{"title":"支持向量机算法中元启发式优化与自动超参数调整方法在土壤水分特征曲线预测中的比较","authors":"Mostafa Rastgou, Yong He, Ruitao Lou, Qianjing Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimating the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) is essential for understanding soil behavior related in geological and geotechnical, and environmental engineering. This study was designed to evaluate and compare metaheuristic methods (cuckoo search optimization (CSO) and grey wolf optimization (GWO)) with automated methods (Bayesian optimization (BO) and grid search (GS)) for tuning hyperparameters (penalty coefficient (<em>C</em>), insensitive loss (<em>ε</em>), and kernel width (<em>γ</em>)) in support vector machines (SVM) to improve SWCC estimation. Four pedotransfer functions (PTFs) were derived to estimate the parameters of the Brutsaert model using various input variables such as sand, clay, and bulk density (BD), as well as moisture content at 33 (FC) and 1500 kPa (PWP) from 354 UNSODA soil samples. The findings of the testing phase indicated that the BO-based SVM algorithm outperformed other optimization methods with an average error value of 0.057 cm<sup>3</sup>cm<sup>−3</sup> for all PTFs. In PTF4 (sand+clay+BD + FC + PWP), BO demonstrated 6.23 %, 10.53 %, and 12.96%96 % higher reliability than CSO, GS, and GWO, respectively. The Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that <em>C</em> parameter had the highest impact on model reliability, while <em>ε</em> parameter had the lowest. Finally, the integration of BO into SVM can improve accuracy, efficiency, and robustness in SWCC estimation, providing more reliable predictions for future geotechnical and hydrological studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 108121"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of metaheuristic optimizations with automated hyperparameter tuning methods in support vector machines algorithm for predicting soil water characteristic curve\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Rastgou, Yong He, Ruitao Lou, Qianjing Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Estimating the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) is essential for understanding soil behavior related in geological and geotechnical, and environmental engineering. This study was designed to evaluate and compare metaheuristic methods (cuckoo search optimization (CSO) and grey wolf optimization (GWO)) with automated methods (Bayesian optimization (BO) and grid search (GS)) for tuning hyperparameters (penalty coefficient (<em>C</em>), insensitive loss (<em>ε</em>), and kernel width (<em>γ</em>)) in support vector machines (SVM) to improve SWCC estimation. Four pedotransfer functions (PTFs) were derived to estimate the parameters of the Brutsaert model using various input variables such as sand, clay, and bulk density (BD), as well as moisture content at 33 (FC) and 1500 kPa (PWP) from 354 UNSODA soil samples. The findings of the testing phase indicated that the BO-based SVM algorithm outperformed other optimization methods with an average error value of 0.057 cm<sup>3</sup>cm<sup>−3</sup> for all PTFs. In PTF4 (sand+clay+BD + FC + PWP), BO demonstrated 6.23 %, 10.53 %, and 12.96%96 % higher reliability than CSO, GS, and GWO, respectively. The Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that <em>C</em> parameter had the highest impact on model reliability, while <em>ε</em> parameter had the lowest. Finally, the integration of BO into SVM can improve accuracy, efficiency, and robustness in SWCC estimation, providing more reliable predictions for future geotechnical and hydrological studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Geology\",\"volume\":\"353 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225002170\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225002170","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
估算土壤水分特征曲线(SWCC)对于理解与地质、岩土和环境工程相关的土壤行为至关重要。本研究旨在评估和比较元启发性方法(杜鹃搜索优化(CSO)和灰狼优化(GWO))与自动化方法(贝叶斯优化(BO)和网格搜索(GS)),以调整支持向量机(SVM)中的超参数(惩罚系数(C),不敏感损失(ε)和核宽度(γ)),以改进SWCC估计。利用不同的输入变量,如砂、粘土、体积密度(BD),以及来自354个UNSODA土壤样品在33 (FC)和1500 kPa (PWP)下的水分含量,推导了四个土壤传递函数(ptf)来估计Brutsaert模型的参数。测试阶段的结果表明,基于bo的SVM算法对所有ptf的平均误差值为0.057 cm3cm−3,优于其他优化方法。在PTF4(砂+粘土+BD + FC + PWP)中,BO的可靠性分别比CSO、GS和GWO高6.23%、10.53%和12.96%。Shapley加性解释分析表明,C参数对模型可靠性的影响最大,ε参数对模型可靠性的影响最小。最后,将BO集成到SVM中可以提高SWCC估计的精度、效率和鲁棒性,为未来的岩土和水文研究提供更可靠的预测。
A comparison of metaheuristic optimizations with automated hyperparameter tuning methods in support vector machines algorithm for predicting soil water characteristic curve
Estimating the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) is essential for understanding soil behavior related in geological and geotechnical, and environmental engineering. This study was designed to evaluate and compare metaheuristic methods (cuckoo search optimization (CSO) and grey wolf optimization (GWO)) with automated methods (Bayesian optimization (BO) and grid search (GS)) for tuning hyperparameters (penalty coefficient (C), insensitive loss (ε), and kernel width (γ)) in support vector machines (SVM) to improve SWCC estimation. Four pedotransfer functions (PTFs) were derived to estimate the parameters of the Brutsaert model using various input variables such as sand, clay, and bulk density (BD), as well as moisture content at 33 (FC) and 1500 kPa (PWP) from 354 UNSODA soil samples. The findings of the testing phase indicated that the BO-based SVM algorithm outperformed other optimization methods with an average error value of 0.057 cm3cm−3 for all PTFs. In PTF4 (sand+clay+BD + FC + PWP), BO demonstrated 6.23 %, 10.53 %, and 12.96%96 % higher reliability than CSO, GS, and GWO, respectively. The Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that C parameter had the highest impact on model reliability, while ε parameter had the lowest. Finally, the integration of BO into SVM can improve accuracy, efficiency, and robustness in SWCC estimation, providing more reliable predictions for future geotechnical and hydrological studies.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.