变异性和需要统一的儿科护理指南在比利时:一项全国调查。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1111/apa.70105
Elise Ruysschaert, Thomas Antychin, Eline Vermeiren, Levi Hoste, Anne Rochtus, Amber Van Baelen
{"title":"变异性和需要统一的儿科护理指南在比利时:一项全国调查。","authors":"Elise Ruysschaert, Thomas Antychin, Eline Vermeiren, Levi Hoste, Anne Rochtus, Amber Van Baelen","doi":"10.1111/apa.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the current variability in the use of clinical care guidelines across hospitals and evaluate the potential for uniform guidelines throughout Belgium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey, consisting of 48 questions covering demographics, use of evidence-based medicine, and opinions on guideline standardisation, was conducted among paediatric trainees and paediatricians. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests (significance p < 0.05) and thematic analysis to explore variations in guideline use across hospitals, departments, and doctors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 124 participants responded, with an even distribution in years of training. Sixty-three percent were currently working at a university hospital. Common sources for guideline implementation included UpToDate (80%) and local guidelines (58%). The largest differences reported were in the choice of treatment options. Trainees generally consider university hospitals to have a higher number and more up-to-date guidelines. Experience-based medicine is more commonly practised than evidence-based medicine. Ninety percent of participants were convinced that uniform guidelines would enhance patient care, improve the quality of training, and promote evidence-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This national study indicates significant differences between hospitals, departments and practitioners in guidelines used. The majority of the participants support the adaptation of universal guidelines to improve both patient care and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability and Need for Uniformity in Paediatric Care Guidelines in Belgium: A National Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Elise Ruysschaert, Thomas Antychin, Eline Vermeiren, Levi Hoste, Anne Rochtus, Amber Van Baelen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apa.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the current variability in the use of clinical care guidelines across hospitals and evaluate the potential for uniform guidelines throughout Belgium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey, consisting of 48 questions covering demographics, use of evidence-based medicine, and opinions on guideline standardisation, was conducted among paediatric trainees and paediatricians. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests (significance p < 0.05) and thematic analysis to explore variations in guideline use across hospitals, departments, and doctors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 124 participants responded, with an even distribution in years of training. Sixty-three percent were currently working at a university hospital. Common sources for guideline implementation included UpToDate (80%) and local guidelines (58%). The largest differences reported were in the choice of treatment options. Trainees generally consider university hospitals to have a higher number and more up-to-date guidelines. Experience-based medicine is more commonly practised than evidence-based medicine. Ninety percent of participants were convinced that uniform guidelines would enhance patient care, improve the quality of training, and promote evidence-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This national study indicates significant differences between hospitals, departments and practitioners in guidelines used. The majority of the participants support the adaptation of universal guidelines to improve both patient care and education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Paediatrica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Paediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定目前各医院临床护理指南使用的可变性,并评估比利时统一指南的潜力。方法:对儿科培训生和儿科医生进行调查,包括人口统计学、循证医学的使用和对指南标准化的意见等48个问题。统计分析包括配对t检验(显著性p)结果:共有124名参与者回应,在培训年限中分布均匀。63%的人目前在大学医院工作。指南实现的常见来源包括UpToDate(80%)和本地指南(58%)。最大的差异是在治疗方案的选择上。受训者通常认为大学医院有更多最新的指导方针。基于经验的医学比基于证据的医学更普遍。90%的参与者相信,统一的指导方针将加强病人护理,提高培训质量,促进循证治疗。结论:这项全国性的研究表明医院、科室和从业人员在使用指南方面存在显著差异。大多数参与者支持调整通用指南,以改善患者护理和教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability and Need for Uniformity in Paediatric Care Guidelines in Belgium: A National Survey.

Aim: To determine the current variability in the use of clinical care guidelines across hospitals and evaluate the potential for uniform guidelines throughout Belgium.

Methods: A survey, consisting of 48 questions covering demographics, use of evidence-based medicine, and opinions on guideline standardisation, was conducted among paediatric trainees and paediatricians. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests (significance p < 0.05) and thematic analysis to explore variations in guideline use across hospitals, departments, and doctors.

Results: A total of 124 participants responded, with an even distribution in years of training. Sixty-three percent were currently working at a university hospital. Common sources for guideline implementation included UpToDate (80%) and local guidelines (58%). The largest differences reported were in the choice of treatment options. Trainees generally consider university hospitals to have a higher number and more up-to-date guidelines. Experience-based medicine is more commonly practised than evidence-based medicine. Ninety percent of participants were convinced that uniform guidelines would enhance patient care, improve the quality of training, and promote evidence-based treatment.

Conclusion: This national study indicates significant differences between hospitals, departments and practitioners in guidelines used. The majority of the participants support the adaptation of universal guidelines to improve both patient care and education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信