{"title":"施用尿素和石灰对道格拉斯冷杉林强化有机质去除和植被控制后土壤养分动态的影响","authors":"K.M. Littke , S.M. Holub , W.R. Littke , E.C. Turnblom","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Fall River Long-Term Soil Productivity site in coastal WA, USA, examines the long-term effects of organic matter removal and vegetation control on Douglas-fir (<em>Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii</em> (Mirbel) Franco) productivity. Treatments included bole-only (BO), whole-tree (WT), and whole-tree with coarse woody debris removal (WT+), with either five years of complete vegetation control (V: BOV, WTV, WT+V) or only initial control (BO). Previous studies showed that the Fall River soil initially contained high total N and low base cations, and BOV, WTV, and WT+V treatments had reduced soil NO<sub>3</sub>, Ca, K, and Mg availability after 18 years. This study tested whether urea fertilization or liming could restore nutrient losses using soil extractions and Plant Root Simulator (PRS) probes over 2 and 5 years. Urea fertilization quickly increased NO<sub>3</sub> availability down to 50 cm, though WT+V plots responded the least. Urea also boosted PRS Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu initially but subsequently reduced PRS Ca and Mg supply rates and soil pH. Liming raised exchangeable Ca and PRS Ca in the forest floor and shallow soil, but not at 20–50 cm where WT+V had the lowest Ca levels. While this study used non-operational vegetation control and organic matter removals, it underscores the role of understory vegetation and harvest residues in retaining soil nutrients and the potential for fertilizers to ameliorate nutrient losses. This study also raises concerns about the effect of urea on base cation leaching in soils with high N and low base cations, which could explain the low observed fertilizer growth response in similar coastal soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"590 ","pages":"Article 122792"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of urea fertilization and liming on soil nutrient dynamics following intensive organic matter removal and vegetation control in a Douglas-fir forest\",\"authors\":\"K.M. Littke , S.M. Holub , W.R. Littke , E.C. Turnblom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Fall River Long-Term Soil Productivity site in coastal WA, USA, examines the long-term effects of organic matter removal and vegetation control on Douglas-fir (<em>Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii</em> (Mirbel) Franco) productivity. Treatments included bole-only (BO), whole-tree (WT), and whole-tree with coarse woody debris removal (WT+), with either five years of complete vegetation control (V: BOV, WTV, WT+V) or only initial control (BO). Previous studies showed that the Fall River soil initially contained high total N and low base cations, and BOV, WTV, and WT+V treatments had reduced soil NO<sub>3</sub>, Ca, K, and Mg availability after 18 years. This study tested whether urea fertilization or liming could restore nutrient losses using soil extractions and Plant Root Simulator (PRS) probes over 2 and 5 years. Urea fertilization quickly increased NO<sub>3</sub> availability down to 50 cm, though WT+V plots responded the least. Urea also boosted PRS Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu initially but subsequently reduced PRS Ca and Mg supply rates and soil pH. Liming raised exchangeable Ca and PRS Ca in the forest floor and shallow soil, but not at 20–50 cm where WT+V had the lowest Ca levels. While this study used non-operational vegetation control and organic matter removals, it underscores the role of understory vegetation and harvest residues in retaining soil nutrients and the potential for fertilizers to ameliorate nutrient losses. This study also raises concerns about the effect of urea on base cation leaching in soils with high N and low base cations, which could explain the low observed fertilizer growth response in similar coastal soils.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"590 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725003007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725003007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of urea fertilization and liming on soil nutrient dynamics following intensive organic matter removal and vegetation control in a Douglas-fir forest
The Fall River Long-Term Soil Productivity site in coastal WA, USA, examines the long-term effects of organic matter removal and vegetation control on Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirbel) Franco) productivity. Treatments included bole-only (BO), whole-tree (WT), and whole-tree with coarse woody debris removal (WT+), with either five years of complete vegetation control (V: BOV, WTV, WT+V) or only initial control (BO). Previous studies showed that the Fall River soil initially contained high total N and low base cations, and BOV, WTV, and WT+V treatments had reduced soil NO3, Ca, K, and Mg availability after 18 years. This study tested whether urea fertilization or liming could restore nutrient losses using soil extractions and Plant Root Simulator (PRS) probes over 2 and 5 years. Urea fertilization quickly increased NO3 availability down to 50 cm, though WT+V plots responded the least. Urea also boosted PRS Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu initially but subsequently reduced PRS Ca and Mg supply rates and soil pH. Liming raised exchangeable Ca and PRS Ca in the forest floor and shallow soil, but not at 20–50 cm where WT+V had the lowest Ca levels. While this study used non-operational vegetation control and organic matter removals, it underscores the role of understory vegetation and harvest residues in retaining soil nutrients and the potential for fertilizers to ameliorate nutrient losses. This study also raises concerns about the effect of urea on base cation leaching in soils with high N and low base cations, which could explain the low observed fertilizer growth response in similar coastal soils.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.