在英国,患有严重精神疾病的人被排除在激励的身体健康检查之外的特征:电子医疗记录研究。

Naomi Launders,Caroline A Jackson,Joseph F Hayes,Ann John,Robert Stewart,Matthew H Iveson,Elvira Bramon,Bruce Guthrie,Stewart W Mercer,David P J Osborn
{"title":"在英国,患有严重精神疾病的人被排除在激励的身体健康检查之外的特征:电子医疗记录研究。","authors":"Naomi Launders,Caroline A Jackson,Joseph F Hayes,Ann John,Robert Stewart,Matthew H Iveson,Elvira Bramon,Bruce Guthrie,Stewart W Mercer,David P J Osborn","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPhysical health checks in primary care for people with severe mental illness ((SMI) defined as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and non-organic psychosis) aim to reduce health inequalities. Patients who decline or are deemed unsuitable for screening are removed from the denominator used to calculate incentivisation, termed exception reporting.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nTo describe the prevalence of, and patient characteristics associated with, exception reporting in patients with SMI.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nWe identified adult patients with SMI from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), registered with a general practice between 2004 and 2018. We calculated the annual prevalence of exception reporting and investigated patient characteristics associated with exception reporting, using logistic regression.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 193 850 patients with SMI, 27.7% were exception reported from physical health checks at least once. Exception reporting owing to non-response or declining screening increased over the study period. Patients of Asian or Black ethnicity (Asian: odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80; Black: odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97; compared with White) and women (odds ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92) had a reduced odds of being exception reported, whereas patients diagnosed with 'other psychoses' (odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.15-1.23; compared with bipolar disorder) had increased odds. Younger patients and those diagnosed with schizophrenia were more likely to be exception reported owing to informed dissent.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nException reporting was common in people with SMI. Interventions are required to improve accessibility and uptake of physical health checks to improve physical health in people with SMI.","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of people with severe mental illness excluded from incentivised physical health checks in the UK: electronic healthcare record study.\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Launders,Caroline A Jackson,Joseph F Hayes,Ann John,Robert Stewart,Matthew H Iveson,Elvira Bramon,Bruce Guthrie,Stewart W Mercer,David P J Osborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2025.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPhysical health checks in primary care for people with severe mental illness ((SMI) defined as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and non-organic psychosis) aim to reduce health inequalities. Patients who decline or are deemed unsuitable for screening are removed from the denominator used to calculate incentivisation, termed exception reporting.\\r\\n\\r\\nAIMS\\r\\nTo describe the prevalence of, and patient characteristics associated with, exception reporting in patients with SMI.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nWe identified adult patients with SMI from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), registered with a general practice between 2004 and 2018. We calculated the annual prevalence of exception reporting and investigated patient characteristics associated with exception reporting, using logistic regression.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 193 850 patients with SMI, 27.7% were exception reported from physical health checks at least once. Exception reporting owing to non-response or declining screening increased over the study period. Patients of Asian or Black ethnicity (Asian: odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80; Black: odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97; compared with White) and women (odds ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92) had a reduced odds of being exception reported, whereas patients diagnosed with 'other psychoses' (odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.15-1.23; compared with bipolar disorder) had increased odds. Younger patients and those diagnosed with schizophrenia were more likely to be exception reported owing to informed dissent.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nException reporting was common in people with SMI. Interventions are required to improve accessibility and uptake of physical health checks to improve physical health in people with SMI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景严重精神疾病(SMI)定义为精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和非器质性精神病)患者的初级保健体检旨在减少健康不平等。拒绝或被认为不适合筛查的患者从用于计算激励的分母中删除,称为例外报告。目的描述重度精神分裂症患者异常报告的患病率和患者特征。方法:我们从英国临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)中确定了2004年至2018年间在全科医生注册的SMI成年患者。我们计算了异常报告的年患病率,并使用逻辑回归调查了与异常报告相关的患者特征。结果在193 850例重度精神障碍患者中,27.7%的患者至少有一次体检异常。在研究期间,由于无反应或筛查减少而报告的例外情况有所增加。亚洲或黑人患者(亚洲:优势比0.72,95% CI 0.65-0.80;黑色:优势比0.86,95% CI 0.76-0.97;与怀特(White)和女性(优势比0.90,95% CI 0.88-0.92)相比,异常报告的几率降低,而诊断为“其他精神病”的患者(优势比1.19,95% CI 1.15-1.23;与双相情感障碍相比)的几率增加。年轻患者和被诊断为精神分裂症的患者更有可能因知情异议而被例外报道。结论重度精神障碍患者的异常报告较为普遍。需要采取干预措施,改善身体健康检查的可及性和接受程度,以改善重度精神分裂症患者的身体健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of people with severe mental illness excluded from incentivised physical health checks in the UK: electronic healthcare record study.
BACKGROUND Physical health checks in primary care for people with severe mental illness ((SMI) defined as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders and non-organic psychosis) aim to reduce health inequalities. Patients who decline or are deemed unsuitable for screening are removed from the denominator used to calculate incentivisation, termed exception reporting. AIMS To describe the prevalence of, and patient characteristics associated with, exception reporting in patients with SMI. METHOD We identified adult patients with SMI from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), registered with a general practice between 2004 and 2018. We calculated the annual prevalence of exception reporting and investigated patient characteristics associated with exception reporting, using logistic regression. RESULTS Of 193 850 patients with SMI, 27.7% were exception reported from physical health checks at least once. Exception reporting owing to non-response or declining screening increased over the study period. Patients of Asian or Black ethnicity (Asian: odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80; Black: odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97; compared with White) and women (odds ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92) had a reduced odds of being exception reported, whereas patients diagnosed with 'other psychoses' (odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.15-1.23; compared with bipolar disorder) had increased odds. Younger patients and those diagnosed with schizophrenia were more likely to be exception reported owing to informed dissent. CONCLUSIONS Exception reporting was common in people with SMI. Interventions are required to improve accessibility and uptake of physical health checks to improve physical health in people with SMI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信