英国死产的差异:一项基于130万新生儿的人口研究分析。

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ggenga Kayode, Baskaran Thilaganathan, Christy Burden, Amy Howell, Vincent Cheng, Jane Sandall, Maria Viner, Lia Brigante, Dilly Anumba, Cathy Winter, Birte Harlev-Lam, Timothy Draycott, Andrew Judge, Erik Lenguerrand, Tommy's National Centre for Maternity Improvement
{"title":"英国死产的差异:一项基于130万新生儿的人口研究分析。","authors":"Ggenga Kayode,&nbsp;Baskaran Thilaganathan,&nbsp;Christy Burden,&nbsp;Amy Howell,&nbsp;Vincent Cheng,&nbsp;Jane Sandall,&nbsp;Maria Viner,&nbsp;Lia Brigante,&nbsp;Dilly Anumba,&nbsp;Cathy Winter,&nbsp;Birte Harlev-Lam,&nbsp;Timothy Draycott,&nbsp;Andrew Judge,&nbsp;Erik Lenguerrand,&nbsp;Tommy's National Centre for Maternity Improvement","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the variation in stillbirth rates between different ethnic and socioeconomic groups within each organisational hospital group (health trust).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>National registry study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>All health trusts (HT) in National Health Service England.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>All mothers and babies born between April 2015 and March 2017.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This observational study examined ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in stillbirth rates for 1 268 367 births in 133 HTs compared to the national average.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcome</h3>\n \n <p>Stillbirth at or after 24 gestational weeks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average stillbirth rates ranged from 3.4/1000 births for White women up to 7.1/1000 births for Black women. The rates ranged from 2.9/1000 births for women living in the least deprived areas to 4.7/1000 births for those in the most deprived. The proportions of HTs with stillbirth rates well above the national average (more than 2 standard deviations) for White, Asian and Black women were 0.8%, 21.8% and 38.6%, respectively. When HTs were ranked by stillbirth rate, there were notable variations, with some trusts demonstrating lower than average stillbirth rates for White women while concurrently having higher than average stillbirth rates for Asian and/or Black women. There were no units exhibiting lower than national average stillbirth rates for Asian/Black women while concurrently having higher than average stillbirth rates for White women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that access to and delivery of maternity care vary depending on the mother's ethnicity and level of socioeconomic deprivation. Social factors are likely determinants of inequality in stillbirth rather than maternity care alone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 8","pages":"1130-1138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18147","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Stillbirths in England: Analysis of A Population-Based Study of 1.3 Million Births\",\"authors\":\"Ggenga Kayode,&nbsp;Baskaran Thilaganathan,&nbsp;Christy Burden,&nbsp;Amy Howell,&nbsp;Vincent Cheng,&nbsp;Jane Sandall,&nbsp;Maria Viner,&nbsp;Lia Brigante,&nbsp;Dilly Anumba,&nbsp;Cathy Winter,&nbsp;Birte Harlev-Lam,&nbsp;Timothy Draycott,&nbsp;Andrew Judge,&nbsp;Erik Lenguerrand,&nbsp;Tommy's National Centre for Maternity Improvement\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine the variation in stillbirth rates between different ethnic and socioeconomic groups within each organisational hospital group (health trust).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>National registry study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>All health trusts (HT) in National Health Service England.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>All mothers and babies born between April 2015 and March 2017.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This observational study examined ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in stillbirth rates for 1 268 367 births in 133 HTs compared to the national average.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Outcome</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stillbirth at or after 24 gestational weeks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The average stillbirth rates ranged from 3.4/1000 births for White women up to 7.1/1000 births for Black women. The rates ranged from 2.9/1000 births for women living in the least deprived areas to 4.7/1000 births for those in the most deprived. The proportions of HTs with stillbirth rates well above the national average (more than 2 standard deviations) for White, Asian and Black women were 0.8%, 21.8% and 38.6%, respectively. When HTs were ranked by stillbirth rate, there were notable variations, with some trusts demonstrating lower than average stillbirth rates for White women while concurrently having higher than average stillbirth rates for Asian and/or Black women. There were no units exhibiting lower than national average stillbirth rates for Asian/Black women while concurrently having higher than average stillbirth rates for White women.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings suggest that access to and delivery of maternity care vary depending on the mother's ethnicity and level of socioeconomic deprivation. Social factors are likely determinants of inequality in stillbirth rather than maternity care alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 8\",\"pages\":\"1130-1138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18147\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18147\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨各组织医院集团(卫生信托)内不同种族和社会经济群体之间死胎率的差异。国家注册研究。在英国国家医疗服务体系中设置所有健康信托基金。所有在2015年4月至2017年3月间出生的母亲和婴儿。方法:本观察性研究调查了133例HTs中1268367例死产的种族和社会经济差异,并与全国平均水平进行了比较。结果:妊娠24周或24周后死产。结果白人妇女的平均死产率为3.4/1000,黑人妇女的平均死产率为7.1/1000。比率从生活在最贫困地区的妇女的2.9/1000到生活在最贫困地区的妇女的4.7/1000不等。白人、亚洲和黑人妇女死产率远高于全国平均水平(超过2个标准差)的高流产率比例分别为0.8%、21.8%和38.6%。当ht按死产率进行排名时,有明显的差异,一些信托显示白人妇女的死产率低于平均水平,而同时亚洲和/或黑人妇女的死产率高于平均水平。没有哪个单位显示亚洲/黑人妇女的死产率低于全国平均水平,同时白人妇女的死产率高于平均水平。结论这些研究结果表明,获得和提供产妇保健取决于母亲的种族和社会经济剥夺水平。社会因素可能是死产不平等的决定因素,而不仅仅是产妇护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Stillbirths in England: Analysis of A Population-Based Study of 1.3 Million Births

Objective

To examine the variation in stillbirth rates between different ethnic and socioeconomic groups within each organisational hospital group (health trust).

Design

National registry study.

Setting

All health trusts (HT) in National Health Service England.

Population

All mothers and babies born between April 2015 and March 2017.

Methods

This observational study examined ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in stillbirth rates for 1 268 367 births in 133 HTs compared to the national average.

Outcome

Stillbirth at or after 24 gestational weeks.

Results

The average stillbirth rates ranged from 3.4/1000 births for White women up to 7.1/1000 births for Black women. The rates ranged from 2.9/1000 births for women living in the least deprived areas to 4.7/1000 births for those in the most deprived. The proportions of HTs with stillbirth rates well above the national average (more than 2 standard deviations) for White, Asian and Black women were 0.8%, 21.8% and 38.6%, respectively. When HTs were ranked by stillbirth rate, there were notable variations, with some trusts demonstrating lower than average stillbirth rates for White women while concurrently having higher than average stillbirth rates for Asian and/or Black women. There were no units exhibiting lower than national average stillbirth rates for Asian/Black women while concurrently having higher than average stillbirth rates for White women.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that access to and delivery of maternity care vary depending on the mother's ethnicity and level of socioeconomic deprivation. Social factors are likely determinants of inequality in stillbirth rather than maternity care alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信