Charlotte Taylor , Hannah Gold , David Watson , Anthony Darby , Richard Ball , Tim Ibell , Will Hawkins
{"title":"在坚实的基础上:评估英国结构石的扩大潜力","authors":"Charlotte Taylor , Hannah Gold , David Watson , Anthony Darby , Richard Ball , Tim Ibell , Will Hawkins","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concrete, a ubiquitous material in construction, is primarily composed of crushed limestone bound by cement, the production of which accounts for over 8% of global carbon emissions. Solid stone, in contrast, requires significantly less energy to produce, with its processing limited to extraction, cutting, and transportation. This makes it an increasingly attractive low-carbon alternative. Recent collaborations between structural engineers and stonemasons in the UK have demonstrated the technical feasibility of load-bearing and prestressed stone building systems. However, the potential for scaling up the use of structural stone in construction remains largely unexplored. To assess the scale-up potential of structural stone in the UK, our research employed a qualitative and quantitative design involving 19 in-depth interviews with stone quarry and mine managers across the UK and Europe. We found that, as perceived by our sample of interviewees, the biggest reported bottleneck to scaling up structural stone production in the UK is the availability and cost of labour; that a change in architectural preference of aesthetics and stone sizes could reduce waste, energy use and drive down costs; that there is lack of demand for structural stone products despite the increasing interest in it as a low-carbon material; that the decarbonisation potential of stone rests on investment in the sector; and that the total stone resource is not limiting but the process to extend existing, or open new, quarries needs streamlining to allow for rapid scale up. We anticipate our study to be a foundation for strategic planning and investment, enabling stone to reduce the embodied emissions of buildings and be produced economically at scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 105601"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On solid ground: Assessing the scale-up potential of structural stone in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Taylor , Hannah Gold , David Watson , Anthony Darby , Richard Ball , Tim Ibell , Will Hawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Concrete, a ubiquitous material in construction, is primarily composed of crushed limestone bound by cement, the production of which accounts for over 8% of global carbon emissions. Solid stone, in contrast, requires significantly less energy to produce, with its processing limited to extraction, cutting, and transportation. This makes it an increasingly attractive low-carbon alternative. Recent collaborations between structural engineers and stonemasons in the UK have demonstrated the technical feasibility of load-bearing and prestressed stone building systems. However, the potential for scaling up the use of structural stone in construction remains largely unexplored. To assess the scale-up potential of structural stone in the UK, our research employed a qualitative and quantitative design involving 19 in-depth interviews with stone quarry and mine managers across the UK and Europe. We found that, as perceived by our sample of interviewees, the biggest reported bottleneck to scaling up structural stone production in the UK is the availability and cost of labour; that a change in architectural preference of aesthetics and stone sizes could reduce waste, energy use and drive down costs; that there is lack of demand for structural stone products despite the increasing interest in it as a low-carbon material; that the decarbonisation potential of stone rests on investment in the sector; and that the total stone resource is not limiting but the process to extend existing, or open new, quarries needs streamlining to allow for rapid scale up. We anticipate our study to be a foundation for strategic planning and investment, enabling stone to reduce the embodied emissions of buildings and be produced economically at scale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725001436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725001436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
On solid ground: Assessing the scale-up potential of structural stone in the UK
Concrete, a ubiquitous material in construction, is primarily composed of crushed limestone bound by cement, the production of which accounts for over 8% of global carbon emissions. Solid stone, in contrast, requires significantly less energy to produce, with its processing limited to extraction, cutting, and transportation. This makes it an increasingly attractive low-carbon alternative. Recent collaborations between structural engineers and stonemasons in the UK have demonstrated the technical feasibility of load-bearing and prestressed stone building systems. However, the potential for scaling up the use of structural stone in construction remains largely unexplored. To assess the scale-up potential of structural stone in the UK, our research employed a qualitative and quantitative design involving 19 in-depth interviews with stone quarry and mine managers across the UK and Europe. We found that, as perceived by our sample of interviewees, the biggest reported bottleneck to scaling up structural stone production in the UK is the availability and cost of labour; that a change in architectural preference of aesthetics and stone sizes could reduce waste, energy use and drive down costs; that there is lack of demand for structural stone products despite the increasing interest in it as a low-carbon material; that the decarbonisation potential of stone rests on investment in the sector; and that the total stone resource is not limiting but the process to extend existing, or open new, quarries needs streamlining to allow for rapid scale up. We anticipate our study to be a foundation for strategic planning and investment, enabling stone to reduce the embodied emissions of buildings and be produced economically at scale.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.