{"title":"热气候条件下太阳能辅助热电联产系统的多目标优化:经济与环境评价","authors":"Hassan Hajabdollahi, Amin Saleh, Naser Kavousi Yadollahi","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The research investigated a solar-fossil fuel cogeneration system designed to generate power, freshwater, and hydrogen and oxygen in a hot climate. The system comprises multiple components, including the Brayton cycle, heat recovery steam generator, steam turbine, parabolic trough collectors, desalination unit, organic Rankine cycle, and a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer. The optimization approach employed the NSGA-II, aiming to maximize exergy efficiency while minimizing total annual cost. Comprehensive analyses, including energy, exergy, economic, environmental, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental assessments, were conducted. The optimal results indicated that exergy efficiency improved with higher gas turbine inlet temperatures and air compressor pressure ratios, but declined with increasing solar water fractions. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses identified that DB as having the highest exergy destruction cost rate, while the CC exhibited the largest exergy destruction ecological impact rate. In contrast, the solar field demonstrated the lowest cost rate of exergy destruction and minimal ecological impact. The production costs for power, freshwater, and hydrogen–oxygen were determined to be 0.0378 $/kWh, 2.2346 $/<span><math><msup><mrow><mtext>m</mtext></mrow><mtext>3</mtext></msup></math></span>, and 4.0139 $/kg, respectively. The corresponding ecological impact rates were 0.0206 Pts/kWh, 0.7447 Pts/<span><math><msup><mrow><mtext>m</mtext></mrow><mtext>3</mtext></msup></math></span>, and 1.2249 Pts/kg. These findings provide a thorough overview of the system’s performance and optimization from multiple perspectives, highlighting its economic and environmental viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 103656"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-objective optimization of a solar-assisted cogeneration system in hot climate: An exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental assessment\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Hajabdollahi, Amin Saleh, Naser Kavousi Yadollahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The research investigated a solar-fossil fuel cogeneration system designed to generate power, freshwater, and hydrogen and oxygen in a hot climate. The system comprises multiple components, including the Brayton cycle, heat recovery steam generator, steam turbine, parabolic trough collectors, desalination unit, organic Rankine cycle, and a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer. The optimization approach employed the NSGA-II, aiming to maximize exergy efficiency while minimizing total annual cost. Comprehensive analyses, including energy, exergy, economic, environmental, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental assessments, were conducted. The optimal results indicated that exergy efficiency improved with higher gas turbine inlet temperatures and air compressor pressure ratios, but declined with increasing solar water fractions. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses identified that DB as having the highest exergy destruction cost rate, while the CC exhibited the largest exergy destruction ecological impact rate. In contrast, the solar field demonstrated the lowest cost rate of exergy destruction and minimal ecological impact. The production costs for power, freshwater, and hydrogen–oxygen were determined to be 0.0378 $/kWh, 2.2346 $/<span><math><msup><mrow><mtext>m</mtext></mrow><mtext>3</mtext></msup></math></span>, and 4.0139 $/kg, respectively. The corresponding ecological impact rates were 0.0206 Pts/kWh, 0.7447 Pts/<span><math><msup><mrow><mtext>m</mtext></mrow><mtext>3</mtext></msup></math></span>, and 1.2249 Pts/kg. These findings provide a thorough overview of the system’s performance and optimization from multiple perspectives, highlighting its economic and environmental viability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925004469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925004469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-objective optimization of a solar-assisted cogeneration system in hot climate: An exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental assessment
The research investigated a solar-fossil fuel cogeneration system designed to generate power, freshwater, and hydrogen and oxygen in a hot climate. The system comprises multiple components, including the Brayton cycle, heat recovery steam generator, steam turbine, parabolic trough collectors, desalination unit, organic Rankine cycle, and a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer. The optimization approach employed the NSGA-II, aiming to maximize exergy efficiency while minimizing total annual cost. Comprehensive analyses, including energy, exergy, economic, environmental, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental assessments, were conducted. The optimal results indicated that exergy efficiency improved with higher gas turbine inlet temperatures and air compressor pressure ratios, but declined with increasing solar water fractions. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses identified that DB as having the highest exergy destruction cost rate, while the CC exhibited the largest exergy destruction ecological impact rate. In contrast, the solar field demonstrated the lowest cost rate of exergy destruction and minimal ecological impact. The production costs for power, freshwater, and hydrogen–oxygen were determined to be 0.0378 $/kWh, 2.2346 $/, and 4.0139 $/kg, respectively. The corresponding ecological impact rates were 0.0206 Pts/kWh, 0.7447 Pts/, and 1.2249 Pts/kg. These findings provide a thorough overview of the system’s performance and optimization from multiple perspectives, highlighting its economic and environmental viability.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.