中国卫星衍生蒸散发的物理约束机器学习

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Chen Zhang , Chang Zhou , Geping Luo , Su Ye , Zhou Shi
{"title":"中国卫星衍生蒸散发的物理约束机器学习","authors":"Chen Zhang ,&nbsp;Chang Zhou ,&nbsp;Geping Luo ,&nbsp;Su Ye ,&nbsp;Zhou Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evapotranspiration estimates for China derived from empirical and physical models exhibit limited agreement in magnitude and trends, due to the complexity of surface characteristics and climatic conditions. Advances in knowledge-guided data-driven methods allow hybrid models that integrate remote sensing-based ET algorithms with machine learning (ML) to mitigate these discrepancies effectively. We developed two hybrid models, ML_PM and ML_SEB, by coupling the Penman Monteith (PM) and surface energy balance (SEB) algorithm with three ML methods: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and then simulated China’s ET from 2001 to 2022. The hybrid models ML_PM, ML_SEB, replaced empirical formulas of the critical but uncertain parameters: surface resistance (rs) and aerodynamic resistance (ra) with ML, respectively, considering energy balance and turbulent diffusion processes. Hybrid modeling enhanced the representation of physical processes while preserving high estimation accuracy. We evaluated the hybrid models using 63 eddy covariance (EC) sites across China and compared them with process-based physical models and pure ML. Results indicated that the hybrid models ML_PM and ML_SEB substantially improved the performance of the PM (NSE: 0.49) and SEB (NSE: −0.53), achieving NSE values of over 0.8 and 0.6, respectively. ML_PM, in particular, performed on par with pure ML overall and outperformed them for grassland and forest ecosystems, owing to its stronger physical foundation. Moreover, the hybrid models demonstrated greater robustness and generalization under sparse sampling and extreme events compared to pure ML. The optimal hybrid model (RF_PM) produced an annual mean ET of 580.33 ± 9.01 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> for China over 2001–2022, with a statistically insignificant increasing trend (0.52 mm yr<sup>−2</sup>, p &gt; 0.05). Overall, hybrid modeling achieved an optimal balance between physical mechanism and estimation accuracy, offering a new perspective for ET estimation and enhancing our understanding of hydrological processes at regional and global scales under climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"660 ","pages":"Article 133512"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physics-constrained machine learning for satellite-derived evapotranspiration in China\",\"authors\":\"Chen Zhang ,&nbsp;Chang Zhou ,&nbsp;Geping Luo ,&nbsp;Su Ye ,&nbsp;Zhou Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Evapotranspiration estimates for China derived from empirical and physical models exhibit limited agreement in magnitude and trends, due to the complexity of surface characteristics and climatic conditions. Advances in knowledge-guided data-driven methods allow hybrid models that integrate remote sensing-based ET algorithms with machine learning (ML) to mitigate these discrepancies effectively. We developed two hybrid models, ML_PM and ML_SEB, by coupling the Penman Monteith (PM) and surface energy balance (SEB) algorithm with three ML methods: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and then simulated China’s ET from 2001 to 2022. The hybrid models ML_PM, ML_SEB, replaced empirical formulas of the critical but uncertain parameters: surface resistance (rs) and aerodynamic resistance (ra) with ML, respectively, considering energy balance and turbulent diffusion processes. Hybrid modeling enhanced the representation of physical processes while preserving high estimation accuracy. We evaluated the hybrid models using 63 eddy covariance (EC) sites across China and compared them with process-based physical models and pure ML. Results indicated that the hybrid models ML_PM and ML_SEB substantially improved the performance of the PM (NSE: 0.49) and SEB (NSE: −0.53), achieving NSE values of over 0.8 and 0.6, respectively. ML_PM, in particular, performed on par with pure ML overall and outperformed them for grassland and forest ecosystems, owing to its stronger physical foundation. Moreover, the hybrid models demonstrated greater robustness and generalization under sparse sampling and extreme events compared to pure ML. The optimal hybrid model (RF_PM) produced an annual mean ET of 580.33 ± 9.01 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> for China over 2001–2022, with a statistically insignificant increasing trend (0.52 mm yr<sup>−2</sup>, p &gt; 0.05). Overall, hybrid modeling achieved an optimal balance between physical mechanism and estimation accuracy, offering a new perspective for ET estimation and enhancing our understanding of hydrological processes at regional and global scales under climate change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"660 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425008509\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425008509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于地表特征和气候条件的复杂性,从经验模式和物理模式得出的中国蒸散发估计值在量级和趋势上显示出有限的一致性。知识引导的数据驱动方法的进步允许将基于遥感的ET算法与机器学习(ML)相结合的混合模型有效地缓解这些差异。采用人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)和光梯度增强机(LGBM)三种机器学习方法,结合Penman Monteith (PM)和地表能量平衡(SEB)算法,建立了ML_PM和ML_SEB两个混合模型,并对中国2001 - 2022年的ET进行了模拟。混合模型ML_PM和ML_SEB分别用ML代替了表面阻力(rs)和气动阻力(ra)的经验公式,考虑了能量平衡和湍流扩散过程。混合建模增强了物理过程的表示,同时保持了较高的估计精度。结果表明,混合模式ML_PM和ML_SEB显著提高了PM (NSE: 0.49)和SEB (NSE: - 0.53)的性能,NSE值分别超过0.8和0.6。特别是ML_PM,由于其更强的物理基础,整体表现与纯ML相当,并且在草地和森林生态系统中表现优于纯ML。此外,与纯ML相比,混合模型在稀疏采样和极端事件下表现出更强的鲁棒性和泛化性。最优混合模型(RF_PM)在2001-2022年间为中国产生了580.33±9.01 mm yr - 1的年平均ET,其增加趋势(0.52 mm yr - 2, p >;0.05)。总体而言,混合模式实现了物理机制和估算精度之间的最佳平衡,为蒸散发估算提供了新的视角,增强了我们对气候变化下区域和全球尺度水文过程的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physics-constrained machine learning for satellite-derived evapotranspiration in China
Evapotranspiration estimates for China derived from empirical and physical models exhibit limited agreement in magnitude and trends, due to the complexity of surface characteristics and climatic conditions. Advances in knowledge-guided data-driven methods allow hybrid models that integrate remote sensing-based ET algorithms with machine learning (ML) to mitigate these discrepancies effectively. We developed two hybrid models, ML_PM and ML_SEB, by coupling the Penman Monteith (PM) and surface energy balance (SEB) algorithm with three ML methods: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and then simulated China’s ET from 2001 to 2022. The hybrid models ML_PM, ML_SEB, replaced empirical formulas of the critical but uncertain parameters: surface resistance (rs) and aerodynamic resistance (ra) with ML, respectively, considering energy balance and turbulent diffusion processes. Hybrid modeling enhanced the representation of physical processes while preserving high estimation accuracy. We evaluated the hybrid models using 63 eddy covariance (EC) sites across China and compared them with process-based physical models and pure ML. Results indicated that the hybrid models ML_PM and ML_SEB substantially improved the performance of the PM (NSE: 0.49) and SEB (NSE: −0.53), achieving NSE values of over 0.8 and 0.6, respectively. ML_PM, in particular, performed on par with pure ML overall and outperformed them for grassland and forest ecosystems, owing to its stronger physical foundation. Moreover, the hybrid models demonstrated greater robustness and generalization under sparse sampling and extreme events compared to pure ML. The optimal hybrid model (RF_PM) produced an annual mean ET of 580.33 ± 9.01 mm yr−1 for China over 2001–2022, with a statistically insignificant increasing trend (0.52 mm yr−2, p > 0.05). Overall, hybrid modeling achieved an optimal balance between physical mechanism and estimation accuracy, offering a new perspective for ET estimation and enhancing our understanding of hydrological processes at regional and global scales under climate change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信