迈向公平、智慧和可持续的城市交通：治理原型及其关系

IF 7.3 1区工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment Pub Date : 2025-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2025.104797

Katharina Burger

{"title":"迈向公平、智慧和可持续的城市交通：治理原型及其关系","authors":"Katharina Burger","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines expert perceptions on achieving equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility and transport development. Through qualitative interview analysis, we identify five archetypes with distinct core values, causal attributions, and rationales: the Institutional Architect, Behaviour & Culture Challenger, Equity Champion, Resource Optimiser, and Inclusive Mobiliser. We propose a framework to consider these archetypes relationally along the dimensions of ‘orientation’ (system | people) and ‘approach’ (incremental | transformative). We discuss the implications of our findings, highlighting their potential in diverse, pluralistic decision-making environments characteristic of mobility and transport planning. Our study contributes a framework and conceptual repertoire of archetypes to support constructive decision-making in complex contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104797"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility: Governance archetypes and their relations\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Burger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines expert perceptions on achieving equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility and transport development. Through qualitative interview analysis, we identify five archetypes with distinct core values, causal attributions, and rationales: the Institutional Architect, Behaviour & Culture Challenger, Equity Champion, Resource Optimiser, and Inclusive Mobiliser. We propose a framework to consider these archetypes relationally along the dimensions of ‘orientation’ (system | people) and ‘approach’ (incremental | transformative). We discuss the implications of our findings, highlighting their potential in diverse, pluralistic decision-making environments characteristic of mobility and transport planning. Our study contributes a framework and conceptual repertoire of archetypes to support constructive decision-making in complex contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"145 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136192092500207X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136192092500207X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了专家对实现公平、智能和可持续的城市交通和交通发展的看法。通过定性访谈分析，我们确定了五种具有不同核心价值、因果归因和基本原理的原型：制度架构师、行为和行为；文化挑战者、公平捍卫者、资源优化者和包容性动员者。我们提出了一个框架，沿着“取向”（系统b|人）和“方法”（增量b|变革）的维度来考虑这些原型的关系。我们讨论了我们的研究结果的含义，强调了它们在流动性和运输规划的多样化、多元化决策环境中的潜力。我们的研究提供了一个框架和原型的概念库，以支持复杂背景下的建设性决策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Towards equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility: Governance archetypes and their relations

This study examines expert perceptions on achieving equitable, smart, and sustainable urban mobility and transport development. Through qualitative interview analysis, we identify five archetypes with distinct core values, causal attributions, and rationales: the Institutional Architect, Behaviour & Culture Challenger, Equity Champion, Resource Optimiser, and Inclusive Mobiliser. We propose a framework to consider these archetypes relationally along the dimensions of ‘orientation’ (system | people) and ‘approach’ (incremental | transformative). We discuss the implications of our findings, highlighting their potential in diverse, pluralistic decision-making environments characteristic of mobility and transport planning. Our study contributes a framework and conceptual repertoire of archetypes to support constructive decision-making in complex contexts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment 工程技术-运输科技

CiteScore

14.40

自引率

9.20%

发文量

314

审稿时长

39 days

期刊介绍： Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.