关节踝关节-足矫形器背屈运动范围对中风后个体步态中下肢关节运动学的影响

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Yufan He , Mark W.P. Koh , Chloe L.Y. Wong , Fan Gao , Toshiki Kobayashi
{"title":"关节踝关节-足矫形器背屈运动范围对中风后个体步态中下肢关节运动学的影响","authors":"Yufan He ,&nbsp;Mark W.P. Koh ,&nbsp;Chloe L.Y. Wong ,&nbsp;Fan Gao ,&nbsp;Toshiki Kobayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adjusting the range of motion (ROM) and spring stiffness of ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs) for individuals post-stroke enables customized functionality and targeted support during specific phases of the gait cycle. Modifications to dorsiflexion ROM or spring stiffness theoretically influences the second and third rockers of gait. Understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing gait in individuals post-stroke. This study investigated the impact of dorsiflexion ROM adjustments in multi-function articulated AFOs on ankle, knee, and hip kinematics during gait in individuals post-stroke. Nine participants were tested across six AFO settings, including three dorsiflexion ROM levels (0°, 5°, 10°) with two spring stiffness levels (low stiffness = 200 N/mm, high stiffness = 515 N/mm) of the Triple Action ankle joint. Kinematic data were collected using a 3D motion capture system, and joint angle parameters were analyzed throughout the gait cycle. The results showed that increasing dorsiflexion ROM significantly increased the maximum dorsiflexion angle of the ankle and decreased the maximum extension angle of the knee, with no significant effects on hip joint kinematics or walking speed. Increased ankle dorsiflexion facilitates tibial progression during the second rocker of gait, enhancing walking efficiency. However, the decrease in knee extension angle or increase in knee flexion angle may pose challenges to knee stability. This study suggests that dorsiflexion ROM of articulated AFOs should be tailored: individuals with stable knee joints may benefit from increased dorsiflexion ROM to optimize the second rocker, while those with unstable knees may require reduced dorsiflexion ROM to enhance stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 112755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of articulated ankle–foot orthosis dorsiflexion range of motion on lower-limb joint kinematics during gait in individuals post-stroke\",\"authors\":\"Yufan He ,&nbsp;Mark W.P. Koh ,&nbsp;Chloe L.Y. Wong ,&nbsp;Fan Gao ,&nbsp;Toshiki Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Adjusting the range of motion (ROM) and spring stiffness of ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs) for individuals post-stroke enables customized functionality and targeted support during specific phases of the gait cycle. Modifications to dorsiflexion ROM or spring stiffness theoretically influences the second and third rockers of gait. Understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing gait in individuals post-stroke. This study investigated the impact of dorsiflexion ROM adjustments in multi-function articulated AFOs on ankle, knee, and hip kinematics during gait in individuals post-stroke. Nine participants were tested across six AFO settings, including three dorsiflexion ROM levels (0°, 5°, 10°) with two spring stiffness levels (low stiffness = 200 N/mm, high stiffness = 515 N/mm) of the Triple Action ankle joint. Kinematic data were collected using a 3D motion capture system, and joint angle parameters were analyzed throughout the gait cycle. The results showed that increasing dorsiflexion ROM significantly increased the maximum dorsiflexion angle of the ankle and decreased the maximum extension angle of the knee, with no significant effects on hip joint kinematics or walking speed. Increased ankle dorsiflexion facilitates tibial progression during the second rocker of gait, enhancing walking efficiency. However, the decrease in knee extension angle or increase in knee flexion angle may pose challenges to knee stability. This study suggests that dorsiflexion ROM of articulated AFOs should be tailored: individuals with stable knee joints may benefit from increased dorsiflexion ROM to optimize the second rocker, while those with unstable knees may require reduced dorsiflexion ROM to enhance stability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025002672\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025002672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调整运动范围(ROM)和踝关节-足矫形器(AFOs)的弹簧刚度为中风后的个人提供定制的功能和在步态周期的特定阶段有针对性的支持。对背屈ROM或弹簧刚度的修改理论上影响步态的第二和第三摇杆。了解这些影响对于优化中风后个体的步态至关重要。本研究调查了多功能关节afo的背屈ROM调整对中风后个体步态中踝关节、膝关节和髋关节运动学的影响。九名参与者在六种AFO设置下进行了测试,包括三种踝关节背屈度(0°,5°,10°)和两种弹簧刚度水平(低刚度= 200 N/mm,高刚度= 515 N/mm)。使用三维运动捕捉系统收集运动学数据,并分析整个步态周期的关节角度参数。结果表明,增加背屈度ROM可显著增加踝关节最大背屈角,降低膝关节最大伸角,但对髋关节运动学和步行速度无显著影响。增加踝关节背屈有助于在步态的第二个摇臂胫骨的进展,提高步行效率。然而,膝关节伸角的减小或膝关节屈曲角的增大会对膝关节的稳定性带来挑战。本研究表明,关节式afo的背屈活动度应量身定制:膝关节稳定的个体可能受益于增加背屈活动度以优化第二摇杆,而膝关节不稳定的患者可能需要减少背屈活动度以增强稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of articulated ankle–foot orthosis dorsiflexion range of motion on lower-limb joint kinematics during gait in individuals post-stroke
Adjusting the range of motion (ROM) and spring stiffness of ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs) for individuals post-stroke enables customized functionality and targeted support during specific phases of the gait cycle. Modifications to dorsiflexion ROM or spring stiffness theoretically influences the second and third rockers of gait. Understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing gait in individuals post-stroke. This study investigated the impact of dorsiflexion ROM adjustments in multi-function articulated AFOs on ankle, knee, and hip kinematics during gait in individuals post-stroke. Nine participants were tested across six AFO settings, including three dorsiflexion ROM levels (0°, 5°, 10°) with two spring stiffness levels (low stiffness = 200 N/mm, high stiffness = 515 N/mm) of the Triple Action ankle joint. Kinematic data were collected using a 3D motion capture system, and joint angle parameters were analyzed throughout the gait cycle. The results showed that increasing dorsiflexion ROM significantly increased the maximum dorsiflexion angle of the ankle and decreased the maximum extension angle of the knee, with no significant effects on hip joint kinematics or walking speed. Increased ankle dorsiflexion facilitates tibial progression during the second rocker of gait, enhancing walking efficiency. However, the decrease in knee extension angle or increase in knee flexion angle may pose challenges to knee stability. This study suggests that dorsiflexion ROM of articulated AFOs should be tailored: individuals with stable knee joints may benefit from increased dorsiflexion ROM to optimize the second rocker, while those with unstable knees may require reduced dorsiflexion ROM to enhance stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信