Andrew J. Martin , Rebecca J. Collie , Roger Kennett , Danny Liu , Paul Ginns , Lala B. Sudimantara , Ema W. Dewi , Lilith G. Rüschenpöhler
{"title":"将生成式AI与减负荷教学相结合,个性化优化学生学习","authors":"Andrew J. Martin , Rebecca J. Collie , Roger Kennett , Danny Liu , Paul Ginns , Lala B. Sudimantara , Ema W. Dewi , Lilith G. Rüschenpöhler","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is significantly influencing teaching and learning. The uptake of genAI in schools and universities/colleges has been rapid. But it has also been ad hoc and often ineffectively implemented, with little recognition of the need to manage cognitive burden to account for individual differences between novice and expert learners. Harnessing cognitive and instructional psychology principles, load reduction instruction (LRI) offers guidance for implementing genAI in ways that accommodate differences among novice and expert learners. LRI comprises five principles aimed at productively easing the cognitive burden on learners: (1) difficulty reduction as appropriate to prior learning, (2) support and scaffolding, (3) structured practice, (4) feedback-feedforward, and (5) independent practice and problem-solving. We suggest that the future of genAI-related learning can benefit from synthesizing genAI implementation with the core principles underpinning LRI to effectively manage the cognitive burden on diverse students as they engage with genAI to learn.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102723"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating generative AI and load reduction instruction to individualize and optimize students' learning\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Martin , Rebecca J. Collie , Roger Kennett , Danny Liu , Paul Ginns , Lala B. Sudimantara , Ema W. Dewi , Lilith G. Rüschenpöhler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is significantly influencing teaching and learning. The uptake of genAI in schools and universities/colleges has been rapid. But it has also been ad hoc and often ineffectively implemented, with little recognition of the need to manage cognitive burden to account for individual differences between novice and expert learners. Harnessing cognitive and instructional psychology principles, load reduction instruction (LRI) offers guidance for implementing genAI in ways that accommodate differences among novice and expert learners. LRI comprises five principles aimed at productively easing the cognitive burden on learners: (1) difficulty reduction as appropriate to prior learning, (2) support and scaffolding, (3) structured practice, (4) feedback-feedforward, and (5) independent practice and problem-solving. We suggest that the future of genAI-related learning can benefit from synthesizing genAI implementation with the core principles underpinning LRI to effectively manage the cognitive burden on diverse students as they engage with genAI to learn.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrating generative AI and load reduction instruction to individualize and optimize students' learning
Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is significantly influencing teaching and learning. The uptake of genAI in schools and universities/colleges has been rapid. But it has also been ad hoc and often ineffectively implemented, with little recognition of the need to manage cognitive burden to account for individual differences between novice and expert learners. Harnessing cognitive and instructional psychology principles, load reduction instruction (LRI) offers guidance for implementing genAI in ways that accommodate differences among novice and expert learners. LRI comprises five principles aimed at productively easing the cognitive burden on learners: (1) difficulty reduction as appropriate to prior learning, (2) support and scaffolding, (3) structured practice, (4) feedback-feedforward, and (5) independent practice and problem-solving. We suggest that the future of genAI-related learning can benefit from synthesizing genAI implementation with the core principles underpinning LRI to effectively manage the cognitive burden on diverse students as they engage with genAI to learn.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).