性少数青年女性相对肥胖与身体不满。

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katherine Sullivan, Elroy J Aguiar, Lee J Winchester, Stefanie A Wind, Michael R Esco, Michael V Fedewa
{"title":"性少数青年女性相对肥胖与身体不满。","authors":"Katherine Sullivan, Elroy J Aguiar, Lee J Winchester, Stefanie A Wind, Michael R Esco, Michael V Fedewa","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2503411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine potential differences in body mass index (BMI), relative adiposity (%Fat), and body dissatisfaction (BD) between heterosexual (HSW) and sexual minority women (SMW). Young adult women (<i>n</i> = 84; 23.8% SMW; 21.9 ± 3.8 years) were included in our analysis. %Fat was assessed using a four-compartment model. BD was assessed using the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), the BD subscale of the Eating Disorders Inventory Questionnaire (EDI-BD), the appearance evaluation subscale of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ-AE), and the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). Potential differences in BMI, %Fat, and BD between sexual orientation groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests. Bivariate correlations were assessed using Pearson's <i>r</i>. No differences in BMI or BD were observed between groups (all <i>p</i> > .05). Higher %Fat was observed in SMW when compared to HSW (<i>p</i> = .046), and higher %Fat was associated with higher BSQ (<i>r</i> = .364), EDI-BD (<i>r</i> = .388), lower MBSRQ-AE (<i>r</i> = .388), and PFRS (<i>r</i> = .521), collectively indicating greater BD. %Fat was higher in SMW, and higher %Fat was associated with greater BD, regardless of sexual orientation. These results suggest that SMW tend to have higher %Fat than heterosexual counterparts which would increase their risk of negative health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative Adiposity and Body Dissatisfaction in Young Adult Sexual Minority Women.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Sullivan, Elroy J Aguiar, Lee J Winchester, Stefanie A Wind, Michael R Esco, Michael V Fedewa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2503411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine potential differences in body mass index (BMI), relative adiposity (%Fat), and body dissatisfaction (BD) between heterosexual (HSW) and sexual minority women (SMW). Young adult women (<i>n</i> = 84; 23.8% SMW; 21.9 ± 3.8 years) were included in our analysis. %Fat was assessed using a four-compartment model. BD was assessed using the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), the BD subscale of the Eating Disorders Inventory Questionnaire (EDI-BD), the appearance evaluation subscale of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ-AE), and the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). Potential differences in BMI, %Fat, and BD between sexual orientation groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests. Bivariate correlations were assessed using Pearson's <i>r</i>. No differences in BMI or BD were observed between groups (all <i>p</i> > .05). Higher %Fat was observed in SMW when compared to HSW (<i>p</i> = .046), and higher %Fat was associated with higher BSQ (<i>r</i> = .364), EDI-BD (<i>r</i> = .388), lower MBSRQ-AE (<i>r</i> = .388), and PFRS (<i>r</i> = .521), collectively indicating greater BD. %Fat was higher in SMW, and higher %Fat was associated with greater BD, regardless of sexual orientation. These results suggest that SMW tend to have higher %Fat than heterosexual counterparts which would increase their risk of negative health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2503411\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2503411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究异性恋女性(HSW)和性少数女性(SMW)在体重指数(BMI)、相对肥胖(%Fat)和身体不满(BD)方面的潜在差异。年轻成年女性(n = 84;南都23.8%;(21.9±3.8)岁)。采用四室模型评估%脂肪。采用体型问卷(BSQ)、饮食失调量表(edii -BD)的BD子量表、多维身体自我关系问卷(MBSRQ-AE)的外观评价子量表和摄影身材评定量表(PFRS)对BD进行评估。使用独立样本t检验评估性取向组之间BMI、%Fat和BD的潜在差异。使用Pearson’s r评估双变量相关性。两组间BMI或BD均无差异(均p < 0.05)。与HSW相比,SMW中较高的%Fat (p = 0.046),较高的%Fat与较高的BSQ (r = 0.364)、edii -BD (r = 0.388)、较低的MBSRQ-AE (r = 0.388)和PFRS (r = 0.521)相关,共同表明BD较高。无论性取向如何,SMW中较高的%Fat和较高的%Fat都与较高的BD相关。这些结果表明,与异性恋者相比,同性恋者往往有更高的脂肪百分比,这将增加他们出现负面健康结果的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative Adiposity and Body Dissatisfaction in Young Adult Sexual Minority Women.

The purpose of this study was to examine potential differences in body mass index (BMI), relative adiposity (%Fat), and body dissatisfaction (BD) between heterosexual (HSW) and sexual minority women (SMW). Young adult women (n = 84; 23.8% SMW; 21.9 ± 3.8 years) were included in our analysis. %Fat was assessed using a four-compartment model. BD was assessed using the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), the BD subscale of the Eating Disorders Inventory Questionnaire (EDI-BD), the appearance evaluation subscale of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ-AE), and the Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS). Potential differences in BMI, %Fat, and BD between sexual orientation groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests. Bivariate correlations were assessed using Pearson's r. No differences in BMI or BD were observed between groups (all p > .05). Higher %Fat was observed in SMW when compared to HSW (p = .046), and higher %Fat was associated with higher BSQ (r = .364), EDI-BD (r = .388), lower MBSRQ-AE (r = .388), and PFRS (r = .521), collectively indicating greater BD. %Fat was higher in SMW, and higher %Fat was associated with greater BD, regardless of sexual orientation. These results suggest that SMW tend to have higher %Fat than heterosexual counterparts which would increase their risk of negative health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信