絮凝剂对含残余泡沫的EPB废渣原位回收潜力的影响

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yao Lu , Ming Huang , Jim S. Shiau , Fengwen Lai , Liqian Peng
{"title":"絮凝剂对含残余泡沫的EPB废渣原位回收潜力的影响","authors":"Yao Lu ,&nbsp;Ming Huang ,&nbsp;Jim S. Shiau ,&nbsp;Fengwen Lai ,&nbsp;Liqian Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The in–situ recycling technique offers a promising solution for the efficient management of the escalating volumes of waste muck or slurry generated during shield tunneling. While foam is extensively utilized for soil conditioning in earth pressure balance (EPB) tunneling, the effects of organic and inorganic flocculants on the in–situ recycling potential of waste EPB shield muck containing residual foams remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, laboratory experiments were conducted using four flocculants: cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), nonionic polyacrylamide (NPAM), anionic polyacrylamide (APAM), and polyaluminum chloride (PACL), with an enhanced flocculation and press–filtration apparatus. The defoaming–flocculation–dewatering behavior of waste EPB shield muck was systematically investigated by evaluating key parameters, including residual foam height, defoaming ratio, antifoaming ratio, total suspended solids, turbidity, moisture content, and zeta potential, while accounting for both muck dry mass and fines content. Moreover, the microscopic structure of flocculates and filter cakes was characterized using nanoparticle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy. The experimental results reveal that CPAM exhibits constrained flocculation and dewatering efficiency, primarily attributed to diminished charge neutralization resulting from residual anionic surfactants. In contrast, PACL demonstrates superior dewatering performance compared to NPAM and APAM, but exhibits the lowest flocculation and foam–suppression efficiency. Additionally, a consistent linear negative correlation is identified between the flocculation and dewatering indices of EPB shield muck, independent of the flocculant type, whether organic or inorganic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"65 3","pages":"Article 101625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of flocculants on in–situ recycling potential of waste EPB shield muck with residual foams\",\"authors\":\"Yao Lu ,&nbsp;Ming Huang ,&nbsp;Jim S. Shiau ,&nbsp;Fengwen Lai ,&nbsp;Liqian Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The in–situ recycling technique offers a promising solution for the efficient management of the escalating volumes of waste muck or slurry generated during shield tunneling. While foam is extensively utilized for soil conditioning in earth pressure balance (EPB) tunneling, the effects of organic and inorganic flocculants on the in–situ recycling potential of waste EPB shield muck containing residual foams remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, laboratory experiments were conducted using four flocculants: cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), nonionic polyacrylamide (NPAM), anionic polyacrylamide (APAM), and polyaluminum chloride (PACL), with an enhanced flocculation and press–filtration apparatus. The defoaming–flocculation–dewatering behavior of waste EPB shield muck was systematically investigated by evaluating key parameters, including residual foam height, defoaming ratio, antifoaming ratio, total suspended solids, turbidity, moisture content, and zeta potential, while accounting for both muck dry mass and fines content. Moreover, the microscopic structure of flocculates and filter cakes was characterized using nanoparticle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy. The experimental results reveal that CPAM exhibits constrained flocculation and dewatering efficiency, primarily attributed to diminished charge neutralization resulting from residual anionic surfactants. In contrast, PACL demonstrates superior dewatering performance compared to NPAM and APAM, but exhibits the lowest flocculation and foam–suppression efficiency. Additionally, a consistent linear negative correlation is identified between the flocculation and dewatering indices of EPB shield muck, independent of the flocculant type, whether organic or inorganic.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625000599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080625000599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

就地回收技术为有效管理盾构隧道施工过程中产生的不断增加的废渣或泥浆量提供了一个很有前途的解决方案。虽然泡沫被广泛用于土压平衡(EPB)隧道的土壤调节,但有机和无机絮凝剂对含残余泡沫的EPB盾构垃圾原位回收潜力的影响尚未得到充分研究。为了弥补这一空白,利用阳离子聚丙烯酰胺(CPAM)、非离子聚丙烯酰胺(NPAM)、阴离子聚丙烯酰胺(APAM)和聚氯化铝(PACL)四种絮凝剂进行了实验室实验,并采用了增强絮凝和压滤装置。在兼顾渣土干质量和细粒含量的前提下,通过评价残余泡沫高度、消泡比、消泡比、总悬浮物、浊度、含水率、zeta电位等关键参数,系统研究了EPB盾构渣土的消泡-絮凝-脱水行为。利用纳米粒度分析和扫描电镜对絮凝剂和滤饼的微观结构进行了表征。实验结果表明,CPAM表现出有限的絮凝和脱水效率,主要是由于残留的阴离子表面活性剂减少了电荷中和作用。PACL的脱水性能优于NPAM和APAM,但絮凝抑泡效果较差。此外,EPB屏蔽渣的絮凝与脱水指标之间存在线性负相关关系,与絮凝剂类型(有机或无机)无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of flocculants on in–situ recycling potential of waste EPB shield muck with residual foams
The in–situ recycling technique offers a promising solution for the efficient management of the escalating volumes of waste muck or slurry generated during shield tunneling. While foam is extensively utilized for soil conditioning in earth pressure balance (EPB) tunneling, the effects of organic and inorganic flocculants on the in–situ recycling potential of waste EPB shield muck containing residual foams remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, laboratory experiments were conducted using four flocculants: cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), nonionic polyacrylamide (NPAM), anionic polyacrylamide (APAM), and polyaluminum chloride (PACL), with an enhanced flocculation and press–filtration apparatus. The defoaming–flocculation–dewatering behavior of waste EPB shield muck was systematically investigated by evaluating key parameters, including residual foam height, defoaming ratio, antifoaming ratio, total suspended solids, turbidity, moisture content, and zeta potential, while accounting for both muck dry mass and fines content. Moreover, the microscopic structure of flocculates and filter cakes was characterized using nanoparticle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy. The experimental results reveal that CPAM exhibits constrained flocculation and dewatering efficiency, primarily attributed to diminished charge neutralization resulting from residual anionic surfactants. In contrast, PACL demonstrates superior dewatering performance compared to NPAM and APAM, but exhibits the lowest flocculation and foam–suppression efficiency. Additionally, a consistent linear negative correlation is identified between the flocculation and dewatering indices of EPB shield muck, independent of the flocculant type, whether organic or inorganic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信