Megan M. Seeley, Benjamin C. Wiebe, Catherine A. Gehring, Kevin R. Hultine, Bradley C. Posch, Hillary F. Cooper, Elena A. Schaefer, Beatrice M. Bock, Andrew J. Abraham, Madeline E. Moran, Arthur Keith, Gerard J. Allan, Maya Scull, Thomas G. Whitham, Roberta M. Martin, Gregory P. Asner, Christopher E. Doughty
{"title":"遥感揭示了河岸杨树(Populus spp)对干旱响应的种间和种内变化","authors":"Megan M. Seeley, Benjamin C. Wiebe, Catherine A. Gehring, Kevin R. Hultine, Bradley C. Posch, Hillary F. Cooper, Elena A. Schaefer, Beatrice M. Bock, Andrew J. Abraham, Madeline E. Moran, Arthur Keith, Gerard J. Allan, Maya Scull, Thomas G. Whitham, Roberta M. Martin, Gregory P. Asner, Christopher E. Doughty","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>1 INTRODUCTION</h2>\n<p>Climate change exacerbates drought conditions in many regions (Dai, <span>2011</span>; Stocker et al., <span>2014</span>), increasing vegetation stress, plant mortality and biodiversity loss while disrupting critical mutualisms and ecosystem stability (Allen et al., <span>2010</span>; Au et al., <span>2023</span>; Steinkamp & Hickler, <span>2015</span>; Stone et al., <span>2018</span>). Prolonged and severe drought conditions threaten vital ecosystem services (Breshears et al., <span>2011</span>; Wolf & Paul-Limoges, <span>2023</span>), yet forests have demonstrated resilience and adaptive capacity to water stress (Amlin & Rood, <span>2003</span>; Anderegg et al., <span>2018</span>; Phelan et al., <span>2022</span>). This resilience can be driven by genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, as both intraspecific and interspecific variations shape ecosystem responses to drought (Anderegg et al., <span>2018</span>; Grossiord, <span>2020</span>; Rodríguez-Alarcón et al., <span>2022</span>). Remote sensing is a powerful, non-destructive tool for examining G × E interactions at multiple scales, capturing forest responses to water stress across species, populations and landscapes.</p>\n<p>Spectroscopy and thermal imaging are particularly effective for studying G × E interactions in the context of drought, as they capture physiological responses to water stress across spatial and temporal scales (Cotrozzi et al., <span>2017</span>; Le et al., <span>2023</span>; Li et al., <span>2023</span>; Sapes et al., <span>2024</span>). Spectroscopy, which captures data across the visible through shortwave infrared (VSWR; 350–2500 nm) spectrum at short wavelength intervals (e.g. 1–10 nm), allows us to detect changes in plant traits indicative of water stress (e.g. rehydration capacity, leaf water potential, relative water content, electrolyte leakage) before they are visually apparent (Cotrozzi et al., <span>2017</span>; Mohd Asaari et al., <span>2022</span>; Sapes et al., <span>2024</span>). Water stress, quantified as canopy water content, has been estimated across large spatial scales using imaging spectroscopy (Asner et al., <span>2016</span>). These data further capture changes in other leaf traits (e.g. leaf mass per area, chlorophyll content; Asner & Martin, <span>2016</span>), providing a non-destructive measure of plant phenotypes at both the leaf and landscape levels. While the entire VSWIR spectrum is used to capture plant physiological responses, specific regions contribute distinct information: the visible range (400–700 nm) largely reflects photosynthetic pigments like chlorophyll, the near-infrared (NIR; 750–1300 nm) detects variation in cell structure and water content, and the shortwave infrared (SWIR; 1300–2500 nm) is often indicative of non-photosynthetic plant traits such as lignins and tannins (Asner & Martin, <span>2016</span>). Furthermore, recent studies by Corbin et al. (<span>2025</span>) show that spectroscopy is adept at discriminating among populations and genotypes and detecting G × E interactions of <i>P. fremontii</i>, one of the species used in the present study. By detecting drought stress and phenotypic responses across environments, spectroscopy captures plant water-use strategies and adaptive capacities, forming a foundation to advance our understanding of local adaptations, community structure, phytochemistry and stress responses as well as for scaling these analyses to broader spatial extents through complementary remote sensing methods such as thermal imaging.