功能限制和自杀意念:在全国代表性样本中独立、互动和累积的关联

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ying Cui
{"title":"功能限制和自杀意念:在全国代表性样本中独立、互动和累积的关联","authors":"Ying Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Suicidal ideation is a critical public health issue, often linked to functional limitations that hinder daily activities. However, the independent, interactive, and cumulative effects of specific types and quantities of functional limitations on suicidal ideation remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were analyzed from 12,263 U.S. adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013–2018). Functional limitations were assessed across six domains: vision, hearing, cognitive, mobility, dressing/bathing, and errands. Multivariable logistic regression and interaction models were used to examine associations between functional limitations and suicidal ideation. Dose-response relationships were evaluated using restricted cubic spline regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Vision (OR = 1.77, 95 % CI = 1.00–3.13), cognitive (OR = 5.52, 95 % CI = 3.63–8.39), and errand limitations (OR = 1.75, 95 % CI = 1.09–2.79) were independently associated with suicidal ideation. A significant interaction effect was observed between hearing and cognitive limitations, with the co-occurrence amplifying suicidal ideation risk (OR = 5.80, 95 % CI = 3.84–8.78). Additionally, a dose-response relationship was found, with individuals experiencing ≥5 limitations having the highest risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Functional limitations, particularly cognitive and errand-related impairments, are strongly associated with suicidal ideation. Interaction effects and cumulative impacts underscore the need for integrated mental and physical healthcare approaches. Tailored interventions targeting specific limitations and addressing cumulative burdens may mitigate suicidal ideation in this vulnerable population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"95 ","pages":"Pages 148-157"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional limitations and suicidal ideation: Independent, interactive, and cumulative associations in a nationally representative sample\",\"authors\":\"Ying Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Suicidal ideation is a critical public health issue, often linked to functional limitations that hinder daily activities. However, the independent, interactive, and cumulative effects of specific types and quantities of functional limitations on suicidal ideation remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were analyzed from 12,263 U.S. adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013–2018). Functional limitations were assessed across six domains: vision, hearing, cognitive, mobility, dressing/bathing, and errands. Multivariable logistic regression and interaction models were used to examine associations between functional limitations and suicidal ideation. Dose-response relationships were evaluated using restricted cubic spline regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Vision (OR = 1.77, 95 % CI = 1.00–3.13), cognitive (OR = 5.52, 95 % CI = 3.63–8.39), and errand limitations (OR = 1.75, 95 % CI = 1.09–2.79) were independently associated with suicidal ideation. A significant interaction effect was observed between hearing and cognitive limitations, with the co-occurrence amplifying suicidal ideation risk (OR = 5.80, 95 % CI = 3.84–8.78). Additionally, a dose-response relationship was found, with individuals experiencing ≥5 limitations having the highest risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Functional limitations, particularly cognitive and errand-related impairments, are strongly associated with suicidal ideation. Interaction effects and cumulative impacts underscore the need for integrated mental and physical healthcare approaches. Tailored interventions targeting specific limitations and addressing cumulative burdens may mitigate suicidal ideation in this vulnerable population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 148-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景自杀意念是一个重要的公共卫生问题,通常与妨碍日常活动的功能限制有关。然而,特定类型和数量的功能限制对自杀意念的独立、互动和累积影响仍未得到充分探讨。方法分析全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES, 2013-2018)中12263名美国成年人的数据。功能限制在六个领域进行评估:视觉、听力、认知、活动、穿衣/洗澡和差事。多变量逻辑回归和相互作用模型被用来检验功能限制和自杀意念之间的关系。使用限制三次样条回归评估剂量-反应关系。结果视觉(OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.00-3.13)、认知(OR = 5.52, 95% CI = 3.63-8.39)和差使限制(OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.09-2.79)与自杀意念独立相关。听力障碍与认知障碍之间存在显著的交互作用,同时存在会放大自杀意念风险(OR = 5.80, 95% CI = 3.84 ~ 8.78)。此外,还发现了剂量-反应关系,经历≥5个限制的个体风险最高。结论功能障碍,尤其是认知和工作相关障碍,与自杀意念密切相关。相互作用效应和累积影响强调需要综合的心理和身体保健方法。针对特定限制和解决累积负担的量身定制的干预措施可能会减轻这一弱势群体的自杀意念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional limitations and suicidal ideation: Independent, interactive, and cumulative associations in a nationally representative sample

Background

Suicidal ideation is a critical public health issue, often linked to functional limitations that hinder daily activities. However, the independent, interactive, and cumulative effects of specific types and quantities of functional limitations on suicidal ideation remain underexplored.

Methods

Data were analyzed from 12,263 U.S. adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013–2018). Functional limitations were assessed across six domains: vision, hearing, cognitive, mobility, dressing/bathing, and errands. Multivariable logistic regression and interaction models were used to examine associations between functional limitations and suicidal ideation. Dose-response relationships were evaluated using restricted cubic spline regression.

Results

Vision (OR = 1.77, 95 % CI = 1.00–3.13), cognitive (OR = 5.52, 95 % CI = 3.63–8.39), and errand limitations (OR = 1.75, 95 % CI = 1.09–2.79) were independently associated with suicidal ideation. A significant interaction effect was observed between hearing and cognitive limitations, with the co-occurrence amplifying suicidal ideation risk (OR = 5.80, 95 % CI = 3.84–8.78). Additionally, a dose-response relationship was found, with individuals experiencing ≥5 limitations having the highest risk.

Conclusions

Functional limitations, particularly cognitive and errand-related impairments, are strongly associated with suicidal ideation. Interaction effects and cumulative impacts underscore the need for integrated mental and physical healthcare approaches. Tailored interventions targeting specific limitations and addressing cumulative burdens may mitigate suicidal ideation in this vulnerable population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信