锥形-直锥形种植体的临床评价:回顾性分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hyunkyung Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Hyunjae Kim, Sungtae Kim, Young-Dan Cho
{"title":"锥形-直锥形种植体的临床评价:回顾性分析。","authors":"Hyunkyung Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Hyunjae Kim, Sungtae Kim, Young-Dan Cho","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2403220161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of tapered-straight-tapered dental implants, considering various associated factors, over an observational period of ≥5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 186 patients who underwent tapered-straight-tapered dental implant placement at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from 2014 to 2019. Digital panoramic radiographic images and dental records were examined. We evaluated multiple variables, such as sex, age, diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking status, placement region, jaw type (maxilla and mandible), implant diameter, implant length, staged surgery, immediate placement, splinted prosthesis, and implant placement depth (IPD). We first determined the implant survival rate using Kaplan-Meier analysis and analyzed potential risk factors for implant survival using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression. Next, the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences in MBL across variables. Linear mixed-effects models with backward stepwise selection were used to identify associations between risk factors and MBL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 316 implants in 186 patients, monitored over a follow-up period of 7.0±1.36 years. The cumulative survival rate of the implants was 98.1%. The average mesial and distal MBLs were 0.59±1.36 mm and 0.68±1.36 mm, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models indicated that MBL exhibited statistically significant positive correlations with DM (Coeff.=0.614, <i>P</i>=0.026) and staged surgery (Coeff.=0.410, <i>P</i>=0.002). Additionally, greater mesial IPD was associated with reduced MBL (Coeff.=-0.143, <i>P</i>=0.046), and a similar trend was observed for distal IPD (Coeff.=-0.316, <i>P</i>=0.068).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a high cumulative survival rate for tapered-straight-tapered dental implants over a 5-year period. DM, staged surgery, and IPD showed strong associations with increased MBL. The results suggest that tapered-straight-tapered implants offer advantages in terms of peri-implant MBL and consistent clinical outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of considering these variables in clinical decision-making to optimize implant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of tapered-straight-tapered dental implants: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hyunkyung Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Hyunjae Kim, Sungtae Kim, Young-Dan Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.5051/jpis.2403220161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of tapered-straight-tapered dental implants, considering various associated factors, over an observational period of ≥5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 186 patients who underwent tapered-straight-tapered dental implant placement at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from 2014 to 2019. Digital panoramic radiographic images and dental records were examined. We evaluated multiple variables, such as sex, age, diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking status, placement region, jaw type (maxilla and mandible), implant diameter, implant length, staged surgery, immediate placement, splinted prosthesis, and implant placement depth (IPD). We first determined the implant survival rate using Kaplan-Meier analysis and analyzed potential risk factors for implant survival using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression. Next, the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences in MBL across variables. Linear mixed-effects models with backward stepwise selection were used to identify associations between risk factors and MBL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 316 implants in 186 patients, monitored over a follow-up period of 7.0±1.36 years. The cumulative survival rate of the implants was 98.1%. The average mesial and distal MBLs were 0.59±1.36 mm and 0.68±1.36 mm, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models indicated that MBL exhibited statistically significant positive correlations with DM (Coeff.=0.614, <i>P</i>=0.026) and staged surgery (Coeff.=0.410, <i>P</i>=0.002). Additionally, greater mesial IPD was associated with reduced MBL (Coeff.=-0.143, <i>P</i>=0.046), and a similar trend was observed for distal IPD (Coeff.=-0.316, <i>P</i>=0.068).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a high cumulative survival rate for tapered-straight-tapered dental implants over a 5-year period. DM, staged surgery, and IPD showed strong associations with increased MBL. The results suggest that tapered-straight-tapered implants offer advantages in terms of peri-implant MBL and consistent clinical outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of considering these variables in clinical decision-making to optimize implant outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2403220161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2403220161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究旨在评估锥形-直锥形种植体的长期生存率和边缘骨损失(MBL),考虑各种相关因素,观察期≥5年。方法:本研究纳入2014年至2019年在首尔国立大学牙科医院行锥形-直锥形种植体种植的186例患者。检查了数字全景放射图像和牙科记录。我们评估了多个变量,如性别、年龄、糖尿病(DM)、吸烟状况、放置区域、颌型(上颌和下颌骨)、种植体直径、种植体长度、分期手术、立即放置、夹板假体和种植体放置深度(IPD)。我们首先使用Kaplan-Meier分析确定种植体存活率,然后使用混合效应Cox比例风险回归分析影响种植体存活的潜在危险因素。接下来,使用Mann-Whitney和Kruskal-Wallis测试来检查MBL在不同变量之间的差异。采用反向逐步选择的线性混合效应模型来确定危险因素与MBL之间的关系。结果:本研究包括186例患者的316颗种植体,随访时间为7.0±1.36年。种植体的累积成活率为98.1%。中、远端胫束平均分别为0.59±1.36 mm和0.68±1.36 mm。线性混合效应模型显示MBL与DM (Coeff.=0.614, P=0.026)、分期手术(Coeff.=0.410, P=0.002)呈显著正相关。此外,更大的近端IPD与MBL减少相关(Coeff =-0.143, P=0.046),远端IPD也有类似的趋势(Coeff =-0.316, P=0.068)。结论:本研究表明锥形-直锥形牙种植体在5年期间具有较高的累积存活率。糖尿病、分阶段手术和IPD与MBL增加密切相关。结果表明,锥形-直锥形种植体在种植体周围MBL和一致的临床结果方面具有优势。这些发现强调了在临床决策中考虑这些变量以优化种植效果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical evaluation of tapered-straight-tapered dental implants: a retrospective analysis.

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of tapered-straight-tapered dental implants, considering various associated factors, over an observational period of ≥5 years.

Methods: This study included 186 patients who underwent tapered-straight-tapered dental implant placement at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from 2014 to 2019. Digital panoramic radiographic images and dental records were examined. We evaluated multiple variables, such as sex, age, diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking status, placement region, jaw type (maxilla and mandible), implant diameter, implant length, staged surgery, immediate placement, splinted prosthesis, and implant placement depth (IPD). We first determined the implant survival rate using Kaplan-Meier analysis and analyzed potential risk factors for implant survival using mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression. Next, the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences in MBL across variables. Linear mixed-effects models with backward stepwise selection were used to identify associations between risk factors and MBL.

Results: This study included 316 implants in 186 patients, monitored over a follow-up period of 7.0±1.36 years. The cumulative survival rate of the implants was 98.1%. The average mesial and distal MBLs were 0.59±1.36 mm and 0.68±1.36 mm, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models indicated that MBL exhibited statistically significant positive correlations with DM (Coeff.=0.614, P=0.026) and staged surgery (Coeff.=0.410, P=0.002). Additionally, greater mesial IPD was associated with reduced MBL (Coeff.=-0.143, P=0.046), and a similar trend was observed for distal IPD (Coeff.=-0.316, P=0.068).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated a high cumulative survival rate for tapered-straight-tapered dental implants over a 5-year period. DM, staged surgery, and IPD showed strong associations with increased MBL. The results suggest that tapered-straight-tapered implants offer advantages in terms of peri-implant MBL and consistent clinical outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of considering these variables in clinical decision-making to optimize implant outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信