</p>\n<p>Thermal imaging is another important remote sensing tool for investigating variation among water-use strategies, plant water status and drought tolerance at large spatial scales (Fuchs, <span>1990</span>; Scherrer et al., <span>2011</span>). Leaf and canopy temperatures, mediated by transpiration via evaporative cooling (latent heat loss), rise when water availability is limited, making thermal imaging a reliable indicator of water stress. This approach has been successfully applied in plant and ecosystem sciences using platforms such as towers, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and satellites (Farella et al., <span>2022</span>). By capturing G × E interactions at landscape scales, thermal imaging and spectroscopy offer a means of understanding ecosystem responses as climate change intensifies drought across many regions.</p>\n<p>Given the growing importance of understanding G × E interactions in the context of climate change, cottonwoods offer ideal case studies for investigating water stress in trees due to their significant intra- and interspecific variation, which mediates their response to environmental stressors (Blasini et al., <span>2021</span>, <span>2022</span>; Bothwell et al., <span>2023</span>; Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Kaluthota et al., <span>2015</span>; Moran et al., <span>2023</span>; Woolbright et al., <span>2008</span>). Two cottonwood species, (<i>Populus fremontii</i> Wats. and <i>P. angustifolia</i> James) and their naturally occurring hybrids coinhabit riparian zones throughout the southwestern U.S. but also differ in their hydraulic traits. <i>Populus fremontii</i> (Fremont cottonwood) has higher canopy conductance (Fischer et al., <span>2004</span>) and less stomatal sensitivity to cumulative vapour pressure deficit over the growing season than its sister species, <i>P. angustifolia</i> (narrowleaf cottonwood; Guo et al., <span>2022</span>). Further, hybrids between <i>P. fremontii</i> and <i>P. angustifolia</i> display distinct genetic and ecological characteristics, such as the formation of hybrid zones that consist of <i>F</i><sub>1</sub> hybrids and backcross genotypes with the potential for increased tolerance to drought (Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Martinsen et al., <span>2001</span>; Whitham et al., <span>1999</span>). Hybrids are of special interest as their unique genetic combinations (<i>F</i><sub>1</sub>s to backcrosses; Hersch-Green et al., <span>2014</span>) provide targets for selection and the potential for evolution in response to climate change (see review by Peñalba et al., <span>2024</span>). Drought resilience in both <i>Populus</i> species is a pressing conservation concern as they constitute foundation species (Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>) that have declined due, in part, to water limitations, leading to the decline of riparian ecosystems in the American southwest (Braatne et al., <span>1996</span>; Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Stromberg, <span>2001</span>; Stromberg et al., <span>1996</span>).