William N Koller,Joan Danielle K Ongchoco,Michael V Bronstein,Brian J Scholl,Tyrone D Cannon
{"title":"记忆中的“超近因”偏见是精神病和抑郁经历的特征。","authors":"William N Koller,Joan Danielle K Ongchoco,Michael V Bronstein,Brian J Scholl,Tyrone D Cannon","doi":"10.1037/xge0001754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychosis is characterized by salient conflicts between reality and one's experience of it. Many people in the general population experience similar conflicts, albeit to a lesser extent-including during déjà vu, in which one is struck by the feeling that they have lived through the present moment before, despite not being able to pinpoint why or knowing that this cannot be true. The cognitive processes underlying these conflicts between reality and experience in psychosis and the general population remain poorly understood. Identifying shared cognitive correlates of psychosis-like symptoms and déjà vu is a compelling starting place for better understanding how such conflicts arise. Here, we hypothesized that psychosis-like symptoms and déjà vu might be related to breakdowns in memory for when events happened. Across two preregistered experiments (N = 500), we found that members of the general population endorsing higher levels of psychoticism (i.e., paranoia, positive, and disorganized symptoms) judged correctly recognized stimuli to have occurred more recently in time relative to ground truth. A similar illusion of recency was apparent for falsely recognized stimuli. These same participants were less sensitive to actual stimulus recency when making recognition memory judgments, exhibiting reduced differentiation between recently presented and novel stimuli. Similar patterns were found in association with déjà vu, but not negative (i.e., mood-related) symptoms, suggesting specificity to uncanny subjective experiences. These findings suggest that a \"hyper-recency\" bias in memory-wherein remotely encountered events are perceived as having happened recently-might represent one salient source of conflict between experience and reality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"5 1","pages":"1428-1444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A \\\"hyper-recency\\\" bias in memory characterizes both psychoticism and déjà vu experiences.\",\"authors\":\"William N Koller,Joan Danielle K Ongchoco,Michael V Bronstein,Brian J Scholl,Tyrone D Cannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xge0001754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Psychosis is characterized by salient conflicts between reality and one's experience of it. Many people in the general population experience similar conflicts, albeit to a lesser extent-including during déjà vu, in which one is struck by the feeling that they have lived through the present moment before, despite not being able to pinpoint why or knowing that this cannot be true. The cognitive processes underlying these conflicts between reality and experience in psychosis and the general population remain poorly understood. Identifying shared cognitive correlates of psychosis-like symptoms and déjà vu is a compelling starting place for better understanding how such conflicts arise. Here, we hypothesized that psychosis-like symptoms and déjà vu might be related to breakdowns in memory for when events happened. Across two preregistered experiments (N = 500), we found that members of the general population endorsing higher levels of psychoticism (i.e., paranoia, positive, and disorganized symptoms) judged correctly recognized stimuli to have occurred more recently in time relative to ground truth. A similar illusion of recency was apparent for falsely recognized stimuli. These same participants were less sensitive to actual stimulus recency when making recognition memory judgments, exhibiting reduced differentiation between recently presented and novel stimuli. Similar patterns were found in association with déjà vu, but not negative (i.e., mood-related) symptoms, suggesting specificity to uncanny subjective experiences. These findings suggest that a \\\"hyper-recency\\\" bias in memory-wherein remotely encountered events are perceived as having happened recently-might represent one salient source of conflict between experience and reality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":15698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1428-1444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001754\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001754","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
精神病的特点是现实与个人对现实的体验之间存在显著的冲突。一般人群中的许多人都经历过类似的冲突,尽管程度较轻——包括在“郁闷”期间,在这种情况下,人们会被一种感觉所震撼,即他们以前经历过现在的时刻,尽管无法确定原因或知道这不是真的。精神病患者和一般人群的现实和经验之间的冲突背后的认知过程仍然知之甚少。为了更好地理解这些冲突是如何产生的,确定与精神病样症状和抑郁相关的共同认知是一个令人信服的起点。在这里,我们假设精神病样症状和抑郁可能与事件发生时的记忆崩溃有关。在两个预先登记的实验(N = 500)中,我们发现,一般人群中认同较高程度精神病(即偏执、阳性和无组织症状)的成员,对正确识别的刺激的判断相对于基本事实发生的时间更近。对于错误识别的刺激,类似的近代性错觉也很明显。这些参与者在进行识别记忆判断时,对实际刺激的近时性不太敏感,表现出最近出现的刺激和新刺激之间的差异降低。类似的模式也被发现与d忧郁有关,但没有负面(即与情绪有关)症状,这表明对不可思议的主观体验具有特异性。这些发现表明,记忆中的“超近代性”偏见——远程遇到的事件被认为是最近发生的——可能是经验和现实之间冲突的一个显著来源。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
A "hyper-recency" bias in memory characterizes both psychoticism and déjà vu experiences.
Psychosis is characterized by salient conflicts between reality and one's experience of it. Many people in the general population experience similar conflicts, albeit to a lesser extent-including during déjà vu, in which one is struck by the feeling that they have lived through the present moment before, despite not being able to pinpoint why or knowing that this cannot be true. The cognitive processes underlying these conflicts between reality and experience in psychosis and the general population remain poorly understood. Identifying shared cognitive correlates of psychosis-like symptoms and déjà vu is a compelling starting place for better understanding how such conflicts arise. Here, we hypothesized that psychosis-like symptoms and déjà vu might be related to breakdowns in memory for when events happened. Across two preregistered experiments (N = 500), we found that members of the general population endorsing higher levels of psychoticism (i.e., paranoia, positive, and disorganized symptoms) judged correctly recognized stimuli to have occurred more recently in time relative to ground truth. A similar illusion of recency was apparent for falsely recognized stimuli. These same participants were less sensitive to actual stimulus recency when making recognition memory judgments, exhibiting reduced differentiation between recently presented and novel stimuli. Similar patterns were found in association with déjà vu, but not negative (i.e., mood-related) symptoms, suggesting specificity to uncanny subjective experiences. These findings suggest that a "hyper-recency" bias in memory-wherein remotely encountered events are perceived as having happened recently-might represent one salient source of conflict between experience and reality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.