Xin Zhou , Jinfei Wang , Bo Shan , Yongjun He , Minfeng Xing
{"title":"农区多频多极化SAR对不同深度土壤水分的敏感性","authors":"Xin Zhou , Jinfei Wang , Bo Shan , Yongjun He , Minfeng Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil moisture is critical for various agricultural applications such as crop monitoring and irrigation management. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), especially at L-band and C-band frequencies, has been widely utilized for soil moisture estimation across different polarizations. However, the ambiguity in the depth of soil moisture retrieval remains a challenge due to the complex interactions between SAR signals and ground targets. In this study, the sensitivity of multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR to soil moisture retrieval at various depths was quantitatively analysed. First, using the Dobson semi-empirical dielectric mixing model, the penetration depth of C-band SAR was found to be limited to the top surface soil (0–5 cm), while L-band SAR could penetrate from 3 cm to more than 20 cm depending on soil properties. Next, the accuracy of soil moisture retrieved at five depths (0–5 cm, 5 cm, 20 cm, 50 cm, and 100 cm) was evaluated using in-situ soil moisture data. Using Random Forest (RF) regression and polarimetric features, the volume scattering of C-band SAR was demonstrated as the dominant scattering mechanism, leading to reduced accuracy across all depths. In contrast, L-band SAR achieved the highest accuracy at the 5 cm depth, constrained by the limited intervals of moisture measurements. Furthermore, the analysis of incidence angle and vegetation coverage revealed that lower incidence angles (15–45 degrees) and lower vegetation conditions improved the accuracy for C-band SAR. L-band SAR, however, exhibited less sensitivity to vegetation coverage when retrieving soil moisture from shallower depths. These findings provide valuable insights for selecting SAR data suitable for soil moisture retrieval in agricultural regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"660 ","pages":"Article 133513"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity of multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR to soil moisture at different depths in agricultural regions\",\"authors\":\"Xin Zhou , Jinfei Wang , Bo Shan , Yongjun He , Minfeng Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Soil moisture is critical for various agricultural applications such as crop monitoring and irrigation management. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), especially at L-band and C-band frequencies, has been widely utilized for soil moisture estimation across different polarizations. However, the ambiguity in the depth of soil moisture retrieval remains a challenge due to the complex interactions between SAR signals and ground targets. In this study, the sensitivity of multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR to soil moisture retrieval at various depths was quantitatively analysed. First, using the Dobson semi-empirical dielectric mixing model, the penetration depth of C-band SAR was found to be limited to the top surface soil (0–5 cm), while L-band SAR could penetrate from 3 cm to more than 20 cm depending on soil properties. Next, the accuracy of soil moisture retrieved at five depths (0–5 cm, 5 cm, 20 cm, 50 cm, and 100 cm) was evaluated using in-situ soil moisture data. Using Random Forest (RF) regression and polarimetric features, the volume scattering of C-band SAR was demonstrated as the dominant scattering mechanism, leading to reduced accuracy across all depths. In contrast, L-band SAR achieved the highest accuracy at the 5 cm depth, constrained by the limited intervals of moisture measurements. Furthermore, the analysis of incidence angle and vegetation coverage revealed that lower incidence angles (15–45 degrees) and lower vegetation conditions improved the accuracy for C-band SAR. L-band SAR, however, exhibited less sensitivity to vegetation coverage when retrieving soil moisture from shallower depths. These findings provide valuable insights for selecting SAR data suitable for soil moisture retrieval in agricultural regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"660 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425008510\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425008510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sensitivity of multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR to soil moisture at different depths in agricultural regions
Soil moisture is critical for various agricultural applications such as crop monitoring and irrigation management. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), especially at L-band and C-band frequencies, has been widely utilized for soil moisture estimation across different polarizations. However, the ambiguity in the depth of soil moisture retrieval remains a challenge due to the complex interactions between SAR signals and ground targets. In this study, the sensitivity of multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR to soil moisture retrieval at various depths was quantitatively analysed. First, using the Dobson semi-empirical dielectric mixing model, the penetration depth of C-band SAR was found to be limited to the top surface soil (0–5 cm), while L-band SAR could penetrate from 3 cm to more than 20 cm depending on soil properties. Next, the accuracy of soil moisture retrieved at five depths (0–5 cm, 5 cm, 20 cm, 50 cm, and 100 cm) was evaluated using in-situ soil moisture data. Using Random Forest (RF) regression and polarimetric features, the volume scattering of C-band SAR was demonstrated as the dominant scattering mechanism, leading to reduced accuracy across all depths. In contrast, L-band SAR achieved the highest accuracy at the 5 cm depth, constrained by the limited intervals of moisture measurements. Furthermore, the analysis of incidence angle and vegetation coverage revealed that lower incidence angles (15–45 degrees) and lower vegetation conditions improved the accuracy for C-band SAR. L-band SAR, however, exhibited less sensitivity to vegetation coverage when retrieving soil moisture from shallower depths. These findings provide valuable insights for selecting SAR data suitable for soil moisture retrieval in agricultural regions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.