optimization, as well as sensitivity analyses to address biofuel adoption challenges. It further assesses the biofuels' production, regulations, environmental, and life-cycle impacts, estimating their sustainable transition costs. A decade-long review from 2013 to 2024 found that HVO reduced carbon emissions by 90 %, outperforming Diesel and FAME. HVO's catalytic methanation costs $5 × 10<sup>6</sup>–$500 × 10<sup>6</sup> million (M) with a 1 × 10<sup>3</sup>–1 × 10<sup>5</sup> liters (L) production capacity per day and a 30-year lifespan. FAME costs $0.66/L, while second-generation HVO emits 8–48 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ, considerably lower than marine gas oil (MGO)s 85–87 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Both biofuels demonstrated prospects for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but their adoption requires regulatory support, technological advances, and strategic planning to help the maritime sector lower its carbon footprint.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了脂肪酸甲酯(FAME)和加氢处理植物油(HVO)生物燃料在减少船用发动机全球温室气体(GHG)排放方面的可行性,以符合联合国可持续发展目标(SDG) 13。次要数据用于影响评估、可持续性和优化,以及应对生物燃料采用挑战的敏感性分析。它进一步评估了生物燃料的生产、法规、环境和生命周期影响,估计了它们的可持续过渡成本。从2013年到2024年长达十年的回顾发现,HVO减少了90%的碳排放,优于柴油和FAME。HVO的催化甲烷化成本为5 × 106 - 5 × 106亿美元(M),每天的生产能力为1 × 103-1 × 105升,使用寿命为30年。FAME的成本为0.66美元/升,而第二代HVO的排放量为8-48 gCO2e/MJ,大大低于船用柴油(MGO)的85-87 gCO2e/MJ。这两种生物燃料都显示出减少二氧化碳排放的前景,但它们的采用需要监管支持、技术进步和战略规划,以帮助海事部门降低碳足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic and environmental assessment of fatty-acid-methyl-ester and hydrotreated vegetable oil biofuels viability for future marine engines
This study explores the viability of fatty-acid-methyl-ester (FAME) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biofuels in reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in marine engines, aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13. Secondary data were used for impact assessment, sustainability, and optimization, as well as sensitivity analyses to address biofuel adoption challenges. It further assesses the biofuels' production, regulations, environmental, and life-cycle impacts, estimating their sustainable transition costs. A decade-long review from 2013 to 2024 found that HVO reduced carbon emissions by 90 %, outperforming Diesel and FAME. HVO's catalytic methanation costs $5 × 106–$500 × 106 million (M) with a 1 × 103–1 × 105 liters (L) production capacity per day and a 30-year lifespan. FAME costs $0.66/L, while second-generation HVO emits 8–48 gCO2e/MJ, considerably lower than marine gas oil (MGO)s 85–87 gCO2e/MJ. Both biofuels demonstrated prospects for reducing CO2 emissions, but their adoption requires regulatory support, technological advances, and strategic planning to help the maritime sector lower its carbon footprint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioresource Technology Reports
Bioresource Technology Reports Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
390
审稿时长
28 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信