{"title":"弹性裸子植物:重新评估梅山二叠纪-三叠纪物种灭绝的花卉动态","authors":"Elke Schneebeli-Hermann , Francesca Galasso","doi":"10.1016/j.revpalbo.2025.105373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of the Permian–Triassic mass extinction on terrestrial plant diversity and ecosystems is still controversially discussed. While for numerous plant fossil records, particularly those from terrestrial sites, adequate dating is unfeasible, for plant microfossil records, deposited in marine environments, independent biostratigraphic dating is usually possible. Since the ratification of the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Permian–Triassic boundary in Meishan, a plethora of not only palynological data but also precise geochronological ages, high-resolution geochemical and biostratigraphic datasets are available. Here, we aim to revise the palynological data published by Ouyang & Utting in 1990 in the current geochronological framework. Their three initially described assemblage zones yield a wealth of information with respect to depositional environment and vegetation composition- from an off-shore Permian setting to a more proximal setting in the Triassic. To date, the comparison of the palynological data with the carbon isotope record, current lithostratigraphy, and U/Pb ages indicates that gymnosperm-dominated vegetation thrived during and after the Permian–Triassic extinction event in the continental area near Meishan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54488,"journal":{"name":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","volume":"341 ","pages":"Article 105373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilient gymnosperms: reassessing floral dynamics at the permian–triassic extinction in Meishan\",\"authors\":\"Elke Schneebeli-Hermann , Francesca Galasso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.revpalbo.2025.105373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The impact of the Permian–Triassic mass extinction on terrestrial plant diversity and ecosystems is still controversially discussed. While for numerous plant fossil records, particularly those from terrestrial sites, adequate dating is unfeasible, for plant microfossil records, deposited in marine environments, independent biostratigraphic dating is usually possible. Since the ratification of the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Permian–Triassic boundary in Meishan, a plethora of not only palynological data but also precise geochronological ages, high-resolution geochemical and biostratigraphic datasets are available. Here, we aim to revise the palynological data published by Ouyang & Utting in 1990 in the current geochronological framework. Their three initially described assemblage zones yield a wealth of information with respect to depositional environment and vegetation composition- from an off-shore Permian setting to a more proximal setting in the Triassic. To date, the comparison of the palynological data with the carbon isotope record, current lithostratigraphy, and U/Pb ages indicates that gymnosperm-dominated vegetation thrived during and after the Permian–Triassic extinction event in the continental area near Meishan.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology\",\"volume\":\"341 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034666725000946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034666725000946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Resilient gymnosperms: reassessing floral dynamics at the permian–triassic extinction in Meishan
The impact of the Permian–Triassic mass extinction on terrestrial plant diversity and ecosystems is still controversially discussed. While for numerous plant fossil records, particularly those from terrestrial sites, adequate dating is unfeasible, for plant microfossil records, deposited in marine environments, independent biostratigraphic dating is usually possible. Since the ratification of the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Permian–Triassic boundary in Meishan, a plethora of not only palynological data but also precise geochronological ages, high-resolution geochemical and biostratigraphic datasets are available. Here, we aim to revise the palynological data published by Ouyang & Utting in 1990 in the current geochronological framework. Their three initially described assemblage zones yield a wealth of information with respect to depositional environment and vegetation composition- from an off-shore Permian setting to a more proximal setting in the Triassic. To date, the comparison of the palynological data with the carbon isotope record, current lithostratigraphy, and U/Pb ages indicates that gymnosperm-dominated vegetation thrived during and after the Permian–Triassic extinction event in the continental area near Meishan.
期刊介绍:
The Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology is an international journal for articles in all fields of palaeobotany and palynology dealing with all groups, ranging from marine palynomorphs to higher land plants. Original contributions and comprehensive review papers should appeal to an international audience. Typical topics include but are not restricted to systematics, evolution, palaeobiology, palaeoecology, biostratigraphy, biochronology, palaeoclimatology, paleogeography, taphonomy, palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, vegetation history, and practical applications of palaeobotany and palynology, e.g. in coal and petroleum geology and archaeology. The journal especially encourages the publication of articles in which palaeobotany and palynology are applied for solving fundamental geological and biological problems as well as innovative and interdisciplinary approaches.