</p>\n<p>Intraspecific differences—shaped largely by past climatic conditions—also play a key role in a species' ability to tolerate water stress (Gazol et al., <span>2023</span>; González de Andrés et al., <span>2021</span>; Jung et al., <span>2014</span>; Luo et al., <span>2023</span>). In <i>P. fremontii</i>, intraspecific variation is pronounced, with populations exhibiting distinct physiological adaptations to temperature and water availability, consistent with the recognition of distinct ecotypes across its range (Bothwell et al., <span>2023</span>; Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Ikeda et al., <span>2017</span>). For example, warm-adapted <i>P. fremontii</i> populations use high transpiration rates during heat waves to keep leaf temperatures below thermal thresholds (Blasini et al., <span>2021</span>; Moran et al., <span>2023</span>; Posch et al., <span>2024</span>). However, this greater capacity for leaf cooling comes at the cost of operating closer to hydraulic failure thresholds than cool-adapted populations (Blasini et al., <span>2021</span>; Posch et al., <span>2024</span>), given their high susceptibility to drought-induced xylem cavitation (Leffler et al., <span>2000</span>; Tyree et al., <span>1994</span>).</p>\n<p>We investigated G × E interactions using leaf-level VSWIR spectroscopy and canopy-level UAV thermal data by exploring intra- and interspecific drought responses in cottonwood (<i>Populus</i> spp.). First, we explored interspecific drought responses of three <i>Populus</i> cross types, <i>P. fremontii</i>, <i>P. angustifolia</i> and their hybrids, using leaf VSWIR reflectance data collected during two greenhouse drought experiments. We focused on quantifying their spectral shifts and phenotypic convergence under environmental stress, hypothesizing that, while the spectral space of the three cross types will shift as a result of drought, their spectra will be distinct regardless of drought status. We additionally assessed intraspecific G × E interactions in <i>P. fremontii</i> by evaluating how variations in source population mean annual temperature (MAT) impacted drought responses in leaf-level VSWIR and canopy-level UAV thermal data from two common garden experiments. We hypothesized that intraspecific spectral and thermal responses to drought will reflect historic climate adaptations to heat and drought, and warm-adapted populations will exhibit lower leaf temperatures pre-drought but will be more impacted by drought than cool-adapted populations. By investigating the drought response of foundation tree species using remote sensing, we sought to explore and demonstrate remote sensing as a tool for quantifying and monitoring intra- and interspecific variation in response to environmental stressors at local to landscape scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote sensing reveals inter- and intraspecific variation in riparian cottonwood (Populus spp) response to drought\",\"authors\":\"Megan M. Seeley, Benjamin C. Wiebe, Catherine A. Gehring, Kevin R. Hultine, Bradley C. Posch, Hillary F. Cooper, Elena A. Schaefer, Beatrice M. Bock, Andrew J. Abraham, Madeline E. Moran, Arthur Keith, Gerard J. Allan, Maya Scull, Thomas G. Whitham, Roberta M. Martin, Gregory P. Asner, Christopher E. Doughty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2745.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h2>1 INTRODUCTION</h2>\\n<p>Climate change exacerbates drought conditions in many regions (Dai, <span>2011</span>; Stocker et al., <span>2014</span>), increasing vegetation stress, plant mortality and biodiversity loss while disrupting critical mutualisms and ecosystem stability (Allen et al., <span>2010</span>; Au et al., <span>2023</span>; Steinkamp & Hickler, <span>2015</span>; Stone et al., <span>2018</span>). Prolonged and severe drought conditions threaten vital ecosystem services (Breshears et al., <span>2011</span>; Wolf & Paul-Limoges, <span>2023</span>), yet forests have demonstrated resilience and adaptive capacity to water stress (Amlin & Rood, <span>2003</span>; Anderegg et al., <span>2018</span>; Phelan et al., <span>2022</span>). This resilience can be driven by genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, as both intraspecific and interspecific variations shape ecosystem responses to drought (Anderegg et al., <span>2018</span>; Grossiord, <span>2020</span>; Rodríguez-Alarcón et al., <span>2022</span>). Remote sensing is a powerful, non-destructive tool for examining G × E interactions at multiple scales, capturing forest responses to water stress across species, populations and landscapes.