Bailu Deng , Zhiyuan Li , Miao Sui , Jingren Zhou , Lamei Qing , Songlin Sun , Zheng Li , Qian Li , Yiwen Li , Wenwu Du
{"title":"如何在土地约束下构建社会生态一体化的绿地网络?以四川天府新区为例","authors":"Bailu Deng , Zhiyuan Li , Miao Sui , Jingren Zhou , Lamei Qing , Songlin Sun , Zheng Li , Qian Li , Yiwen Li , Wenwu Du","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maximizing the social-ecological benefits of urban green spaces with land constraints presents a challenge for cities facing high population density, farmland protection, and urban expanding. In this study, we develop an integrated ecological and social service framework (IESSF) to optimize green space networks. It comprehensively considers social and ecological benefits and innovatively establishes a cross-scale connectivity network, linking green spaces at both regional and urban scales to form a more cohesive network. First, we conduct an ecosystem service assessment based on the objective weighting method to evaluate the social-ecological service values of green spaces across the entire study area. Second, combining the assessment results with morphological analysis, we identify core green space patches and construct a regional scale green space network using Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) and the gravity model. Third, we assess urban green space services through ecosystem service evaluation, network analysis and the quantitative evaluation of route selection potential (QERSP), adding new parks and selecting recreational greenway routes. Finally, we construct a cross-scale connectivity network that links regional and urban green space networks, creating a more cohesive overall network. The results show that based on the IESSF method, the connectivity integration index (IIC) increased from 0.0091 to 0.1979, the Splitting index decreased from 1418.84 to 203.61, and the integrated increase in forest service coverage rate was 9.67%, which substantially improved the efficiency of social-ecological system services. This study provides an alternative way for cities facing similar land constraints in the post-urbanization era to develop an integrated green space network.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113576"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can a social-ecological integration green space network be developed with land constraints? A case study from Sichuan Tianfu New Area, China\",\"authors\":\"Bailu Deng , Zhiyuan Li , Miao Sui , Jingren Zhou , Lamei Qing , Songlin Sun , Zheng Li , Qian Li , Yiwen Li , Wenwu Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Maximizing the social-ecological benefits of urban green spaces with land constraints presents a challenge for cities facing high population density, farmland protection, and urban expanding. In this study, we develop an integrated ecological and social service framework (IESSF) to optimize green space networks. It comprehensively considers social and ecological benefits and innovatively establishes a cross-scale connectivity network, linking green spaces at both regional and urban scales to form a more cohesive network. First, we conduct an ecosystem service assessment based on the objective weighting method to evaluate the social-ecological service values of green spaces across the entire study area. Second, combining the assessment results with morphological analysis, we identify core green space patches and construct a regional scale green space network using Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) and the gravity model. Third, we assess urban green space services through ecosystem service evaluation, network analysis and the quantitative evaluation of route selection potential (QERSP), adding new parks and selecting recreational greenway routes. Finally, we construct a cross-scale connectivity network that links regional and urban green space networks, creating a more cohesive overall network. The results show that based on the IESSF method, the connectivity integration index (IIC) increased from 0.0091 to 0.1979, the Splitting index decreased from 1418.84 to 203.61, and the integrated increase in forest service coverage rate was 9.67%, which substantially improved the efficiency of social-ecological system services. This study provides an alternative way for cities facing similar land constraints in the post-urbanization era to develop an integrated green space network.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005060\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How can a social-ecological integration green space network be developed with land constraints? A case study from Sichuan Tianfu New Area, China
Maximizing the social-ecological benefits of urban green spaces with land constraints presents a challenge for cities facing high population density, farmland protection, and urban expanding. In this study, we develop an integrated ecological and social service framework (IESSF) to optimize green space networks. It comprehensively considers social and ecological benefits and innovatively establishes a cross-scale connectivity network, linking green spaces at both regional and urban scales to form a more cohesive network. First, we conduct an ecosystem service assessment based on the objective weighting method to evaluate the social-ecological service values of green spaces across the entire study area. Second, combining the assessment results with morphological analysis, we identify core green space patches and construct a regional scale green space network using Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) and the gravity model. Third, we assess urban green space services through ecosystem service evaluation, network analysis and the quantitative evaluation of route selection potential (QERSP), adding new parks and selecting recreational greenway routes. Finally, we construct a cross-scale connectivity network that links regional and urban green space networks, creating a more cohesive overall network. The results show that based on the IESSF method, the connectivity integration index (IIC) increased from 0.0091 to 0.1979, the Splitting index decreased from 1418.84 to 203.61, and the integrated increase in forest service coverage rate was 9.67%, which substantially improved the efficiency of social-ecological system services. This study provides an alternative way for cities facing similar land constraints in the post-urbanization era to develop an integrated green space network.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.