Markus W.H. Spitzer , Younes Strittmatter , Melvin Marti , Aki Schumacher , Lisa Bardach
{"title":"好奇心压倒了认知努力回避倾向","authors":"Markus W.H. Spitzer , Younes Strittmatter , Melvin Marti , Aki Schumacher , Lisa Bardach","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Curiosity has been described as a desire to learn new information, and previous studies have demonstrated that curiosity drives peoples’ decision to invest resources (e.g., time or tokens) to find out answers. It is commonly assumed that curiosity should also prompt people to invest more effort until they attain unknown answers. However, experimental evidence is lacking on whether people would be willing to exert cognitive effort — in addition to time investments — to find out answers. In three pre-registered experiments, we first asked participants to rate a set of 20 trivia questions regarding their curiosity about knowing the answers. Subsequently, participants had to perform a set of random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) to view the answer to each trivia question. We varied the motion coherence of the RDKs as a proxy for cognitive effort demands and tested whether curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies. Our results provide converging evidence that curiosity outweighs peoples’ tendencies to avoid cognitive effort. That is, participants avoided high-effort RDKs if they were not curious about information and when the exertion of cognitive effort did not affect the attainment of information. However, if participants were curious about questions and if no alternative low-effort option was available, they were willing to employ cognitive effort to find out answers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"262 ","pages":"Article 106167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies\",\"authors\":\"Markus W.H. Spitzer , Younes Strittmatter , Melvin Marti , Aki Schumacher , Lisa Bardach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Curiosity has been described as a desire to learn new information, and previous studies have demonstrated that curiosity drives peoples’ decision to invest resources (e.g., time or tokens) to find out answers. It is commonly assumed that curiosity should also prompt people to invest more effort until they attain unknown answers. However, experimental evidence is lacking on whether people would be willing to exert cognitive effort — in addition to time investments — to find out answers. In three pre-registered experiments, we first asked participants to rate a set of 20 trivia questions regarding their curiosity about knowing the answers. Subsequently, participants had to perform a set of random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) to view the answer to each trivia question. We varied the motion coherence of the RDKs as a proxy for cognitive effort demands and tested whether curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies. Our results provide converging evidence that curiosity outweighs peoples’ tendencies to avoid cognitive effort. That is, participants avoided high-effort RDKs if they were not curious about information and when the exertion of cognitive effort did not affect the attainment of information. However, if participants were curious about questions and if no alternative low-effort option was available, they were willing to employ cognitive effort to find out answers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition\",\"volume\":\"262 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725001076\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725001076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Curiosity has been described as a desire to learn new information, and previous studies have demonstrated that curiosity drives peoples’ decision to invest resources (e.g., time or tokens) to find out answers. It is commonly assumed that curiosity should also prompt people to invest more effort until they attain unknown answers. However, experimental evidence is lacking on whether people would be willing to exert cognitive effort — in addition to time investments — to find out answers. In three pre-registered experiments, we first asked participants to rate a set of 20 trivia questions regarding their curiosity about knowing the answers. Subsequently, participants had to perform a set of random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) to view the answer to each trivia question. We varied the motion coherence of the RDKs as a proxy for cognitive effort demands and tested whether curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies. Our results provide converging evidence that curiosity outweighs peoples’ tendencies to avoid cognitive effort. That is, participants avoided high-effort RDKs if they were not curious about information and when the exertion of cognitive effort did not affect the attainment of information. However, if participants were curious about questions and if no alternative low-effort option was available, they were willing to employ cognitive effort to find out answers.
期刊介绍:
Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.