</p>\\n<p>Spectroscopy and thermal imaging are particularly effective for studying G × E interactions in the context of drought, as they capture physiological responses to water stress across spatial and temporal scales (Cotrozzi et al., <span>2017</span>; Le et al., <span>2023</span>; Li et al., <span>2023</span>; Sapes et al., <span>2024</span>). Spectroscopy, which captures data across the visible through shortwave infrared (VSWR; 350–2500 nm) spectrum at short wavelength intervals (e.g. 1–10 nm), allows us to detect changes in plant traits indicative of water stress (e.g. rehydration capacity, leaf water potential, relative water content, electrolyte leakage) before they are visually apparent (Cotrozzi et al., <span>2017</span>; Mohd Asaari et al., <span>2022</span>; Sapes et al., <span>2024</span>). Water stress, quantified as canopy water content, has been estimated across large spatial scales using imaging spectroscopy (Asner et al., <span>2016</span>). These data further capture changes in other leaf traits (e.g. leaf mass per area, chlorophyll content; Asner & Martin, <span>2016</span>), providing a non-destructive measure of plant phenotypes at both the leaf and landscape levels. While the entire VSWIR spectrum is used to capture plant physiological responses, specific regions contribute distinct information: the visible range (400–700 nm) largely reflects photosynthetic pigments like chlorophyll, the near-infrared (NIR; 750–1300 nm) detects variation in cell structure and water content, and the shortwave infrared (SWIR; 1300–2500 nm) is often indicative of non-photosynthetic plant traits such as lignins and tannins (Asner & Martin, <span>2016</span>). Furthermore, recent studies by Corbin et al. (<span>2025</span>) show that spectroscopy is adept at discriminating among populations and genotypes and detecting G × E interactions of <i>P. fremontii</i>, one of the species used in the present study. By detecting drought stress and phenotypic responses across environments, spectroscopy captures plant water-use strategies and adaptive capacities, forming a foundation to advance our understanding of local adaptations, community structure, phytochemistry and stress responses as well as for scaling these analyses to broader spatial extents through complementary remote sensing methods such as thermal imaging.</p>\\n<p>Thermal imaging is another important remote sensing tool for investigating variation among water-use strategies, plant water status and drought tolerance at large spatial scales (Fuchs, <span>1990</span>; Scherrer et al., <span>2011</span>). Leaf and canopy temperatures, mediated by transpiration via evaporative cooling (latent heat loss), rise when water availability is limited, making thermal imaging a reliable indicator of water stress. This approach has been successfully applied in plant and ecosystem sciences using platforms such as towers, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and satellites (Farella et al., <span>2022</span>). By capturing G × E interactions at landscape scales, thermal imaging and spectroscopy offer a means of understanding ecosystem responses as climate change intensifies drought across many regions.</p>\\n<p>Given the growing importance of understanding G × E interactions in the context of climate change, cottonwoods offer ideal case studies for investigating water stress in trees due to their significant intra- and interspecific variation, which mediates their response to environmental stressors (Blasini et al., <span>2021</span>, <span>2022</span>; Bothwell et al., <span>2023</span>; Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Kaluthota et al., <span>2015</span>; Moran et al., <span>2023</span>; Woolbright et al., <span>2008</span>). Two cottonwood species, (<i>Populus fremontii</i> Wats. and <i>P. angustifolia</i> James) and their naturally occurring hybrids coinhabit riparian zones throughout the southwestern U.S. but also differ in their hydraulic traits. <i>Populus fremontii</i> (Fremont cottonwood) has higher canopy conductance (Fischer et al., <span>2004</span>) and less stomatal sensitivity to cumulative vapour pressure deficit over the growing season than its sister species, <i>P. angustifolia</i> (narrowleaf cottonwood; Guo et al., <span>2022</span>). Further, hybrids between <i>P. fremontii</i> and <i>P. angustifolia</i> display distinct genetic and ecological characteristics, such as the formation of hybrid zones that consist of <i>F</i><sub>1</sub> hybrids and backcross genotypes with the potential for increased tolerance to drought (Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Martinsen et al., <span>2001</span>; Whitham et al., <span>1999</span>). Hybrids are of special interest as their unique genetic combinations (<i>F</i><sub>1</sub>s to backcrosses; Hersch-Green et al., <span>2014</span>) provide targets for selection and the potential for evolution in response to climate change (see review by Peñalba et al., <span>2024</span>). Drought resilience in both <i>Populus</i> species is a pressing conservation concern as they constitute foundation species (Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>) that have declined due, in part, to water limitations, leading to the decline of riparian ecosystems in the American southwest (Braatne et al., <span>1996</span>; Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Stromberg, <span>2001</span>; Stromberg et al., <span>1996</span>).</p>\\n<p>Intraspecific differences—shaped largely by past climatic conditions—also play a key role in a species' ability to tolerate water stress (Gazol et al., <span>2023</span>; González de Andrés et al., <span>2021</span>; Jung et al., <span>2014</span>; Luo et al., <span>2023</span>). In <i>P. fremontii</i>, intraspecific variation is pronounced, with populations exhibiting distinct physiological adaptations to temperature and water availability, consistent with the recognition of distinct ecotypes across its range (Bothwell et al., <span>2023</span>; Hultine et al., <span>2020</span>; Ikeda et al., <span>2017</span>). For example, warm-adapted <i>P. fremontii</i> populations use high transpiration rates during heat waves to keep leaf temperatures below thermal thresholds (Blasini et al., <span>2021</span>; Moran et al., <span>2023</span>; Posch et al., <span>2024</span>). However, this greater capacity for leaf cooling comes at the cost of operating closer to hydraulic failure thresholds than cool-adapted populations (Blasini et al., <span>2021</span>; Posch et al., <span>2024</span>), given their high susceptibility to drought-induced xylem cavitation (Leffler et al., <span>2000</span>; Tyree et al., <span>1994</span>).</p>\\n<p>We investigated G × E interactions using leaf-level VSWIR spectroscopy and canopy-level UAV thermal data by exploring intra- and interspecific drought responses in cottonwood (<i>Populus</i> spp.). First, we explored interspecific drought responses of three <i>Populus</i> cross types, <i>P. fremontii</i>, <i>P. angustifolia</i> and their hybrids, using leaf VSWIR reflectance data collected during two greenhouse drought experiments. We focused on quantifying their spectral shifts and phenotypic convergence under environmental stress, hypothesizing that, while the spectral space of the three cross types will shift as a result of drought, their spectra will be distinct regardless of drought status. We additionally assessed intraspecific G × E interactions in <i>P. fremontii</i> by evaluating how variations in source population mean annual temperature (MAT) impacted drought responses in leaf-level VSWIR and canopy-level UAV thermal data from two common garden experiments. We hypothesized that intraspecific spectral and thermal responses to drought will reflect historic climate adaptations to heat and drought, and warm-adapted populations will exhibit lower leaf temperatures pre-drought but will be more impacted by drought than cool-adapted populations. By investigating the drought response of foundation tree species using remote sensing, we sought to explore and demonstrate remote sensing as a tool for quantifying and monitoring intra- and interspecific variation in response to environmental stressors at local to landscape scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70061\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
