刺激抽样再造:设计混合匹配实验,用刺激图分析结果。

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Uri Simonsohn,Andres Montealegre,Ioannis Evangelidis
{"title":"刺激抽样再造:设计混合匹配实验,用刺激图分析结果。","authors":"Uri Simonsohn,Andres Montealegre,Ioannis Evangelidis","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stimuli selection in psychology experiments is typically unsystematic, undocumented, and irreproducible. This makes confounds likely to arise. The statistical analysis of psychology experiments with multiple stimuli, in turn, is typically reported at the aggregate level, averaging across stimuli. This makes confounds unlikely to be detected. Here, we propose changing both the design and analysis of psychology experiments. We introduce \"Mix-and-Match,\" a procedure to systematically and reproducibly stratify-sample stimuli, and \"Stimulus Plots,\" a visualization to report stimulus-level results, contrasting observed with expected variation. We apply both innovations to published studies demonstrating how things would be different with our reimagined approach to stimulus sampling. Finally, we introduce a Mix-and-Match Disclosure Form we propose authors rely on to communicate the design of their studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulus sampling reimagined: Designing experiments with mix-and-match, analyzing results with stimulus plots.\",\"authors\":\"Uri Simonsohn,Andres Montealegre,Ioannis Evangelidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pspa0000449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stimuli selection in psychology experiments is typically unsystematic, undocumented, and irreproducible. This makes confounds likely to arise. The statistical analysis of psychology experiments with multiple stimuli, in turn, is typically reported at the aggregate level, averaging across stimuli. This makes confounds unlikely to be detected. Here, we propose changing both the design and analysis of psychology experiments. We introduce \\\"Mix-and-Match,\\\" a procedure to systematically and reproducibly stratify-sample stimuli, and \\\"Stimulus Plots,\\\" a visualization to report stimulus-level results, contrasting observed with expected variation. We apply both innovations to published studies demonstrating how things would be different with our reimagined approach to stimulus sampling. Finally, we introduce a Mix-and-Match Disclosure Form we propose authors rely on to communicate the design of their studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":16691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of personality and social psychology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of personality and social psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000449\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000449","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理学实验中的刺激选择通常是不系统的、没有记录的和不可复制的。这就有可能产生混乱。反过来,对多重刺激的心理学实验的统计分析通常在总体水平上报告,在刺激上平均。这使得混淆不太可能被发现。在此,我们建议改变心理学实验的设计和分析。我们引入了“混合和匹配”,这是一种系统地、可重复地分层样本刺激的程序,以及“刺激图”,这是一种报告刺激水平结果的可视化方法,将观察到的变化与预期的变化进行对比。我们将这两项创新应用于已发表的研究,展示了我们重新设想的刺激抽样方法将如何不同。最后,我们介绍了一个混合和匹配披露表,我们建议作者依靠它来传达他们的研究设计。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stimulus sampling reimagined: Designing experiments with mix-and-match, analyzing results with stimulus plots.
Stimuli selection in psychology experiments is typically unsystematic, undocumented, and irreproducible. This makes confounds likely to arise. The statistical analysis of psychology experiments with multiple stimuli, in turn, is typically reported at the aggregate level, averaging across stimuli. This makes confounds unlikely to be detected. Here, we propose changing both the design and analysis of psychology experiments. We introduce "Mix-and-Match," a procedure to systematically and reproducibly stratify-sample stimuli, and "Stimulus Plots," a visualization to report stimulus-level results, contrasting observed with expected variation. We apply both innovations to published studies demonstrating how things would be different with our reimagined approach to stimulus sampling. Finally, we introduce a Mix-and-Match Disclosure Form we propose authors rely on to communicate the design of their studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信