领域之间的相遇:在以色列COVID-19期间,将军事力量纳入卫生领域的流行病学工作

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Liron Inchi , Baruch Shimoni , Batia Madjar , Shiran Bord
{"title":"领域之间的相遇:在以色列COVID-19期间,将军事力量纳入卫生领域的流行病学工作","authors":"Liron Inchi ,&nbsp;Baruch Shimoni ,&nbsp;Batia Madjar ,&nbsp;Shiran Bord","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In July 2020, the government of Israel mandated cooperation between the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to address the COVID-19 crisis. Our research aims to reveal the consequences of this cooperation. We examine how the two organizations dealt with COVID-19 investigations and morbidity challenges. The article's theoretical framework is based on Pierre Bourdieu's theory of fields, showing the conflictual relations between the military and the civilian fields during COVID-19 efforts, as reflected in the relations between the IDF and the MOH. Twenty semi-constructed interviews were conducted with MOH and IDF personnel from February to May 2021. Results show cooperation alongside conflicts and demonstrate the military's extensive intrusion into a field outside its natural domain. The MOH acknowledged the potential benefit of the IDF's mobilization yet sensed that the IDF came to \"save the day\" while placing them in an inferior position. According to the IDF's interviewees, the MOH's \"professional approach\" often clashed with their action-based approach. In Bourdieu's terms, while the healthcare system can use human capital in its actions, the IDF system enjoys greater symbolic, social, cultural, and economic capital. This advantage in capital placed the two fields, MOH and IDF, in an unbalanced power relationship, explaining the IDF's taking over. We assumed that the securitization process of health services with alignment of expectations, division of authority, and open communication has the potential to help organizations better manage clashes in national and global crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"379 ","pages":"Article 118139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encounters between fields: Integrating military forces into the health field's epidemiological effort during COVID-19 in Israel\",\"authors\":\"Liron Inchi ,&nbsp;Baruch Shimoni ,&nbsp;Batia Madjar ,&nbsp;Shiran Bord\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In July 2020, the government of Israel mandated cooperation between the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to address the COVID-19 crisis. Our research aims to reveal the consequences of this cooperation. We examine how the two organizations dealt with COVID-19 investigations and morbidity challenges. The article's theoretical framework is based on Pierre Bourdieu's theory of fields, showing the conflictual relations between the military and the civilian fields during COVID-19 efforts, as reflected in the relations between the IDF and the MOH. Twenty semi-constructed interviews were conducted with MOH and IDF personnel from February to May 2021. Results show cooperation alongside conflicts and demonstrate the military's extensive intrusion into a field outside its natural domain. The MOH acknowledged the potential benefit of the IDF's mobilization yet sensed that the IDF came to \\\"save the day\\\" while placing them in an inferior position. According to the IDF's interviewees, the MOH's \\\"professional approach\\\" often clashed with their action-based approach. In Bourdieu's terms, while the healthcare system can use human capital in its actions, the IDF system enjoys greater symbolic, social, cultural, and economic capital. This advantage in capital placed the two fields, MOH and IDF, in an unbalanced power relationship, explaining the IDF's taking over. We assumed that the securitization process of health services with alignment of expectations, division of authority, and open communication has the potential to help organizations better manage clashes in national and global crises.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"379 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004691\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年7月,以色列政府授权卫生部(MOH)和以色列国防军(IDF)合作应对COVID-19危机。我们的研究旨在揭示这种合作的后果。我们将研究这两个组织如何应对COVID-19调查和发病率挑战。本文的理论框架以皮埃尔·布迪厄的场域理论为基础,展示了在COVID-19努力期间军事和民用领域的冲突关系,反映在以色列国防军与卫生部的关系上。从2021年2月至5月,对卫生部和以色列国防军人员进行了20次半构造访谈。结果显示了冲突中的合作,并显示了军队对其自然领域以外领域的广泛入侵。卫生部承认以色列国防军动员的潜在好处,但也意识到以色列国防军在将他们置于劣势的同时“拯救了一天”。根据以色列国防军的受访者,卫生部的“专业方法”经常与他们基于行动的方法发生冲突。用布迪厄的话来说,虽然医疗保健系统可以在其行动中使用人力资本,但IDF系统拥有更大的象征、社会、文化和经济资本。这种资本优势使卫生部和国防军这两个领域处于一种不平衡的权力关系中,这解释了国防军的接管。我们认为,卫生服务的证券化过程与期望、权力分工和公开沟通相一致,有可能帮助组织更好地管理国家和全球危机中的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Encounters between fields: Integrating military forces into the health field's epidemiological effort during COVID-19 in Israel
In July 2020, the government of Israel mandated cooperation between the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to address the COVID-19 crisis. Our research aims to reveal the consequences of this cooperation. We examine how the two organizations dealt with COVID-19 investigations and morbidity challenges. The article's theoretical framework is based on Pierre Bourdieu's theory of fields, showing the conflictual relations between the military and the civilian fields during COVID-19 efforts, as reflected in the relations between the IDF and the MOH. Twenty semi-constructed interviews were conducted with MOH and IDF personnel from February to May 2021. Results show cooperation alongside conflicts and demonstrate the military's extensive intrusion into a field outside its natural domain. The MOH acknowledged the potential benefit of the IDF's mobilization yet sensed that the IDF came to "save the day" while placing them in an inferior position. According to the IDF's interviewees, the MOH's "professional approach" often clashed with their action-based approach. In Bourdieu's terms, while the healthcare system can use human capital in its actions, the IDF system enjoys greater symbolic, social, cultural, and economic capital. This advantage in capital placed the two fields, MOH and IDF, in an unbalanced power relationship, explaining the IDF's taking over. We assumed that the securitization process of health services with alignment of expectations, division of authority, and open communication has the potential to help organizations better manage clashes in national and global crises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信