气候变化加剧了许多地区的干旱状况(戴,2011;Stocker et al., 2014),增加植被胁迫、植物死亡率和生物多样性丧失,同时破坏关键的相互作用和生态系统稳定性(Allen et al., 2010;Au等人,2023;Steinkamp,Hickler, 2015;Stone et al., 2018)。长期和严重的干旱条件威胁着重要的生态系统服务(Breshears et al., 2011;狼,Paul-Limoges, 2023),但森林已经表现出对水压力的恢复力和适应能力(Amlin &;十字架,2003;Anderegg et al., 2018;Phelan et al., 2022)。这种恢复力可以由基因型-环境(G × E)相互作用驱动,因为种内和种间变化都会影响生态系统对干旱的反应(Anderegg等人,2018;Grossiord, 2020;Rodríguez-Alarcón et al., 2022)。遥感是一种强大的非破坏性工具,可用于在多个尺度上检查G × E相互作用,捕捉森林对不同物种、种群和景观的水资源压力的反应。光谱学和热成像对于研究干旱环境下的G × E相互作用特别有效,因为它们可以捕获跨时空尺度对水分胁迫的生理反应(Cotrozzi等人,2017;Le et al., 2023;Li et al., 2023;Sapes et al., 2024)。光谱学,通过短波红外(VSWR)捕获可见光数据;在较短的波长间隔(例如1-10 nm), 350-2500 nm的光谱,使我们能够检测到指示水分胁迫的植物性状的变化(例如,再水合能力、叶片水势、相对含水量、电解质泄漏),然后再看到它们(Cotrozzi等人,2017;Mohd Asaari等,2022;Sapes et al., 2024)。水分胁迫(被量化为冠层含水量)已通过成像光谱在大空间尺度上进行估算(Asner等人,2016)。这些数据进一步捕获了其他叶片性状的变化(如每面积叶质量、叶绿素含量;Asner,Martin, 2016),在叶片和景观水平上提供植物表型的非破坏性测量。虽然整个VSWIR光谱用于捕捉植物的生理反应,但特定区域提供了不同的信息:可见光范围(400-700 nm)主要反映叶绿素等光合色素,近红外(NIR;750-1300 nm)检测细胞结构和含水量的变化,短波红外(SWIR;1300 - 2500nm)通常表示非光合植物特性,如木质素和单宁(Asner &;马丁,2016)。此外,Corbin等人(2025)最近的研究表明,光谱学可以很好地区分种群和基因型,并检测fremontii(本研究中使用的物种之一)的G × E相互作用。通过检测不同环境下的干旱胁迫和表型反应,光谱学捕获了植物的水分利用策略和适应能力,为推进我们对当地适应、群落结构、植物化学和胁迫反应的理解奠定了基础,并为通过热成像等互补遥感方法将这些分析扩展到更广泛的空间范围奠定了基础。热成像是在大空间尺度上调查水利用策略、植物水分状况和抗旱性差异的另一个重要遥感工具(Fuchs, 1990;Scherrer et al., 2011)。当水分供应有限时,由蒸腾作用通过蒸发冷却(潜热损失)介导的叶片和冠层温度升高,使热成像成为水分胁迫的可靠指标。这种方法已经成功地应用于植物和生态系统科学中,使用了塔、无人机(uav)和卫星等平台(Farella et al., 2022)。通过在景观尺度上捕捉G × E相互作用,热成像和光谱为理解气候变化加剧许多地区干旱时生态系统的反应提供了一种手段。考虑到在气候变化背景下理解G × E相互作用的重要性日益增加,杨木为研究树木的水分胁迫提供了理想的案例研究,因为它们具有显著的种内和种间变异,这些变异介导了它们对环境压力的反应(Blasini等人,2021,2022;Bothwell et al., 2023;Hultine et al., 2020;Kaluthota et al., 2015;Moran et al., 2023;Woolbright et al., 2008)。两种白杨,白杨。和P. angustifolia James)及其自然产生的杂交种在整个美国西南部的河岸地带共存,但它们的水力特性也不同。与姊妹树种P. angustifolia(窄叶棉)相比,fremontii(白杨)的冠层导度更高(Fischer et al., 2004),气孔对生长季节累积蒸汽压赤字的敏感性更低;郭等人,2022)。此外,费氏假单胞菌与费氏假单胞菌杂交。 安古斯提叶表现出独特的遗传和生态特征,例如形成由F1杂交和回交基因型组成的杂交带,具有增强耐旱性的潜力(Hultine et al., 2020;Martinsen et al., 2001;Whitham et al., 1999)。杂种因其独特的遗传组合(f1到回交;Hersch-Green等人,2014年)为应对气候变化的选择和进化潜力提供了目标(见Peñalba等人,2024年的评论)。这两种杨树的抗旱能力是一个紧迫的保护问题,因为它们构成了基础物种(Hultine等人,2020),部分原因是水资源限制,导致美国西南部河岸生态系统的衰退(Braatne等人,1996;Hultine et al., 2020;Stromberg, 2001;Stromberg et al., 1996)。种内差异——很大程度上是由过去的气候条件形成的——在物种耐受水分胁迫的能力中也起着关键作用(Gazol et al., 2023;González de andr<s:1>等人,2021;Jung et al., 2014;罗等人,2023)。在fremontii中,种内变异是明显的,种群表现出对温度和水分供应的不同生理适应,这与在其范围内识别不同的生态型是一致的(Bothwell等人,2023;Hultine et al., 2020;池田等人,2017)。例如,适应温暖的fremontii种群在热浪期间利用高蒸腾速率将叶片温度保持在热阈值以下(Blasini et al., 2021;Moran et al., 2023;Posch et al., 2024)。然而,与适应冷却的种群相比,这种更大的叶片冷却能力的代价是更接近水力失效阈值(Blasini等人,2021;Posch et al., 2024),因为它们对干旱诱导的木质部空化非常敏感(Leffler et al., 2000;Tyree et al., 1994)。利用叶级VSWIR光谱和冠层级无人机热数据,研究了棉杨(Populus spp.)种内和种间干旱响应的G × E相互作用。首先,利用两个温室干旱试验中收集的叶片VSWIR反射数据,研究了三种杨树杂交类型fremontii、angustifolia及其杂交种的种间干旱响应。我们重点量化了它们在环境胁迫下的光谱位移和表型收敛,并假设,尽管干旱会导致三种杂交类型的光谱空间发生位移,但无论干旱状况如何,它们的光谱都是不同的。此外,我们通过评估源种群平均年温度(MAT)的变化如何影响叶片水平VSWIR和冠层水平无人机(UAV)的两个常见花园热数据,评估了fremontii种内G × E相互作用。我们假设,种内光谱和对干旱的热响应反映了历史上对高温和干旱的气候适应,而暖适应种群在干旱前会表现出较低的叶温,但受干旱的影响比冷适应种群更大。通过利用遥感研究基础树种的干旱响应,我们试图探索和证明遥感作为量化和监测在局部到景观尺度上对环境压力响应的种内和种间变化的工具。
Remote sensing reveals inter- and intraspecific variation in riparian cottonwood (Populus spp) response to drought
1 INTRODUCTION
