Tomas Karlsson,Jenny Gustavsson,Katrin Wellfelt,Mattias Günther
{"title":"优化流量控制通气:I:E比和氧浓度对猪全气道阻塞模型的影响。","authors":"Tomas Karlsson,Jenny Gustavsson,Katrin Wellfelt,Mattias Günther","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPrehospital airway obstruction is a medical emergency requiring immediate intervention. When the insertion of a larger bore tube over an airway catheter is hindered by obstruction, flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) with expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) may offer a solution by allowing for ventilation through the airway catheter. This method uses a continuous bidirectional flow, necessitating a high-pressure gas source, typically 100% oxygen. However, in prehospital or military settings, oxygen supplies and exact manual control may be limited. Therefore, evaluating FCV/EVA without 100% oxygen, and with variable inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) control is essential to ensure its feasibility in such environments. We hypothesized that arterial oxygenation with 21% oxygen would be feasible and would vary between different I:E ratios.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this randomized crossover trial, FCV/EVA with different I:E ratios and fraction of inspired oxygen were compared in total airway obstruction. 15 crossbred male specific pathogen-free swine, mean (standard deviation [SD]) weight 56.6 (2.1) kg were divided into groups; method A (n = 9) and method B (n = 6), anesthetized, muscle relaxed and desaturated <80%. FCV/EVA was performed for 15 minutes through an airway catheter in the obstructed airway.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn I:E 1:1 vs 1:2 with 21% oxygen, the mean difference of Sao2 was 33.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3-51.4, P =.0020) and Pao2 was 4.7 kPa (95% CI, 1.3-8.1, P =.0127). Paco2 decreased more in 1:1 than 1:1 with a pause and 1:2. Paco2 remained <5 kPa with small variability in 1:1 with 21% oxygen.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFCV/EVA with 21% oxygen was feasible and maintained oxygenation and ventilation for 15 minutes. An I:E ratio of 1:1 was superior to 1:2. This approach may offer a viable alternative in a totally obstructed airway in resource-limited settings where higher oxygen concentrations are unavailable.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Flow-Controlled Ventilation: Impact of I:E Ratios and Oxygen Concentration in a Porcine Model of Total Airway Obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Tomas Karlsson,Jenny Gustavsson,Katrin Wellfelt,Mattias Günther\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ane.0000000000007583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPrehospital airway obstruction is a medical emergency requiring immediate intervention. When the insertion of a larger bore tube over an airway catheter is hindered by obstruction, flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) with expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) may offer a solution by allowing for ventilation through the airway catheter. This method uses a continuous bidirectional flow, necessitating a high-pressure gas source, typically 100% oxygen. However, in prehospital or military settings, oxygen supplies and exact manual control may be limited. Therefore, evaluating FCV/EVA without 100% oxygen, and with variable inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) control is essential to ensure its feasibility in such environments. We hypothesized that arterial oxygenation with 21% oxygen would be feasible and would vary between different I:E ratios.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nIn this randomized crossover trial, FCV/EVA with different I:E ratios and fraction of inspired oxygen were compared in total airway obstruction. 