好奇心压倒了认知努力回避倾向

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Markus W.H. Spitzer , Younes Strittmatter , Melvin Marti , Aki Schumacher , Lisa Bardach
{"title":"好奇心压倒了认知努力回避倾向","authors":"Markus W.H. Spitzer ,&nbsp;Younes Strittmatter ,&nbsp;Melvin Marti ,&nbsp;Aki Schumacher ,&nbsp;Lisa Bardach","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Curiosity has been described as a desire to learn new information, and previous studies have demonstrated that curiosity drives peoples’ decision to invest resources (e.g., time or tokens) to find out answers. It is commonly assumed that curiosity should also prompt people to invest more effort until they attain unknown answers. However, experimental evidence is lacking on whether people would be willing to exert cognitive effort — in addition to time investments — to find out answers. In three pre-registered experiments, we first asked participants to rate a set of 20 trivia questions regarding their curiosity about knowing the answers. Subsequently, participants had to perform a set of random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) to view the answer to each trivia question. We varied the motion coherence of the RDKs as a proxy for cognitive effort demands and tested whether curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies. Our results provide converging evidence that curiosity outweighs peoples’ tendencies to avoid cognitive effort. That is, participants avoided high-effort RDKs if they were not curious about information and when the exertion of cognitive effort did not affect the attainment of information. However, if participants were curious about questions and if no alternative low-effort option was available, they were willing to employ cognitive effort to find out answers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"262 ","pages":"Article 106167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies\",\"authors\":\"Markus W.H. Spitzer ,&nbsp;Younes Strittmatter ,&nbsp;Melvin Marti ,&nbsp;Aki Schumacher ,&nbsp;Lisa Bardach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Curiosity has been described as a desire to learn new information, and previous studies have demonstrated that curiosity drives peoples’ decision to invest resources (e.g., time or tokens) to find out answers. It is commonly assumed that curiosity should also prompt people to invest more effort until they attain unknown answers. However, experimental evidence is lacking on whether people would be willing to exert cognitive effort — in addition to time investments — to find out answers. In three pre-registered experiments, we first asked participants to rate a set of 20 trivia questions regarding their curiosity about knowing the answers. Subsequently, participants had to perform a set of random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) to view the answer to each trivia question. We varied the motion coherence of the RDKs as a proxy for cognitive effort demands and tested whether curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies. Our results provide converging evidence that curiosity outweighs peoples’ tendencies to avoid cognitive effort. That is, participants avoided high-effort RDKs if they were not curious about information and when the exertion of cognitive effort did not affect the attainment of information. However, if participants were curious about questions and if no alternative low-effort option was available, they were willing to employ cognitive effort to find out answers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition\",\"volume\":\"262 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725001076\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725001076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

好奇心被描述为一种学习新信息的欲望,以前的研究表明,好奇心驱使人们决定投入资源(如时间或代币)来寻找答案。人们通常认为,好奇心也应该促使人们投入更多的努力,直到他们获得未知的答案。然而,缺乏实验证据表明,除了时间投入之外,人们是否愿意付出认知努力来寻找答案。在三个预先注册的实验中,我们首先要求参与者对一组20个琐事问题进行评分,以了解他们对知道答案的好奇心。随后,参与者必须执行一组随机点运动学图(rdk)来查看每个琐事问题的答案。我们改变了rdk的运动一致性作为认知努力需求的代理,并测试了好奇心是否胜过认知努力回避倾向。我们的研究结果提供了一致的证据,表明好奇心超过了人们避免认知努力的倾向。也就是说,如果参与者对信息不好奇,并且认知努力的发挥不影响信息的获得,他们就会避免高努力的rdk。然而,如果参与者对问题感到好奇,如果没有其他低成本的选择,他们愿意使用认知努力来找到答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies
Curiosity has been described as a desire to learn new information, and previous studies have demonstrated that curiosity drives peoples’ decision to invest resources (e.g., time or tokens) to find out answers. It is commonly assumed that curiosity should also prompt people to invest more effort until they attain unknown answers. However, experimental evidence is lacking on whether people would be willing to exert cognitive effort — in addition to time investments — to find out answers. In three pre-registered experiments, we first asked participants to rate a set of 20 trivia questions regarding their curiosity about knowing the answers. Subsequently, participants had to perform a set of random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) to view the answer to each trivia question. We varied the motion coherence of the RDKs as a proxy for cognitive effort demands and tested whether curiosity overpowers cognitive effort avoidance tendencies. Our results provide converging evidence that curiosity outweighs peoples’ tendencies to avoid cognitive effort. That is, participants avoided high-effort RDKs if they were not curious about information and when the exertion of cognitive effort did not affect the attainment of information. However, if participants were curious about questions and if no alternative low-effort option was available, they were willing to employ cognitive effort to find out answers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信