Climate change exacerbates drought conditions in many regions (Dai, 2011; Stocker et al., 2014), increasing vegetation stress, plant mortality and biodiversity loss while disrupting critical mutualisms and ecosystem stability (Allen et al., 2010; Au et al., 2023; Steinkamp & Hickler, 2015; Stone et al., 2018). Prolonged and severe drought conditions threaten vital ecosystem services (Breshears et al., 2011; Wolf & Paul-Limoges, 2023), yet forests have demonstrated resilience and adaptive capacity to water stress (Amlin & Rood, 2003; Anderegg et al., 2018; Phelan et al., 2022). This resilience can be driven by genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions, as both intraspecific and interspecific variations shape ecosystem responses to drought (Anderegg et al., 2018; Grossiord, 2020; Rodríguez-Alarcón et al., 2022). Remote sensing is a powerful, non-destructive tool for examining G × E interactions at multiple scales, capturing forest responses to water stress across species, populations and landscapes.
Spectroscopy and thermal imaging are particularly effective for studying G × E interactions in the context of drought, as they capture physiological responses to water stress across spatial and temporal scales (Cotrozzi et al., 2017; Le et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023; Sapes et al., 2024). Spectroscopy, which captures data across the visible through shortwave infrared (VSWR; 350–2500 nm) spectrum at short wavelength intervals (e.g. 1–10 nm), allows us to detect changes in plant traits indicative of water stress (e.g. rehydration capacity, leaf water potential, relative water content, electrolyte leakage) before they are visually apparent (Cotrozzi et al., 2017; Mohd Asaari et al., 2022; Sapes et al., 2024). Water stress, quantified as canopy water content, has been estimated across large spatial scales using imaging spectroscopy (Asner et al., 2016). These data further capture changes in other leaf traits (e.g. leaf mass per area, chlorophyll content; Asner & Martin, 2016), providing a non-destructive measure of plant phenotypes at both the leaf and landscape levels. While the entire VSWIR spectrum is used to capture plant physiological responses, specific regions contribute distinct information: the visible range (400–700 nm) largely reflects photosynthetic pigments like chlorophyll, the near-infrared (NIR; 750–1300 nm) detects variation in cell structure and water content, and the shortwave infrared (SWIR; 1300–2500 nm) is often indicative of non-photosynthetic plant traits such as lignins and tannins (Asner & Martin, 2016). Furthermore, recent studies by Corbin et al. (2025) show that spectroscopy is adept at discriminating among populations and genotypes and detecting G × E interactions of P. fremontii, one of the species used in the present study. By detecting drought stress and phenotypic responses across environments, spectroscopy captures plant water-use strategies and adaptive capacities, forming a foundation to advance our understanding of local adaptations, community structure, phytochemistry and stress responses as well as for scaling these analyses to broader spatial extents through complementary remote sensing methods such as thermal imaging.
Thermal imaging is another important remote sensing tool for investigating variation among water-use strategies, plant water status and drought tolerance at large spatial scales (Fuchs, 1990; Scherrer et al., 2011). Leaf and canopy temperatures, mediated by transpiration via evaporative cooling (latent heat loss), rise when water availability is limited, making thermal imaging a reliable indicator of water stress. This approach has been successfully applied in plant and ecosystem sciences using platforms such as towers, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and satellites (Farella et al., 2022). By capturing G × E interactions at landscape scales, thermal imaging and spectroscopy offer a means of understanding ecosystem responses as climate change intensifies drought across many regions.
