传统与纳米材料选择性回收铜阳极泥中硒/碲的比较研究

IF 3.9 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ambikesh Soni , Suresh Sundaramurthy , Anil Kumar Sharma
{"title":"传统与纳米材料选择性回收铜阳极泥中硒/碲的比较研究","authors":"Ambikesh Soni ,&nbsp;Suresh Sundaramurthy ,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The selective recovery of valuable elements from copper anode slime represents a crucial approach to recycling and sustainability. While conventional methods such as oxidative roasting, leaching, and electrolytic refining have been widely adopted, they present disadvantages including high energy consumption, low selectivity, and environmental concerns. Nanomaterials have emerged as promising alternatives, offering enhanced selectivity and efficiency due to their high surface area, tunable properties, and specific interactions with metal ions. This study compares conventional and nanomaterial-based methodologies regarding their efficiency, cost implications, and environmental impacts. Traditional multi-step processes often compromise the purity of recovered elements, whereas functionalized nanoparticles and nanocomposites with their unique nanoscale surface interactions significantly enhance recovery rates and selectivity. Furthermore, this review evaluates the upscaling potential of nanotechnologies, highlighting comparative benefits of traditional methods while emphasizing substantial advancements through research and development. The ongoing evolution of nanomaterial-based technologies underscores the necessity for continued research and innovation to refine applications for selenium and tellurium recovery, ultimately leading to more efficient processing of copper anode slime.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18233,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science and Engineering: B","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 118424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between conventional and nanomaterial-based methods for selective recovery of selenium/tellurium from copper anode slime\",\"authors\":\"Ambikesh Soni ,&nbsp;Suresh Sundaramurthy ,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The selective recovery of valuable elements from copper anode slime represents a crucial approach to recycling and sustainability. While conventional methods such as oxidative roasting, leaching, and electrolytic refining have been widely adopted, they present disadvantages including high energy consumption, low selectivity, and environmental concerns. Nanomaterials have emerged as promising alternatives, offering enhanced selectivity and efficiency due to their high surface area, tunable properties, and specific interactions with metal ions. This study compares conventional and nanomaterial-based methodologies regarding their efficiency, cost implications, and environmental impacts. Traditional multi-step processes often compromise the purity of recovered elements, whereas functionalized nanoparticles and nanocomposites with their unique nanoscale surface interactions significantly enhance recovery rates and selectivity. Furthermore, this review evaluates the upscaling potential of nanotechnologies, highlighting comparative benefits of traditional methods while emphasizing substantial advancements through research and development. The ongoing evolution of nanomaterial-based technologies underscores the necessity for continued research and innovation to refine applications for selenium and tellurium recovery, ultimately leading to more efficient processing of copper anode slime.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials Science and Engineering: B\",\"volume\":\"320 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials Science and Engineering: B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921510725004489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science and Engineering: B","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921510725004489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从铜阳极泥中选择性地回收有价值的元素是回收和可持续发展的重要途径。虽然氧化焙烧、浸出和电解精炼等传统方法已被广泛采用,但它们存在高能耗、低选择性和环境问题等缺点。纳米材料已经成为一种很有前途的替代品,由于其高表面积、可调性质以及与金属离子的特定相互作用,纳米材料提供了更高的选择性和效率。本研究比较了传统方法和基于纳米材料的方法在效率、成本和环境影响方面的差异。传统的多步骤工艺往往会降低回收元素的纯度,而功能化纳米颗粒和纳米复合材料具有独特的纳米级表面相互作用,可显著提高回收率和选择性。此外,本文评估了纳米技术的升级潜力,强调了传统方法的相对优势,同时强调了通过研究和开发取得的实质性进展。纳米材料技术的不断发展强调了继续研究和创新的必要性,以改进硒和碲回收的应用,最终导致更有效地处理铜阳极泥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study between conventional and nanomaterial-based methods for selective recovery of selenium/tellurium from copper anode slime
The selective recovery of valuable elements from copper anode slime represents a crucial approach to recycling and sustainability. While conventional methods such as oxidative roasting, leaching, and electrolytic refining have been widely adopted, they present disadvantages including high energy consumption, low selectivity, and environmental concerns. Nanomaterials have emerged as promising alternatives, offering enhanced selectivity and efficiency due to their high surface area, tunable properties, and specific interactions with metal ions. This study compares conventional and nanomaterial-based methodologies regarding their efficiency, cost implications, and environmental impacts. Traditional multi-step processes often compromise the purity of recovered elements, whereas functionalized nanoparticles and nanocomposites with their unique nanoscale surface interactions significantly enhance recovery rates and selectivity. Furthermore, this review evaluates the upscaling potential of nanotechnologies, highlighting comparative benefits of traditional methods while emphasizing substantial advancements through research and development. The ongoing evolution of nanomaterial-based technologies underscores the necessity for continued research and innovation to refine applications for selenium and tellurium recovery, ultimately leading to more efficient processing of copper anode slime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials Science and Engineering: B
Materials Science and Engineering: B 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The journal provides an international medium for the publication of theoretical and experimental studies and reviews related to the electronic, electrochemical, ionic, magnetic, optical, and biosensing properties of solid state materials in bulk, thin film and particulate forms. Papers dealing with synthesis, processing, characterization, structure, physical properties and computational aspects of nano-crystalline, crystalline, amorphous and glassy forms of ceramics, semiconductors, layered insertion compounds, low-dimensional compounds and systems, fast-ion conductors, polymers and dielectrics are viewed as suitable for publication. Articles focused on nano-structured aspects of these advanced solid-state materials will also be considered suitable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信