15 crossbred male specific pathogen-free swine, mean (standard deviation [SD]) weight 56.6 (2.1) kg were divided into groups; method A (n = 9) and method B (n = 6), anesthetized, muscle relaxed and desaturated <80%. FCV/EVA was performed for 15 minutes through an airway catheter in the obstructed airway.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nIn I:E 1:1 vs 1:2 with 21% oxygen, the mean difference of Sao2 was 33.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3-51.4, P =.0020) and Pao2 was 4.7 kPa (95% CI, 1.3-8.1, P =.0127). Paco2 decreased more in 1:1 than 1:1 with a pause and 1:2. Paco2 remained <5 kPa with small variability in 1:1 with 21% oxygen.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nFCV/EVA with 21% oxygen was feasible and maintained oxygenation and ventilation for 15 minutes. An I:E ratio of 1:1 was superior to 1:2. This approach may offer a viable alternative in a totally obstructed airway in resource-limited settings where higher oxygen concentrations are unavailable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
院前气道阻塞是一种需要立即干预的医疗紧急情况。当在气道导管上插入较大的内径管因阻塞而受阻时,流量控制通气(FCV)结合呼气通气辅助(EVA)可以通过气道导管进行通气,从而提供一种解决方案。该方法使用连续的双向流动,需要高压气源,通常为100%氧气。然而,在院前或军事环境中,氧气供应和精确的手动控制可能有限。因此,在无100%氧气和可变吸气呼气(I:E)控制下评估FCV/EVA对于确保其在这种环境下的可行性至关重要。我们假设21%氧的动脉氧合是可行的,并且在不同的I:E比之间会有所不同。方法在本随机交叉试验中,比较不同I:E比和吸入氧分数的FCV/EVA对全气道阻塞的影响。选择15头平均(标准差[SD])体重56.6 (2.1)kg的杂交雄性特异性无病原体猪,随机分组;方法A (n = 9)和方法B (n = 6)麻醉,肌肉松弛,去饱和度<80%。FCV/EVA通过气道导管在阻塞的气道内进行15分钟。结果在1:E 1:1 vs 1:2含氧量21%时,Sao2平均差值为33.8%(95%可信区间[CI], 16.3 ~ 51.4, P = 0.0020), Pao2平均差值为4.7 kPa (95% CI, 1.3 ~ 8.1, P = 0.0127)。Paco2在1:1时比1:1和1:2时减少得更多。当含氧量为21%时,Paco2仍< 5kpa,且变化较小。结论21%氧的sfcv /EVA是可行的,维持氧合通气15分钟。I:E比为1:1优于1:2。在资源有限的情况下,这种方法可能为完全阻塞的气道提供一种可行的替代方法,因为无法获得更高的氧气浓度。
Optimizing Flow-Controlled Ventilation: Impact of I:E Ratios and Oxygen Concentration in a Porcine Model of Total Airway Obstruction.
BACKGROUND
Prehospital airway obstruction is a medical emergency requiring immediate intervention. When the insertion of a larger bore tube over an airway catheter is hindered by obstruction, flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) with expiratory ventilation assistance (EVA) may offer a solution by allowing for ventilation through the airway catheter. This method uses a continuous bidirectional flow, necessitating a high-pressure gas source, typically 100% oxygen. However, in prehospital or military settings, oxygen supplies and exact manual control may be limited. Therefore, evaluating FCV/EVA without 100% oxygen, and with variable inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) control is essential to ensure its feasibility in such environments. We hypothesized that arterial oxygenation with 21% oxygen would be feasible and would vary between different I:E ratios.
METHODS
In this randomized crossover trial, FCV/EVA with different I:E ratios and fraction of inspired oxygen were compared in total airway obstruction. 15 crossbred male specific pathogen-free swine, mean (standard deviation [SD]) weight 56.6 (2.1) kg were divided into groups; method A (n = 9) and method B (n = 6), anesthetized, muscle relaxed and desaturated <80%. FCV/EVA was performed for 15 minutes through an airway catheter in the obstructed airway.
RESULTS
In I:E 1:1 vs 1:2 with 21% oxygen, the mean difference of Sao2 was 33.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3-51.4, P =.0020) and Pao2 was 4.7 kPa (95% CI, 1.3-8.1, P =.0127). Paco2 decreased more in 1:1 than 1:1 with a pause and 1:2. Paco2 remained <5 kPa with small variability in 1:1 with 21% oxygen.
CONCLUSIONS
FCV/EVA with 21% oxygen was feasible and maintained oxygenation and ventilation for 15 minutes. An I:E ratio of 1:1 was superior to 1:2. This approach may offer a viable alternative in a totally obstructed airway in resource-limited settings where higher oxygen concentrations are unavailable.