Given the growing importance of understanding G × E interactions in the context of climate change, cottonwoods offer ideal case studies for investigating water stress in trees due to their significant intra- and interspecific variation, which mediates their response to environmental stressors (Blasini et al., 2021, 2022; Bothwell et al., 2023; Hultine et al., 2020; Kaluthota et al., 2015; Moran et al., 2023; Woolbright et al., 2008). Two cottonwood species, (Populus fremontii Wats. and P. angustifolia James) and their naturally occurring hybrids coinhabit riparian zones throughout the southwestern U.S. but also differ in their hydraulic traits. Populus fremontii (Fremont cottonwood) has higher canopy conductance (Fischer et al., 2004) and less stomatal sensitivity to cumulative vapour pressure deficit over the growing season than its sister species, P. angustifolia (narrowleaf cottonwood; Guo et al., 2022). Further, hybrids between P. fremontii and P. angustifolia display distinct genetic and ecological characteristics, such as the formation of hybrid zones that consist of F1 hybrids and backcross genotypes with the potential for increased tolerance to drought (Hultine et al., 2020; Martinsen et al., 2001; Whitham et al., 1999). Hybrids are of special interest as their unique genetic combinations (F1s to backcrosses; Hersch-Green et al., 2014) provide targets for selection and the potential for evolution in response to climate change (see review by Peñalba et al., 2024). Drought resilience in both Populus species is a pressing conservation concern as they constitute foundation species (Hultine et al., 2020) that have declined due, in part, to water limitations, leading to the decline of riparian ecosystems in the American southwest (Braatne et al., 1996; Hultine et al., 2020; Stromberg, 2001; Stromberg et al., 1996).
Intraspecific differences—shaped largely by past climatic conditions—also play a key role in a species' ability to tolerate water stress (Gazol et al., 2023; González de Andrés et al., 2021; Jung et al., 2014; Luo et al., 2023). In P. fremontii, intraspecific variation is pronounced, with populations exhibiting distinct physiological adaptations to temperature and water availability, consistent with the recognition of distinct ecotypes across its range (Bothwell et al., 2023; Hultine et al., 2020; Ikeda et al., 2017). For example, warm-adapted P. fremontii populations use high transpiration rates during heat waves to keep leaf temperatures below thermal thresholds (Blasini et al., 2021; Moran et al., 2023; Posch et al., 2024). However, this greater capacity for leaf cooling comes at the cost of operating closer to hydraulic failure thresholds than cool-adapted populations (Blasini et al., 2021; Posch et al., 2024), given their high susceptibility to drought-induced xylem cavitation (Leffler et al., 2000; Tyree et al., 1994).
We investigated G × E interactions using leaf-level VSWIR spectroscopy and canopy-level UAV thermal data by exploring intra- and interspecific drought responses in cottonwood (Populus spp.). First, we explored interspecific drought responses of three Populus cross types, P. fremontii, P. angustifolia and their hybrids, using leaf VSWIR reflectance data collected during two greenhouse drought experiments. We focused on quantifying their spectral shifts and phenotypic convergence under environmental stress, hypothesizing that, while the spectral space of the three cross types will shift as a result of drought, their spectra will be distinct regardless of drought status. We additionally assessed intraspecific G × E interactions in P. fremontii by evaluating how variations in source population mean annual temperature (MAT) impacted drought responses in leaf-level VSWIR and canopy-level UAV thermal data from two common garden experiments. We hypothesized that intraspecific spectral and thermal responses to drought will reflect historic climate adaptations to heat and drought, and warm-adapted populations will exhibit lower leaf temperatures pre-drought but will be more impacted by drought than cool-adapted populations. By investigating the drought response of foundation tree species using remote sensing, we sought to explore and demonstrate remote sensing as a tool for quantifying and monitoring intra- and interspecific variation in response to environmental stressors at local to landscape scales.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants.
We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.