基于GEDI的全球森林立地垂直植物面积指数剖面产品的验证

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yao Wang , Hongliang Fang , Yu Li , Sijia Li , Hao Tang
{"title":"基于GEDI的全球森林立地垂直植物面积指数剖面产品的验证","authors":"Yao Wang ,&nbsp;Hongliang Fang ,&nbsp;Yu Li ,&nbsp;Sijia Li ,&nbsp;Hao Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Knowledge of the vertical plant area index (PAI) profile is critical for understanding the forest structural and functional characteristics. Vertical PAI profile has been retrieved by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne LiDAR. However, large-scale validation of the GEDI PAI profile products is limited, and their performance has yet to be clearly established. This study aims to systematically assess the performance of GEDI PAI profile product and investigate the impact factors on PAI profile estimates. The digital hemispherical photography (DHP) of vertical measurement and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data were collected to derive the reference PAI profiles. The results indicate that adjusting footprint geolocation before GEDI validation is essential for enhancing product assessment. The GEDI PAI profile moderately agrees with the DHP and ALS (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84 and 0.58, respectively) but underestimates the reference (bias = −0.14 and −0.28, respectively). The needleleaf forest exhibits the highest agreement with ALS (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60 and bias = −0.16), while shrubland shows the lowest agreement (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.38 and bias = 0.21). The agreement between GEDI and ALS increases with the canopy height but decreases with the canopy cover. Low vegetation height and steep slopes affect the GEDI PAI accuracy owing to the difficulty in decomposing the mixed ground and canopy returns. Additionally, the limited penetration of GEDI in dense vegetation with high canopy cover contributes to the underestimation. The performance of GEDI PAI profile can be improved by applying a specific canopy and ground reflectance ratio (<span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub></math></span>/<span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></math></span>) value derived from the linear regression of return energy. The discrepancies between GEDI and ALS PAI profiles were partially attributed to the sub-optimal waveform processing algorithm settings and differences in LiDAR specifications. Further improvement to the GEDI PAI product may be achieved by implementing a customized waveform processing algorithm and using realistic <span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub></math></span>/<span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></math></span> values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"371 ","pages":"Article 110612"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the vertical plant area index profile product derived from GEDI over global forest sites\",\"authors\":\"Yao Wang ,&nbsp;Hongliang Fang ,&nbsp;Yu Li ,&nbsp;Sijia Li ,&nbsp;Hao Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Knowledge of the vertical plant area index (PAI) profile is critical for understanding the forest structural and functional characteristics. Vertical PAI profile has been retrieved by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne LiDAR. However, large-scale validation of the GEDI PAI profile products is limited, and their performance has yet to be clearly established. This study aims to systematically assess the performance of GEDI PAI profile product and investigate the impact factors on PAI profile estimates. The digital hemispherical photography (DHP) of vertical measurement and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data were collected to derive the reference PAI profiles. The results indicate that adjusting footprint geolocation before GEDI validation is essential for enhancing product assessment. The GEDI PAI profile moderately agrees with the DHP and ALS (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84 and 0.58, respectively) but underestimates the reference (bias = −0.14 and −0.28, respectively). The needleleaf forest exhibits the highest agreement with ALS (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60 and bias = −0.16), while shrubland shows the lowest agreement (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.38 and bias = 0.21). The agreement between GEDI and ALS increases with the canopy height but decreases with the canopy cover. Low vegetation height and steep slopes affect the GEDI PAI accuracy owing to the difficulty in decomposing the mixed ground and canopy returns. Additionally, the limited penetration of GEDI in dense vegetation with high canopy cover contributes to the underestimation. The performance of GEDI PAI profile can be improved by applying a specific canopy and ground reflectance ratio (<span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub></math></span>/<span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></math></span>) value derived from the linear regression of return energy. The discrepancies between GEDI and ALS PAI profiles were partially attributed to the sub-optimal waveform processing algorithm settings and differences in LiDAR specifications. Further improvement to the GEDI PAI product may be achieved by implementing a customized waveform processing algorithm and using realistic <span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>v</mi></msub></math></span>/<span><math><msub><mi>ρ</mi><mi>g</mi></msub></math></span> values.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"371 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325002321\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325002321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解垂直植物面积指数(PAI)对了解森林结构和功能特征至关重要。全球生态系统动力学调查(GEDI)星载激光雷达检索了垂直PAI剖面。然而,GEDI PAI型材产品的大规模验证有限,其性能尚未明确确立。本研究旨在系统评估GEDI PAI型材产品的性能,并探讨影响PAI型材评估的因素。利用垂直测量的数字半球面摄影(DHP)和机载激光扫描(ALS)数据,推导出参考PAI剖面。结果表明,在GEDI验证前调整足迹地理位置对提高产品评价具有重要意义。GEDI PAI剖面与DHP和ALS大致一致(R2分别为0.84和0.58),但低估了参考(偏差分别为- 0.14和- 0.28)。针叶林与ALS的一致性最高(R2 = 0.60,偏差= - 0.16),灌木林与ALS的一致性最低(R2 = 0.38,偏差= 0.21)。GEDI和ALS的一致性随冠层高度的增加而增加,随冠层盖度的增加而降低。低植被高度和陡坡会影响GEDI PAI的精度,因为地面和冠层混合回波难以分解。此外,在高冠层盖度的茂密植被中,GEDI的穿透量有限,也导致了GEDI的低估。利用回归能量线性回归得到的特定冠层与地面反射率比值(ρvρv/ρgρg)值,可以提高GEDI PAI剖面的性能。GEDI和ALS PAI曲线之间的差异部分归因于次优波形处理算法设置和LiDAR规格的差异。对GEDI PAI产品的进一步改进可以通过实现定制的波形处理算法和使用真实的ρvρv/ρgρg值来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the vertical plant area index profile product derived from GEDI over global forest sites
Knowledge of the vertical plant area index (PAI) profile is critical for understanding the forest structural and functional characteristics. Vertical PAI profile has been retrieved by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne LiDAR. However, large-scale validation of the GEDI PAI profile products is limited, and their performance has yet to be clearly established. This study aims to systematically assess the performance of GEDI PAI profile product and investigate the impact factors on PAI profile estimates. The digital hemispherical photography (DHP) of vertical measurement and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data were collected to derive the reference PAI profiles. The results indicate that adjusting footprint geolocation before GEDI validation is essential for enhancing product assessment. The GEDI PAI profile moderately agrees with the DHP and ALS (R2 = 0.84 and 0.58, respectively) but underestimates the reference (bias = −0.14 and −0.28, respectively). The needleleaf forest exhibits the highest agreement with ALS (R2 = 0.60 and bias = −0.16), while shrubland shows the lowest agreement (R2 = 0.38 and bias = 0.21). The agreement between GEDI and ALS increases with the canopy height but decreases with the canopy cover. Low vegetation height and steep slopes affect the GEDI PAI accuracy owing to the difficulty in decomposing the mixed ground and canopy returns. Additionally, the limited penetration of GEDI in dense vegetation with high canopy cover contributes to the underestimation. The performance of GEDI PAI profile can be improved by applying a specific canopy and ground reflectance ratio (ρv/ρg) value derived from the linear regression of return energy. The discrepancies between GEDI and ALS PAI profiles were partially attributed to the sub-optimal waveform processing algorithm settings and differences in LiDAR specifications. Further improvement to the GEDI PAI product may be achieved by implementing a customized waveform processing algorithm and using realistic ρv/ρg values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信