{"title":"脂肪酸-甲酯和加氢处理植物油生物燃料在未来船用发动机中的可行性的经济和环境评价","authors":"Olakunle Oloruntobi , Kasypi Mokhtar , Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan , Adel Gohari , Vincent Onigbara , Norlinda Rozar , N.L. Balasudarsun","doi":"10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the viability of fatty-acid-methyl-ester (FAME) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biofuels in reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in marine engines, aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13. Secondary data were used for impact assessment, sustainability, and optimization, as well as sensitivity analyses to address biofuel adoption challenges. It further assesses the biofuels' production, regulations, environmental, and life-cycle impacts, estimating their sustainable transition costs. A decade-long review from 2013 to 2024 found that HVO reduced carbon emissions by 90 %, outperforming Diesel and FAME. HVO's catalytic methanation costs $5 × 10<sup>6</sup>–$500 × 10<sup>6</sup> million (M) with a 1 × 10<sup>3</sup>–1 × 10<sup>5</sup> liters (L) production capacity per day and a 30-year lifespan. FAME costs $0.66/L, while second-generation HVO emits 8–48 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ, considerably lower than marine gas oil (MGO)s 85–87 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Both biofuels demonstrated prospects for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but their adoption requires regulatory support, technological advances, and strategic planning to help the maritime sector lower its carbon footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8947,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology Reports","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 102146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic and environmental assessment of fatty-acid-methyl-ester and hydrotreated vegetable oil biofuels viability for future marine engines\",\"authors\":\"Olakunle Oloruntobi , Kasypi Mokhtar , Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan , Adel Gohari , Vincent Onigbara , Norlinda Rozar , N.L. Balasudarsun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the viability of fatty-acid-methyl-ester (FAME) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biofuels in reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in marine engines, aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13. Secondary data were used for impact assessment, sustainability, and optimization, as well as sensitivity analyses to address biofuel adoption challenges. It further assesses the biofuels' production, regulations, environmental, and life-cycle impacts, estimating their sustainable transition costs. A decade-long review from 2013 to 2024 found that HVO reduced carbon emissions by 90 %, outperforming Diesel and FAME. HVO's catalytic methanation costs $5 × 10<sup>6</sup>–$500 × 10<sup>6</sup> million (M) with a 1 × 10<sup>3</sup>–1 × 10<sup>5</sup> liters (L) production capacity per day and a 30-year lifespan. FAME costs $0.66/L, while second-generation HVO emits 8–48 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ, considerably lower than marine gas oil (MGO)s 85–87 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Both biofuels demonstrated prospects for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but their adoption requires regulatory support, technological advances, and strategic planning to help the maritime sector lower its carbon footprint.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic and environmental assessment of fatty-acid-methyl-ester and hydrotreated vegetable oil biofuels viability for future marine engines
This study explores the viability of fatty-acid-methyl-ester (FAME) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biofuels in reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in marine engines, aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13. Secondary data were used for impact assessment, sustainability, and optimization, as well as sensitivity analyses to address biofuel adoption challenges. It further assesses the biofuels' production, regulations, environmental, and life-cycle impacts, estimating their sustainable transition costs. A decade-long review from 2013 to 2024 found that HVO reduced carbon emissions by 90 %, outperforming Diesel and FAME. HVO's catalytic methanation costs $5 × 106–$500 × 106 million (M) with a 1 × 103–1 × 105 liters (L) production capacity per day and a 30-year lifespan. FAME costs $0.66/L, while second-generation HVO emits 8–48 gCO2e/MJ, considerably lower than marine gas oil (MGO)s 85–87 gCO2e/MJ. Both biofuels demonstrated prospects for reducing CO2 emissions, but their adoption requires regulatory support, technological advances, and strategic planning to help the maritime sector lower its carbon footprint.